http://www.akha.org/tetanustoxoid.htm
|
Updated 07/16/2001 23:04:55 |
z
z
z
|
Vaccines Non
Voluntary Vaccinations of Akha Women This
vaccination given twice to three times during pregnancy. hCG
Excerpted from Health Wars by
Phillip Day (www.credence.org) PHILLIP DAY?S REPORT ?
THE PAIN IN YOUR ARM (Part 2) An Overview of the
Question of Immunisation <snip> ?THE VACCINE AGAINST PREGNANCY?
[When hCG is combined with Tetanus
Toxoid it can cause confusion to the immune system and attack the natural
hormone [WHO Birth Control Vaccine Trials
use Tetanus Toxoid and hCG] On 21st January 1995,
Sister Mary Pilar Verzosa RGS, of Pro-Life "At present we
are doing research on the tetanus vaccines that were given The substance in
question found in the vaccine was human Chorionic >From this, most
would be led to believe that the presence of hCG in a Mega Vaccine Site: Arizona Vaccine
Information Network THE PAIN IN YOUR ARM
Excerpted from Health Wars by Phillip Day (www.credence.org) PHILLIP DAY?S REPORT ? THE PAIN IN YOUR ARM (Part 2) An Overview of the Question of Immunisation http://www.credence.org I am constantly asked what my views are on vaccination/immunisation and I
know this is a question that worries every parent. And so I would like to
feature some insights into this subject from my new book Health Wars, which I
hope will help you lay the matter to rest once and for all. It is my
considered opinion, after all the research I have done into this subject,
that immunisation represents one of the great medical frauds of our time.
When one sees how populations are frightened constantly by the threats of new
infectious epidemics, and how parents are coerced and terrorised into having
this unnatural, bizarre and ancient religious ritual performed on those they
love the most, and most disturbingly, how the deaths and maimings plainly
traceable to immunisation are swept under the carpet by a (mostly) complicit
media, one begins to get the true picture of how a highly profitable and
cynical industry is prepared to do or say almost anything to keep the global
arms outstretched, teeth bared and gritted ? and the needles going in. "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
- and hence clamorous to be led to safety - by menacing it with an endless
series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.? ? H L Mencken Today immunisation is colossal business. There is hardly an illness that
does not scare the pants off the public to the extent that they will sign on
for just about any immunisation program for themselves and their newborn
children. But in the Third World, a more sinister program has been underway. In
one of the opening chapters of this book, and also in World Without AIDS, we
have quoted industry?s abuse of drug prescription, immunisation and ?aid
distribution? in the developing nations and how these widespread and
government-sanctioned programs are causing appalling attrition among the
targeted populations. While none of us wishes to consider humanity?s greed
and desire for control at its worst, in summarily denying that such agendas
are planned and underway, we choose to ignore the clear, unequivocal body of
evidence. ?THE VACCINE AGAINST PREGNANCY? On 21st January 1995, Sister Mary Pilar Verzosa RGS, of Pro-Life
Philippines, Pandacan, Manila, wrote a letter to Judi Brown, President of the
American Life League. The letter contained an alarm, which has since been
sounded across the globe. Part of this letter reads as follows: "At present we are doing research on the tetanus vaccines that were
given last March 1994 by our Dept of Health to women of reproductive age.
