Vaccination News Home Page

http://www.aaohn.org/public_policy/Comments/cdc_smallpox_june_2002.cfm


 
Search:

    

AAOHN > Public Policy > Comments > cdc_smallpox_june_2002 
 










AAOHN’s comments regarding the use of the smallpox vaccine, in preparation for the possibility of a bioterrorist attack becoming a reality:

 

 

Use of the Smallpox Vaccine in Bioterrorism Preparedness Efforts
June, 2002

You have asked for public comments, requesting specifically for the input of health care providers. As the professional association representing occupational health nurses, our primary mission is to help our members and related stakeholders/publics, and advance the health, safety, and productivity of America’s workers.

 

Our responses to the three questions you have posed for comments are as follows:

 

Question #1 – Relating to the Routine Vaccination of the General Population

 

AAOHN supports the CDC’s current recommendations, and suggests no change to the current standard. The association does not support the re-introduction of routine smallpox immunizations for the U.S. population. AAOHN does support the CDC’s current recommendations to not vaccinate persons in the general population unless a biological terrorism event has occurred.

 

     

  • The potential benefits of vaccinating the entire population must be weighed against the actual risks, such as serious adverse reactions, and the greater number of contraindicated individuals who would be vaccinated in an indiscriminate mass vaccination campaign.

     

     

  • The duration of post-vaccination immunity to the virus that causes smallpox is unknown. According to the CDC’s own MMWR dated June 22, 2001, resistance to the disease is highest in approximately the first 5 years, apparently with "waning immunity" lasting possibly up to 10 years (emphasis added).

     

     

  • Resources spent on vaccinating members of the general public would be better utilized in preparing the nation as a whole for responding—in general—to a bioterrorist attack.

     

 

Question #2 - Identification of Certain Individuals for Non-exposure-related Vaccination

 

AAOHN supports the current CDC recommendations and suggests no changes to the current standard. To clarify our support of the current standards:

 

     

  • AAOHN does not support an attempt to identify certain individuals whose occupations may place them at increased risk of exposure – because of the difficulty in determining the criteria for precisely who is at risk.

     

     

  • Our experience with both anthrax and the events of 9/11 demonstrates the difficulty of pinpointing the targets of terrorists, also to be considered in terms of the location(s) of the strike(s), when considering any non-exposure-related vaccination of health care workers and emergency response personnel.

     

     

  • Again, AAOHN has concerns regarding the unknown length of protection/decreasing efficacy of the smallpox vaccine. How frequently would those selected for vaccination be expected to repeat the process of vaccination and the ensuing isolation?

     

 

AAOHN has specific concerns and recommendations regarding the support of health and safety of health care workers during response to a bioterrorist attack.

 

AAOHN urges the CDC to protect the health and safety of health care workers by considering the following:

 

     

  • When vaccinating health care workers, not all members of any health care team or any one type of health care professional should be vaccinated at the same time, since vaccinated individuals must be isolated—for 14 to 21 days—from those who have a compromised immune system, in order to prevent inadvertent transmission of the vaccina virus.

     

     

  • Many health care providers may be unable to be inoculated due to contraindication, as in the case of immunosuppression. This causes additional concerns and also sets up a situation in which these workers may in turn become "unfit for duty" and unable to respond as needed in such a crisis.

     

     

  • Prevention of exposure to smallpox among health care and other high-risk workers is another concern. Smallpox is spread from one person to another primarily through infected saliva droplets that expose a susceptible person having face-to-face contact with the ill person. The transmission risk lasts until the scabs have fallen off, although the risk is highest in the first week of illness. Proper training and use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) by those coming into contact with the smallpox virus could thus greatly reduce the exposure rate. Considerations in implementing the use of PPE as a strategy to protect health care workers would include: Occupational health nurses and appropriately trained safety personnel who would provide respirator qualification and fit testing may be unavailable, thus adding to the concern of adequately protecting exposed healthcare providers. In addition, some of these professionals may have contraindications to using PPE such as respirators.

     

     

  • Any terrorism response plan must take into account the shortage that is impacting many of the health professions—with no end in plain sight— and take sensible precautions against unduly burdening these critical workers. We have a known shortage of registered nurses, safety and other health care personnel. Scarce resources must be considered as we work to craft effective, realistic—and thus, usable—response plans.

     

 

Question #3 – Relating to the Use of "Ring Vaccination"

 

The association does support any vaccination strategy for containing a smallpox outbreak utilizing the "ring vaccination" concept.

 

     

  • Vaccinating and monitoring a "ring" of people combined with surveillance and isolation of cases is a more effective way of utilizing resources to contain any outbreaks. Occupational health nurses employed by the U.S. Postal Service demonstrated during the anthrax crisis the critical role the profession plays in the active health surveillance efforts that would lead to identification and reporting of suspected smallpox cases. Our members are most often the first health care professional workers turn to for advice and council, and referral for additional health care.

     

     

  • AAOHN recognizes that there is some concern over the efficacy of the ring vaccination method in more densely populated areas. Mass vaccination may be one option to consider. As a part of this consideration, CDC must investigate fast, effective, and safe methods of vaccinating large numbers of people in a limited amount of time (within 3 to 4 days of exposure). In addition, the CDC should ensure that a sufficient supply of vaccinia immunoglobulin (VIG) is available to health care providers in the area, in order to deal with particular serious side effects certain to be experienced by some during such a broad, large-scale vaccination campaign.

     

     

  • Key to the effectiveness of any response to a bioterrorist attack is emergency planning and disaster management. The government may have a stockpile of smallpox vaccine large enough to inoculate the entire population, but what about readily available supplies, e.g. VIG, disposable bifurcated needles? Will it be available to the health care providers of the affected population within a reasonable length of time—given the small window of time to inoculate those exposed to the virus? How will the vaccine be stored and distributed in order to ensure its efficacy? Are health care providers, safety personnel, and other responders appropriately educated and trained in how to administer the vaccine, side effects of the vaccine, treatment of adverse effects? Are/Have there been appropriate steps taken to educate the public? In order to accomplish these things and more—possibly some unforeseeable tasks—there must be coordination, cooperation, and—the lynchpin—communication among health, safety, and policymaking, and other officials at all levels of government. The time to begin these combined efforts is now, so that there is a strategy in place if and when another bioterrorist attack should occur.

     

 

As the largest group of health care providers at the worksite, occupational health nurses play a critical role as first responders in the event of a bioterrorist attack. These nurses also routinely work with employers to design, manage and implement emergency planning and disaster management programs. They work with a number of community agencies that would be involved in the event of a bioterrorist attack (e.g. local emergency personnel, police, fire departments and local board of health). Occupational health nurses’ credentialing, training and access to large population groups uniquely suit them to fulfill a key role in the nation’s response to bioterrorism.

 

The American Association of Occupational Health Nurses (AAOHN) works collaboratively with many federal agencies such as the CDC, NIOSH, and OSHA. We urge the CDC and this committee to call on AAOHN to help craft the most appropriate emergency response to this and other potential biological and yet to be determined threats which would impact the health, safety and security of our nation, our workers, and communities in which they live, work, and serve.
 

 

American Association of Occupational Health Nurses, Inc.
2920 Brandywine Rd. • Suite 100 • Atlanta, GA 30341
(770) 455-7757 • Fax (770) 455-7271 • aaohn@aaohn.org

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.