A British general practitioner, much loved by his patients, murdered at least
215 of them and probably killed another 45 (p
181). It took him more than 20 years. The important questions
seem to be why; why wasn't he detected sooner; and could it happen
again? Nobody knows why Harold Shipman killed, but a High Courtjudge
has speculated that he was "addicted to killing." Once he'dstarted
he seemed unable to stopand
needed "larger doses." Hegot away with it for so long because he was
trusted, the practiceof singlehanded general practitioners was
largely unmonitored,and the authorities took a long time to accept
what seemed unbelievable.We all want to think that it couldn't
happen again, but it ishard to build systems that will deal with
extreme events withouthaving adverse effects on the
everyday.
Interestinglybut not
perhaps unbelievablyShipman
has reported the forensic psychiatrist who examined him to the GeneralMedical Council for breach of confidentiality (p
181). The GMCofficial who opened the letter of complaint must
have been astonished,but Shipman still has rightsand
a society is to be judged onhow it deals with the rights of those at
the very edge of society.Nobody is closer to the edge of British
society thanShipman.
In Kerala a doctor has got himself into trouble for giving sildenafil
(Viagra) to three babies who were extremely ill withpulmonary
hypertension (p
181). All three survived. "There werechildren dying in my
presence, and I was expected as a responsiblephysician to use all
available methods to save my patients," saysthe accused doctor. The
BMJ often finds itself struggling withthe question of where
clinical innovation ends and experimentbegins. This smells like anexperiment.
Something strange has also emerged in Scotland. A group has examined all
patients with endometrial cancer and found that thosewho wait longer
for treatment survive longer (p
196). The authorsdon't know why, but it seems unlikely that any
government willdemand longer waiting times in order to reduce cancerdeaths.
But governments may be asking their advisers to look at indications for
arthroscopic lavage or debridement for osteoarthritisof the knees (p
182). The New England Journal of Medicine hasreported a
trial in which patients were randomised to debridement,lavage, or
placebo surgery, in which a small incision was madebut no
instruments inserted. During two years' follow up therewas no
difference in the three groups, potentially pulling theplug on a
billion dollar industry in the United States. The trialraises the
question of whether all surgical procedures shouldbe tested against
placebo. Virtually none have been, removingperhaps any evidence base
fromsurgery.
Lastly, the BMJ is proud to report a true "breakthrough." For years we
have reported on overcrowding in emergency departments.Now an
Argentinian intervention has not just reduced attendanceat an
emergency room but abolished it altogether (p
228).
PAPERS The waiting time paradox: population based retrospective study of
treatment delay and survival of women with endometrial cancer in Scotland.
Simon C Crawford, Jonathan A Davis, Nadeem A Siddiqui, Linda de Caestecker,
Charles R Gillis, David Hole, and Gillian Penney
BMJ 2002 325: 196. [Full text]
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"