http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7357/0/e
| Home | Help | Search/Archive | Feedback | Table of Contents |
Findings from qualitative research have been deemed "thin," "trite," and
"banal." Lambert and McKevitt (p
210) explain that the problems lie not in methods but in the
misguided separation of method from theory. They advocate the greater
involvement of anthroplogy, which views the familiar afresh and tries
to make the strange comprehensible. The authors explain that this
discipline has a lot to contribute to qualitative research; it can
foster true multidisciplinary research by offering relevant
conceptual frameworks, substantive knowledge, and methodological
insights.
| Home | Help | Search/Archive | Feedback | Table of Contents |
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.