The publication of a big clinical trial may be a major medical, media,
financial, and political event. Results are beamedround the world in
moments. Patients may panic. Doctors startdebating the implications.
Share prices may rocket or tumble.Governments haven't yet fallen
because of the result of a trial(making medicine less important than
soccer), but they are oftenobliged torespond.
Last week's big trial, published in JAMA (p 113),
was of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Part of thestudy was stopped early because women taking continuous combinedoestrogen-progestogen had an increased risk of developing breastcancer. The results show that among 10 000 women taking this treatmentthere will be each yearcompared
with women taking no treatmenteightextra cases of invasive breast cancer, seven heart attacks, eightstrokes, and eight pulmonary embolisms. But there will also be
six fewer bowel cancers and five fewer hip fractures. Overall
mortality is not affected. So should a woman take hormone replacement
therapy? Researchers can try to unravel the consequences of different
treatment regimens. Doctors can offer advice. But ultimately onlythe
woman herself candecide.
Another JAMA trial that is causing continuing controversy is the CLASS
trial that compared traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatorydrugs
with celecoxib, a COX 2 inhibitor (p
161). The central questionis whether the COX 2 inhibitor causes
fewer gastrointestinal sideeffects, as would be expected on
theoretical grounds. The JAMAstudy suggested this was the
case. But controversy began whenit emerged that more complete
information contradicted theseresults.
We published an editorial on 1 June that extended criticisms of the CLASS
trial and how its results were "spun." The resultwas a media
"firestorm" in the United States and much of Europebut not,
interestingly, in Britain. This seemed to happen partlybecause the
suggestion of manipulation of data coincided withanxiety over the
manipulation of financial data by Enron and Worldcom.Pharmacia, the
manufacturers of celecoxib and the funders of theCLASS trial (who
are being acquired by Pfizer (p
123)), were understandablyupset. They respond today, but so do
the authors of the editorialand others (p 161).
BMJ readersmany
of whom prescribe these drugsareprobably very confused by the debate over the trials, but the
journal will soon be publishing other studies on this important
question.
Far away from the hype and complexity of big trials are some compelling human
stories. Claire McKenna reviews a play thatdescribes an 18 year old
Nigerian pregnant woman being held downand having her clitoris cut
awaybecause it is
believed that ifthe baby's head touches the clitoris when being born
either themother or baby will die (p
169). Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, a healtheconomist, describes
beautifully "coming out" as a blind personand getting a dog, Vikki.
A blind dog costs £35 000, giving acost per QALY of £6375asnip.
Are selective COX 2 inhibitors superior to traditional NSAIDs?
Brian R Budenholzer, G Steven Geis, Muhammad Mamdani, David N Juurlink,
Geoffrey M Anderson, Richard R Stover, Peter Jüni, Anne W S Rutjes, and Paul
Dieppe
BMJ 2002 325: 161.
[Letter]
Related editorials in BMJ:
Hormone replacement therapy .
John C Stevenson and Malcolm I Whitehead
BMJ 2002 325: 113-114. [Full text]
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"