|
| About This Section |
 |
| BioMedNet Reviews |
Is the worlds largest life science reviews
database. It includes over 16,000 articles drawn from over 150 life
science and biomedical journals.
|

|
|
| Access To This Section |
As a BioMedNet member you have:
Free full-text access to this
article within BioMedNet Reviews for 14 days.
Access to abstracts of all articles
in the Reviews database.
You will have a full-text access to all other articles if your
institute subscribes.
Recommend to your librarian.
|
| |
| Did you know? |
Full-text access to BioMedNet Reviews is
available on subscription for your institute or company.
More information
|
| Email Alerts |
You can customize your email alerts from
BioMedNet Reviews to keep up to date with your own interests.
Sign up
here
|
|
|
 |

| |
|
|
Advances
in personalized medicine, or the use of an individual's
molecular profile to direct the practice of medicine, have
been greatly enabled through human genome research. This
research is leading to the identification of a range of
molecular markers for predisposition testing, disease
screening and prognostic assessment, as well as markers used
to predict and monitor drug response. Successful personalized
medicine research programs will not only require strategies
for developing and validating biomarkers, but also
coordinating these efforts with drug discovery and clinical
development.
|
Introduction
The realization of personalized medicine, or the fine
tailoring of the practice of medicine to an individual, is
being fostered through numerous efforts aimed at
characterizing individual differences in molecular processes
underlying disease pathogenesis, disease progression and the
response to therapeutics. Once these molecular differences are
understood, therapeutic development will be enhanced by using
the information to identify individuals more likely to benefit
from a given intervention strategy. High-throughput genomic
technologies are already providing the data that will serve as
the foundation of personalized medicine. Here, we briefly
describe the current state of those technologies and highlight
the directions required to fully develop and integrate
personalized medicine into practice. We draw upon a range of
examples that demonstrate the relevance of molecular markers
throughout the development and treatment of disease, including
markers for disease predisposition, screening and progression,
as well as markers for drug response and drug monitoring (
Fig. 1).
Individual differences in the development of disease and
response to therapeutics
Clearly, for many common diseases, there is abundant
evidence to suggest that the molecular underpinnings of
disease susceptibility, and its natural history, differ
markedly among individuals. For example, while it has been
demonstrated in numerous investigations that the development
of obesity, asthma, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease
are under genetic control
[14] , there is no evidence to suggest that the genetic
basis is due to variation in just a single gene. Instead, the
consensus has emerged that subtle genetic differences in one
or many of several genes serve as risk factors for these
illnesses. Thus, while genetic variants in the melanocortin-4
receptor may explain some risk for developing obesity
[5], and polymorphisms in PPAR-gamma may correlate with
the risk of developing type 2 diabetes
[6], these variants do not explain all of these genetic
diseases. There are certainly more genetic variants, or
predisposition markers, to uncover. In the context of
personalized medicine, the ultimate goal of these types of
studies is to provide a suite of markers that can be used to
assess one's lifetime risk of developing disease in the
presence of various environmental (e.g. diet, lifestyle)
variables.
As with disease predisposition, individual differences
characterize disease progression. For example, some
individuals with impaired glucose tolerance will proceed quite
rapidly to type 2 diabetes, whereas others proceed slowly.
Similarly, individuals diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis may
or may not develop erosive disease. In both of these cases,
genetic variation, that is, variation measured at the DNA
level, may be a good predictor of the individual differences
that emerge as disease progresses. For example, Brinkman et
al.
[7] have demonstrated that a polymorphism in TNF-
correlates with erosive rheumatoid arthritis, but shows no
association with non-erosive disease. Alternatively, variation
in disease progression may be best predicted by a combination
of genetic and environmental factors, the impact of which is
indexed through changes in gene expression in relevant
tissues, or changes in secreted protein levels in serum or
synovial fluid. In our laboratories, we are using a range of
genomics technologies to find markers for disease progression
that are both stable (DNA) as well as dynamic (mRNA, protein),
giving us the opportunity to evaluate the utility of both
types of markers in prospective studies.
Given that individual variability in disease predisposition
and progression exists and has the potential of being
molecularly characterized, it is not at all surprising that
such differences also characterize response to therapeutics
(see
Fig. 1). Marked individual variation in the efficacy and
toxicity of therapeutic compounds is common and can have a
profound impact on the success of a pharmaceutical clinical
development program. Clearly, molecular markers that predict
the variation in these endpoints could be extremely useful in
clinical trials, drug development and clinical practice, as
they would allow the identification of patients who would
benefit most from the drug.
|
|
Go to the Full Article > > |
|
|
As
a BioMedNet member you have free
full-text access to this article
within BioMedNet Reviews for 14 days
You
will have full-text access to all articles if your institute
subscribes.
Recommend a subscription to your librarian
There
are 15,000 more Review articles in
BioMedNet Reviews
Please
send us your
feedback on this magazine
|
|
|
|
BioMedNet Magazine
17th - 30th July 2002 |
|
 |
|
|
| Related
Links in BioMedNet Reviews |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| |

|