Malaria as diverse as us?
Gene screen suggests one drug won't
beat parasite.
18 July 2002
TOM CLARKE
 |
| The malaria parasite: we go
back a long way. |
| © SPL |
|
|
The parasite that causes malaria is much older and more
genetically diverse than some researchers had thought, a new
analysis has revealed. The discovery could mean that it will be
difficult to make drugs and vaccines to combat the disease
worldwide3.
Each year malaria kills up to 2.7 million people and makes
over 200 million sick. Many scientists had suspected that the
Plasmodium falciparum parasite that causes the disease is as
diverse as the humans that it infects.
But four years ago Francisco Ayala of the University of
California, Irvine, suggested that the majority of parasites
died out 3,000-5,000 years ago, leaving just a small population1.
This seed population, being genetically quite homogenous, would,
he reasoned, be poorly equipped to develop resistance to drugs
or vaccines.
Dubbed the 'Malaria's Eve' hypothesis, this appealing but
controversial idea raised hopes that a vaccine or drug developed
against P. falciparum from Thailand, say, would stand a
good chance of working against one from Africa.
The latest analysis "lays that idea to rest", says Austin
Hughes, who works on the molecular biology of evolution of the
University of South Carolina in Columbia. Carried out by
Xin-zhuan Su, of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases in Bethesda, Maryland, and colleagues, it is
the largest survey of a section the P. falciparum genome
carried out so far.
Su's team concludes that malaria parasites have been evolving
separately for between 100,000 and 180,000 years. "This is
around the time when the human population exploded," says Su. As
humans began to migrate around the globe, it looks like the
malaria parasite went with them.
Site specific
The researchers scanned the third chromosome of P.
falciparum from five continents. They looked for one-letter
differences in the DNA code known as single-nucleotide
polymorphisms, or SNPs2. These are a
measure of the number of random mutations that an organism has
undergone, and therefore how closely related it is to others of
the same species.
Previous studies, Su suggests, may not have sampled a
sufficiently diverse array of malaria parasites from around the
globe.
|
They leave the issue of Malaria's Eve
completely open
|
Francisco Ayala
University of California |
|
|
Ayala is not convinced. "The analysis has major flaws," he
says, arguing that the genome sites chosen for study are too
unstable to estimate the age of a population. "They leave the
issue of Malaria's Eve completely open," he concludes.
Others are more sanguine. These flaws are real, concedes
Andrew Clark, a population geneticist at Cornell University in
Ithaca, New York. Nevertheless, he says, Su's study "is far
larger than its predecessors, and provides strong evidence that
P. falciparum is diverse enough to raise a greater
challenge for publc-health measures."
What is clear is that the argument must be settled soon.
Having a good idea of the genetic background of P. falciparum
"could tell us something about how to design strategies to
combat the disease", says malaria geneticist Karen Day of the
University of Oxford, UK. If malaria proves to be more
recalcitrant than drug designers had thought, they need to know
sooner rather than later.
In a simultaneous study, Su's team scanned the entire
parasite genome for a gene known to cause resistance to
chloroquine - a common anti-malaria drug. It was thought that
chloroquine resistance evolved twice, once in South America and
once in Southeast Asia. Su's team conclude that it must have
evolved separately in at least four places: South East Asia,
Papua New Guinea and twice in South America. In addition, they
find that once chloroquine resistance evolved in South East Asia
it spread to Africa in a matter of decades.
Chloroquine resistance is still rare, but the new finding
lends weight to the argument that P. falciparum is
worryingly adaptable. |