Many of the women complained of bleeding (miscarriages) and allergies. We got
alarmed recently when we received communications from Magally Llaguno that
the vaccine in Mexico contained hCG... if you have enough [research] papers,
could your group do a press release via international press like Reuters so
that all countries could be alerted?"[1] The substance in question found in the vaccine was human Chorionic
Gonadotrophin. Professional pharmacologist Judith Richter writes thus:
"hCG is released by the fertilised egg cell soon after fertilisation and
continues to be produced by the placenta. It stimulates the corpus luteum in
the ovary to continue to produce progesterone." [2] From this, most would be led to believe that the presence of hCG in a
tetanus vaccine would actually have a beneficial effect on the overall health
of the female recipient. However, such hCG is not that of a pregnant woman's
own embryo and actually causes antibodies to be created that see the embryo
or foetus as a foreign body and repel it through miscarriage. Thus hCG acts
as a chemical abortion agent, and in the case of it being given to girls of
reproductive age who are not pregnant, hCG likewise causes prevention of all
fertilisations and therefore acts as a sterilising agent. Additionally,
according to medical researchers Dr Judith Richter, Dr George Isajiuw and
Robert Whelan[3], hCG suppresses the immune system and in certain cases may
cause the onset of opportunistic diseases if malnutrition and mineral
depletion are also in evidence. Sister Pilar wrote a second letter three months later on 16th April 1995:
"We are in the midst of a court battle regarding the anti-tetanus
vaccines used in the mass immunization of women of reproductive age.[4] The
vials we tested proved positive for beta-hCG, while the women had antibodies
against beta-hCG. This means their blood had built up antibodies against
pregnancy. The women we tested had miscarriages, stillbirth or premature
births. The government has all its forces against us - media is on their side
and we don't know how the judge will turn?" Johns Hopkins University, long a major player in the field of eugenics[5],
produced a report that as of 1990, 123 million women in developing countries
had been surgically sterilised. Further, JHU was also under contract to the
US Agency For International Development, according to the article 'Coming
Attractions: Phantom Sterilizations',[6] which also cites a report prepared
by the University on a proposed sterilisation program by vaccine. [7] That these programs are also underway in our own industrial societies is
all the more poignant and alarming when the human face of suffering is
imprinted over the antiseptic starkness of the facts: SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME (SIDS) The following excerpt comes from a statement made by a distraught
grandmother testifying before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources
(USA), regarding vaccination injury compensation: "My name is Donna Gary. I am a constituent of Senator [Edward]
Kennedy's from Massachusetts. Our family should have celebrated our very
first granddaughter's first birthday last month. Instead we will commemorate
the anniversary of her death at the end of this month. Our granddaughter, Lee Ann, was just eight weeks old when her mother took
her to the doctor for her routine check-up. This included of course her first
DPT inoculation and oral polio vaccine. In all her entire eight weeks of
life, this loveable, extremely alert baby had never produced such a
blood-curdling scream as she did at the moment the shot was given. Neither
had her mother ever before seen her back arch as it did while she screamed.
She was inconsolable. Even her daddy could not understand Lee Ann's
uncharacteristic screaming and crying. Four hours later, Lee Ann was dead. "Crib Death," the doctors
said. "SIDS" (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). "Could it be
connected to the shot?" her parents implored. "No." "But
she just had her first DPT shot this afternoon. Could there possibly be a connection
to it?" "No. No connection at all," the emergency room doctor
had told them definitely. "In the months before Lee Ann was born, I regularly checked with a
friend as to the state of her grandchild's condition. He is nearly a year and
a half older than Lee Ann. On his first DPT shot, he passed out cold for
fifteen minutes, right in the paediatrician?s office. "Normal reaction
for some children," the paediatrician reassured. The parents were scared
but knew what a fine doctor they had. They trusted his judgment. When it was time for the second shot, they asked, "Are you sure it's
all right?" Their paediatrician again reassured them. He told them how
awful it was to experience, as he had, one of his infant patient's bout with
whooping cough. That baby had died. They gave him the second shot that day. He became brain-damaged." In 1975, when Japan raised the age to receive vaccinations from 2 months
to 2 years, the incidence of cot death (SIDS) virtually disappeared in that
country.[8] In 1991, the Institute of Medicine released a report documenting
a causal relationship between the rubella vaccine and acute arthritis in
adult women. During that same year, links were found between this same
vaccine and chronic fatigue syndrome. In 1992, the World Health Organization
came under pressure and suspended use of a new measles vaccine when it was
found that children in Third World countries had an increased risk of dying
from other diseases in the years following administration of this vaccine,
due to a suppressed immune system. WHAT IS MY RIGHT WITH IMMUNISATION? Each member of the public must investigate the question of immunisation
thoroughly. This is so his undoubted later position against immunisation in
all its forms can be maintained on the basis of facts and not the prevailing
perceived wisdom of the highly profitable immunisation industry and its
associated coercion and terrorism of the public. Often mothers and fathers are put in extreme positions of coercion, the
doctor or relative saying, ?Well, Mrs Hawkins, if you do not get young Peter vaccinated,
and he gets meningitis, on your head be it.? Not having your child immunised
because of concerns for safety is enough in some countries to have the
parents put on a ?bad parents? register and their child denied access to
schools and education (?Because your non-immunised child could cause other
children to become ill and die, Mrs Hawkins.?) On the 15th February 2001, US media network NBC aired an episode of the
popular medical soap ?ER?. The television drama contained a storyline about a
family who chose not to vaccinate their children, and one of the children
contracts measles and dies from complications while the doctors on the show
lash out at the mother and categorically deny any risks posed by the vaccine.
