The path to personalized medicine

Vaccination News Home Page

http://news.bmn.com/magazine/article?pii=S136759310200340X

 
Research
Tools
Reviews Journal
Collection
News &
Comment
Books &
Labware
Science
Jobs
Web
Links
news.bmn.com Latest
Updates
Today's
News
Magazine Conference
Reporter
Commentary Journal
Scan
Special
Report
My E-mail
Alerts
Section
Search
  My BMN My BMN Exit Exit  
  Send Feedback to BMN Feedback Help System Help  


 

About This Section
BioMedNet Reviews
Is the world’s largest life science reviews database. It includes over 16,000 articles drawn from over 150 life science and biomedical journals.

 
BioMedNet Reviews

 
Access To This Section
As a BioMedNet member you have:

Free full-text access to this article within BioMedNet Reviews for 14 days.

Access to abstracts of all articles in the Reviews database.

You will have a full-text access to all other articles if your institute subscribes. Recommend to your librarian.

 

 
Did you know?
Full-text access to BioMedNet Reviews is available on subscription for your institute or company. More information

 
Email Alerts
You can customize your email alerts from BioMedNet Reviews to keep up to date with your own interests. Sign up here

 


 

 


 
 

The path to personalized medicine
Joanne M. Meyer and Geoffrey S. Ginsburg
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2002, 6:434-438
journal coverAdvances in personalized medicine, or the use of an individual's molecular profile to direct the practice of medicine, have been greatly enabled through human genome research. This research is leading to the identification of a range of molecular markers for predisposition testing, disease screening and prognostic assessment, as well as markers used to predict and monitor drug response. Successful personalized medicine research programs will not only require strategies for developing and validating biomarkers, but also coordinating these efforts with drug discovery and clinical development.

 
Introduction

The realization of personalized medicine, or the fine tailoring of the practice of medicine to an individual, is being fostered through numerous efforts aimed at characterizing individual differences in molecular processes underlying disease pathogenesis, disease progression and the response to therapeutics. Once these molecular differences are understood, therapeutic development will be enhanced by using the information to identify individuals more likely to benefit from a given intervention strategy. High-throughput genomic technologies are already providing the data that will serve as the foundation of personalized medicine. Here, we briefly describe the current state of those technologies and highlight the directions required to fully develop and integrate personalized medicine into practice. We draw upon a range of examples that demonstrate the relevance of molecular markers throughout the development and treatment of disease, including markers for disease predisposition, screening and progression, as well as markers for drug response and drug monitoring ( Fig. 1).

Individual differences in the development of disease and response to therapeutics

Clearly, for many common diseases, there is abundant evidence to suggest that the molecular underpinnings of disease susceptibility, and its natural history, differ markedly among individuals. For example, while it has been demonstrated in numerous investigations that the development of obesity, asthma, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease are under genetic control [1–4] , there is no evidence to suggest that the genetic basis is due to variation in just a single gene. Instead, the consensus has emerged that subtle genetic differences in one or many of several genes serve as risk factors for these illnesses. Thus, while genetic variants in the melanocortin-4 receptor may explain some risk for developing obesity [5], and polymorphisms in PPAR-gamma may correlate with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes [6•], these variants do not explain all of these genetic diseases. There are certainly more genetic variants, or predisposition markers, to uncover. In the context of personalized medicine, the ultimate goal of these types of studies is to provide a suite of markers that can be used to assess one's lifetime risk of developing disease in the presence of various environmental (e.g. diet, lifestyle) variables.

As with disease predisposition, individual differences characterize disease progression. For example, some individuals with impaired glucose tolerance will proceed quite rapidly to type 2 diabetes, whereas others proceed slowly. Similarly, individuals diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis may or may not develop erosive disease. In both of these cases, genetic variation, that is, variation measured at the DNA level, may be a good predictor of the individual differences that emerge as disease progresses. For example, Brinkman et al. [7] have demonstrated that a polymorphism in TNF-alpha correlates with erosive rheumatoid arthritis, but shows no association with non-erosive disease. Alternatively, variation in disease progression may be best predicted by a combination of genetic and environmental factors, the impact of which is indexed through changes in gene expression in relevant tissues, or changes in secreted protein levels in serum or synovial fluid. In our laboratories, we are using a range of genomics technologies to find markers for disease progression that are both stable (DNA) as well as dynamic (mRNA, protein), giving us the opportunity to evaluate the utility of both types of markers in prospective studies.

Given that individual variability in disease predisposition and progression exists and has the potential of being molecularly characterized, it is not at all surprising that such differences also characterize response to therapeutics (see Fig. 1). Marked individual variation in the efficacy and toxicity of therapeutic compounds is common and can have a profound impact on the success of a pharmaceutical clinical development program. Clearly, molecular markers that predict the variation in these endpoints could be extremely useful in clinical trials, drug development and clinical practice, as they would allow the identification of patients who would benefit most from the drug.



 
Go to the Full Article > >


Bullet As a BioMedNet member you have free full-text access to this article within BioMedNet Reviews for 14 days

Bullet You will have full-text access to all articles if your institute subscribes.
Recommend a subscription to your librarian

Bullet There are 15,000 more Review articles in BioMedNet Reviews

Bullet Please send us your feedback on this magazine
 

 
BioMedNet Magazine
17th - 30th July 2002
home icon Magazine Home
email icon Email to a Friend
full article icon Full Article
printer icon PDF printer ready version
 

Further Reading*
Personalized medicine: revolutionizing drug discovery and patient care
[Review]
Geoffrey S Ginsburg and Jeanette J McCarthy
Trends in Biotechnology 2001, 19:491-496

 
Molecular diagnostics as a predictive tool: genetics of drug efficacy and toxicity
[Review]
Julie A Johnson and William E Evans
Trends in Molecular Medicine 2002, 8:300-305

 
The evolving role of information technology in the drug discovery process
[Review]
Jeffrey Augen
Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7:315-323

 
 
* Full text access to the journal articles above is available to BioMedNet Reviews institutional subscribers

 
 
Just the beginning for genetic therapies
[BioMedNet Conference Reporter]
Rabiya S. Tuma
Saturday Oct 13th, 2001


 

Related Links in BioMedNet Reviews
Journal Table of Contents
Table of Contents by email
Related Full Text Articles
Browse Molecular Medicine
Search BioMedNet Reviews


 



 
Click here for more details
 


Click here for more details

BioMedNet
Home
News &
Comment
My BMN
 
Help System
 
Send Feedback to BMN
 
Information for Advertisers © Elsevier Science Limited 2002

 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.