|
Barrier in battle to ease son's pain
Autistic boy's parents cannot find anyone to do physical tests,
writes VICKY COLLINS
HE may not have the communication skills to explain what is wrong, but
Karen McGoldrick knows her son is in pain.
It is seven years since Patrick first began developing the symptoms of
autism and Mrs McGoldrick has yet to find anyone in the medical
establishment who will investigate her son's physical complaints, instead of
his behavioural patterns.
"I had seen Patrick develop normally until nearly two years old," she
said. "He had gone through all the development checks and he could speak,
but then it all became gobbledegook.
"He would just start screaming and he became totally withdrawn. It was
frightening. He was seven years old before he was finally diagnosed with
autism.
"Patrick can be quite a loving child, but sometimes he gets quite
aggressive and I think that is often because he is in pain. I have always
said there is something physically wrong."
Research released yesterday by Gordon Bell, of Stirling University, is
the first suggestion that her conviction could be right.
In tests on children with autism, the related Asperger's syndrome, and
non-autistic children, Dr Bell found those with autism had significantly
higher levels of three immune-suppressing toxins than the other children.
He believes that the bodies of autistic children may not be capable of
excreting these toxins effectively, leading to the build-up.
Mrs McGoldrick, from Johnstone, near Paisley, does not know whether
Patrick has problems with toxin build-up because, like the majority of
autistic children, he has never been tested. He does, however, suffer from
severe constipation.
Mrs McGoldrick also does not know whether there is any connection between
his condition and the MMR vaccine he received nine months before the
symptoms developed.
"He has got a lot of problems with his bowels and we have been asking for
a referral to a gastro-enterologist, but we haven't got one yet.
"My sole concern is that I see a child in pain, but they won't do the
tests on him. I have even been told not to bring Patrick to consultations
because he is too distracting."
Mrs McGoldrick, 36, is one of almost 2000 parents in Scotland whose
children suffer from autism. There is a widespread belief the condition is
linked to the triple MMR vaccine.
Like many of those parents, not only has Mrs McGoldrick lost the normal,
healthy son of seven years ago, she is battling against an apparent
reluctance to investigate the causes of autism, and the possible cures.
Government advisers have declared MMR vaccine officially safe.
This is despite the uproar caused by Andrew Wakefield in 1998, a reader
in experimental gastro-enterology at the Royal Free Hospital, London, when
he suggested that the MMR vaccine might be linked to an increased risk of
autism and bowel disorders. He believed that MMR may overload the immune
system.
However, Dr Bell believes that if MMR is linked, it is as a trigger, not
a cause. The toxins he found in high levels in autism sufferers suppress the
immune system, which then may not be able to cope with the triple vaccine.
Despite the Department of Health's reassurances on MMR, many parents have
chosen not to use it, opting for single vaccines.
In some areas of Britain reported take-up of MMR dipped below 50% this
year. According to the World Health Organisation, 95% of the population need
to be vaccinated for an immunisation programme to be effective.
For parents like Mrs McGoldrick, and her husband, also Patrick, the
choice is clear-cut. She is expecting her third child - her youngest son has
not developed autism - and says they have no intention of giving the new
baby a MMR jab. She, like many of the families affected by autism in the
past four years, wants to see more research into the causes of autism before
she will accept any government reassurances on MMR.
That includes acceptance that autism may not solely be a genetic,
psychiatric disorder and investigations into the physical conditions that
could worsen the symptoms or even cause the condition. Mrs McGoldrick
welcomed the research done by Dr Bell but said it was time that mainstream
medical research organisations stopped leaving it to the families to
investigate the disease.
"I think a medical investigation has to be done on individual children.
People perceive autism as a mental illness, but there is so much more to it
than that," she said.
Last February, the Department of Health announced £2.5m would be put
aside for research into autism.
The Medical Research Council (MRC) is currently considering how to
distribute the money, although it has emphasised that the studies will look
beyond the alleged link with the MMR vaccine to investigate genetic data and
environmental risks.
The latter includes toxins and Dr Bell hopes his research could encourage
the MRC to invest cash in a similar study on a larger scale. If that is the
case, the Department of Health may find that MMR is implicated after all.
-July 22nd
 |