The show provoked a rash of angry reactions from citizens, not least from the
parents of those children who had been maimed or killed by adverse
vaccination reactions. Leading vaccine critic Dr Joseph Mercola thinks there
are other related storylines NBC might be interested in following up: Serious adverse reactions to vaccines (I have a Microsoft Excel data base
of 25,000 adverse reactions to hepatitis B vaccine from the FDA and CDC
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, VAERS, available on request). The money trail: state agencies or school districts that get money for
forcing children to receive vaccines, and conflicts of interest that
compromise the "experts" who testify for mandates. CDC stonewalling
on requests for safety data on hepatitis B and other vaccines. Parents or other caregivers jailed for murder when their babies die,
possibly from a vaccine reaction, when there is no direct evidence that they
ever abused the child in any way. (Was a vaccine history taken in the English
nanny case, by the way?) Parents whose children are excluded from school and reported to Child
Protective Services because they have exercised a legal and conscientious
objection to a mandated vaccine (even against a disease such as hepatitis B
that is very rare in children and not ordinarily transmitted in a school
setting).[9] In the case of ?AIDS? of course, the dastardliness knows no bounds, as the
pharmaceutical industry smacks its lips at the thought of immunising millions
of ?vulnerable? Africans, Asians, Indonesians and Latin Americans from a
range of diseases, not caused by any ?HIV?, but because of poor sanitary
conditions and malnutrition, bringing on cholera, dysentery, malaria and
tuberculosis. Professor of the Athenian Faculty of Medicine, Leon Grigorski puts it this
way: "We are ourselves creating the diseases, and we are heading toward
general cancerization and mental defectives through encephalitis, by the use
of vaccines." [10] In Joyce Marshall?s view: ?Upon limiting access to information the
medical-industrial complex is able to maintain its authority mystique.
Isolation is a well-known technique of brainwashing. Choices that challenge
the position of the authority are limited and often times hidden. Because the
intellect learns by comparison, when it is presented with only one point of view
or other points of view are denigrated, it loses its capacity to discriminate
and ultimately its capacity for fully rational thought.? [11] Parents do have a choice, but often capitulate in the face of organised
establishment outrage. Decades ago, the unsinkable Herbert Shelton was abrupt
and dismissive of the public?s continued flirtation with immunisation. With
the fury felt by many of his day on the subject, Shelton sums up that ??this
criminal practice will end as soon as parents develop sufficient interest in
the welfare of their children. At present parents offer up their children on
the altars of the [vaccination] goddess, because commercial ghouls demand it,
and hope that the children will not be greatly injured. If a child is
invalided for life or is killed, the parents meekly accept the lying excuses
of the scoundrels who maim and murder children for money, cry a little, and
return to their movies and joy rides. Reader, do you know how Judas felt
after he had sold his master for a few pieces of silver? If you have
surrendered your child to be vaccinated and inoculated, after you learned the
truth, you know how he felt. There is one great difference between you and
him - Judas had decency enough to go out and hang himself.? [12] To be fair, many parents wish to avoid immunisation for their children,
but nevertheless go through with it to avoid the persecution that inevitably
follows. Medical community and friends and family alike make it very hard on
mothers and fathers who declare that they do not want to immunise their
children ?for the child?s sake?. However today pressure groups have formed,
to which dissenters may join, receiving a measure of comfort and security in
the knowledge that, despite the trials, they made a correct and caring decision.
The following piece comes from the Irish Republic: MMR - WHY DO SOME IRISH PARENTS REFUSE TO HAVE THEIR CHILDREN VACCINATED? Kathryn Holmquist looks at the growing resistance to immunisation: ?Many
of the parents who refuse to have their children vaccinated are informed,
articulate and independent thinkers with a suspicion of the medical
establishment. They do not want the State to dictate to them in the important
matter of their children's health. The State wants 95 per cent of children to be immunised against measles,
but the growing anti-vaccination movement is going to make that
near-impossible. In Britain, avid campaigners include the Allergy Induced
Autism Group, Jabs, the Informed Parent Group and the International
Vaccination Newsletter. In the US, where vaccination is mandatory for school enrolment, websites
disseminate information from vaccine dissenters. The Informed Parents
Vaccination homepage claims that the US Food and Drug Administration's
Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System receives about 11,000 reports of
serious adverse reactions to vaccination annually, some one per cent (112
cases) of which are deaths from vaccine reactions. It alleges that "both
national and international studies have shown vaccination to be a cause of
sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)?. In the Republic, the Informed
Immunisation Network was set up by parents who believe that they have a right
to be fully informed about the pros and cons of vaccination. The network
argues that the Department of Health gives only one point of view, in favour
of vaccination, when it should be presenting a balanced picture. "I am not an extremist but, based on the information I have, I am
happy with my decision not to have my children immunised," says Anne
Dunne, a member of the network.? [13] And in the United States: HOUSE DEBATES VACCINE SAFETY 5th August 1999: ?We can no longer keep our
heads buried in the sand like an ostrich pretending there is no problem,?
