Oestrogen only HRT increases risk of ovarian cancer
Deborah Josefson, Nebraska
Women taking oestrogen only hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for 10 years or
more face a 60% greater risk of developing ovariancancer than if
they had never taken it, a new study shows (JAMA
2002;288:334-41)[Medline].
The study follows recent research implicating HRT in small increased risks of
cardiovascular disease, breast and uterine cancers,blood clots, and
stroke. HRT is used by an estimated 13.5 millionwomen in the United
Statesnearly eight
million take oestrogenonly pills and around six million take the
combined oestrogenand progestogenform.
Dr James Lacey and colleagues from the US National Cancer Institute's
Division of Epidemiology tracked the health of 44241postmenopausal
women, who were initially enrolled in the prospectivebreast cancer
detection demonstration project, a breast cancerscreening programme
conducted in 29 sites across the United Statesfrom 1973 to1980.
The researchers collected monitoring data, including information on type and
length of HRT, age at first use, and developmentof any subsequent
cancer, from 1978 to 1998. The data were collectedthrough telephone
interviews and questionnaires and covered 31354women.
Until 1986 there was no attempt to distinguish oestrogen alone from oestrogen
plus progestogen treatments, but subsequentlythis information was
collected, including the number of days inthe month the treatments
were used. After 1993 information onnames of drugs and doses was
alsocollected.
Women in whom menopause was surgically induced, such as women who had had a
hysterectomy, were included in the study if theyhad at least one
ovary. Women who had had a bilateral oophorectomyor had ovarian or
breast cancers before follow up wereexcluded.
Overall 329 women developed ovarian cancer during the monitoring period.
Their average age at the start of the study was 56.6years.
Compared with no use of HRT, use of oestrogen only HRT was associated with an
increased risk of ovarian cancer, and this riskincreased over time
(rate ratio 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.2to 2.0).
The rate ratio was 1.8 (1.1 to 3.0) for 10-19 years of use and 3.2 (1.7 to
5.7) for 20 or more years (P value for trend <0.001).Furthermore,
the rate ratio increased by 7% (2% to 13%) for everyyear ofuse.
The rate ratio for use of oestrogen plus progestogen HRT was 1.1 (0.64 to
1.7). Switching to this form of HRT after previousoestrogen only use
did not completely eliminate the previous risk,conferring a rate
ratio of 1.5 (0.91 to 2.4).
The women's international study of long duration oestrogen after menopause
(WISDOM) study should continue, says the MedicalResearch Council,
as long as women volunteering for the trialare fully informed of
all the known risks and benefits ofHRT.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"