said Rep. Dan Burton, as he waved a sheath of documents he said showed
thousands of casualties over the last year. [14] DOCTORS DO NOT PROPERLY EXPLAIN SIDE-EFFECTS RISKS PRIOR TO GIVING
VACCINATIONS 40% of US physicians did not mention risks of the vaccines they were
administering, and 90% did not mention the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, according to a 2001 survey.[15] LEADING AMERICAN NUTRITIONIST SPEAKS OUT AGAINST MEASLES, MUMPS AND
RUBELLA (MMR) VACCINE Dr Joseph Mercola states: ?Children do NOT get sick and die from some bad,
scary virus unless they have some predisposing factors. The major ones would
be eating sugar and drinking soda and juice instead of water. I am absolutely certain that IF ANY child dies in the US from measles
complications there are many more children who die from the disease who WERE
vaccinated. It is true that measles can be fatal. Perhaps 1 in 1,000 children who gets
measles has complications, occasionally resulting in death. Measles is very
rare these days, but vaccinated children can get it too. Of cases reported in
Colorado between 1987 and 1998 (time interval probably chosen to include the
epidemic of 1989-90), 45 were in "exemptors," but 137 were in
vaccinated children (see JAMA of 12/27/00). In most cases, the source of the
infection was not known or stated, but it was probably not indigenous to the
U.S.? [16] And a remarkably candid front-page headline in the UK?s Mail on Sunday
reads as follows: MEASLES JAB: NEW LINK TO BRAIN DAMAGE. ?A Professor O?Leary, Director of
Pathology at Coombe Women?s Hospital in Dublin, provides compelling evidence
of an association between infection by the measles virus and autism in
children, many of whose parents said they developed the condition after they
had been injected with Measles Mumps Rubella vaccine or MMR?.? [17] While the Sunday Times reports: MORE MMR GRIEF IN BRITAIN ?One third of the members of a British government committee that has
advised that the MMR vaccine against measles, mumps and rubella is safe have
financial interests in drug companies that make the treatment. Twelve of the 36 members of the British Committee on Safety of Medicines
have financial links with the MMR manufacturers, whose products they have
given the all-clear on the basis of published research. Most members are
academics or medical experts who specialize in pharmacology. Five of them hold shares in the drug companies, or are paid consultants,
while another seven have received grants or sponsorship from them to fund
academic studies or clinical trials. All members declare their financial interests in a register and before
meetings. The chairman then decides whether they can participate in
discussions. Campaigners against the MMR vaccine, who fear it causes autism or bowel
disease in children, claim the financial links between drug watchdogs and the
pharmaceutical industry could lead to a conflict of interest. While the government and most of the medical establishment argue that the
vaccine is safe, research by Dr Andrew Wakefield, of the Royal Free Hospital,
London, claimed the trials leading to the MMR vaccine's adoption in Britain
were too brief to detect the feared complications.? [18] And in Japan: WHY JAPAN BANNED MMR VACCINE ?Japan stopped using the MMR vaccine seven years ago. Japan is virtually
the only developed nation to turn its back on the vaccine. Government health
chiefs claim a four-year experiment with it has had serious financial and
human costs. Of the 3,969 medical compensation claims relating to vaccines in the last
30 years, a quarter had been made by those badly affected by the combined
measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, they say. The MMR was banned in Japan in 1993 after 1.8 million children had been
given two types of MMR and a record number developed non-viral meningitis and
other adverse reactions were recorded.? [19] BUT WASN?T THE MMR VACCINE TESTED? PROMINENT SCIENTISTS ASSERT MMR VACCINE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN LICENSED IN
THE UK ?According to The London Sunday Herald, many prominent British researchers
are now convinced that the controversial MMR shot should never have been
licensed in the UK. This shocking assertion is to be made in an upcoming report to be
published in the journal Adverse Drug Reactions, the paper reports.[20] This
is of course assuming that UK health officials are not successful at
preventing the publisher from printing the article, as they have reportedly
attempted to do. Several senior clinicians, including a former senior professional medical
officer at the UK Department of Health, argue that the MMR should not have been
licensed back in 1988 because there was insufficient evidence of its safety
and the decision to license it was ?premature?."[21] Dr Peter Fletcher, who was a senior professional medical officer for the
UK Department of Health in the early 1980s, concurs with much of the
criticism of MMR: "Being extremely generous, evidence on safety was very thin, being
realistic there were too few patients followed-up for sufficient time. Three
weeks is not enough, neither is four weeks. On the basis that effective monovalent
vaccines were available, the Committee on the Safety of Medicines could be
confident that delay in granting a license would not result in a catastrophic
epidemic of measles, mumps and rubella. Caution should have ruled the day, answers to some important questions
should have been demanded and encouragement should have been given to conduct
a 12-month observational study on 10-15,000 patients and a prospective
monitoring program set up with a computerized primary care database. The
granting of a product license was definitely premature." [22] The Sunday Herald reports that someone from the Adverse Drug Reactions
journal said: "All the reviewers conclude that something needs to be done about MMR
and that there is a case to answer against the vaccine. The first thing this
paper says is that the MMR vaccine should not have been licensed. There was
not enough evidence of the safety to license it. The view is that the
evidence was inadequate." Dr John Griffin, editor of the Adverse Drug Reactions journal, is irate
over a letter he received from a government health official, which he says
tried to put him under pressure not to publish the potentially damaging MMR
paper: "I think this is an attempt to put pressure on me not to publish the
article and I resent that. We are going to publish the article. We are not
going to be deterred by threats. I think putting pressure on us not to
publish is despicable."[23] KNOW THE VACCINE?S CONTENTS The plain fact is, vaccines kill and maim regularly, yet very little is
publicly known about vaccine methodology or the substance of what is actually
being injected into the human system during the inoculation. This is not
altogether unsurprising. In the above case for example, Professor O?Leary was
immediately instructed by his employers not to give any further information
to the press.[24] Hepatitis B vaccine contains mercury, aluminium and formaldehyde. The
pertussus or whooping cough vaccine contains the same ingredients. Other
components found in common vaccines include parts of aborted foetuses, dog
and monkey kidneys, ethyl-glycol and carbolic acid (a full list of these
fillers is contained in the end section of this book). These vaccines are
then grown and strained through cultures. Cultures include monkey kidney,
chicken embryo, embryonic guinea-pig cells and, in the case of rubella,
Hepatitis A and chicken pox, dissected organs of aborted foetuses. Says one
concerned vaccine researcher, ?Would you mix this and feed it to your child
from a bottle? Yet the government requires it to be injected with a syringe
directly into our children?s bodies.? [25] To date, the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program or NVICP,
established in 1986, has paid out in excess of $1 billion in injury awards to
Western vaccine-recipients. And there are quite literally thousands of cases
pending. This despite the fact that the Health and Human Services Secretary
Donna Shalala narrowed the definition of vaccine damage to such an extent
that only immediate and severe reactions can now qualify. Seizures,
disorders, brain damage, ataxia, paralysis, learning difficulties and deaths
that occur many days or weeks following these vaccinations are now excluded.
Added to this, doctors have little incentive to report themselves to the government?s
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System or VAERS, prompting former director of
the FDA David Kessler to confess that ??only 10% of vaccine injuries are ever
reported.? [26] Lisa Jillani, of People Advocating Vaccine Education, has
observed the growing number of children now suffering from 20th Century
behavioural disorders, and reports: ?So the injuries can even conservatively amount to tens of thousands of
children, while doctors continue to diagnose and treat mysterious new
illnesses and maintain the ?one in a million? adverse reaction myth taught in
medical schools.? [27] A front-page article appeared in the UK Sunday Observer, dated 27th August
2000. The Observer obtained documents revealing that the UK government had
attempted to cover up 11 deaths of children as a result of receiving the
meningitis vaccine. The document also revealed that more than 16,000 adverse
reactions to the meningitis jab had been reported by GPs, since the
nationwide campaign began last year. With the UK Department of Health
admitting that only between 10 and 15 percent of adverse reactions are
reported, the actual number of children damaged as a result of this vaccine
is probably far higher. Notwithstanding the billions being made every year by the vaccine industry
in the face of such damaging effects of their products, opposition to the
mandatory use of vaccines is mounting, not least because there has never been
any impartial and empirical evidence that demonstrates even remotely that
immunisation does any good whatsoever. But in the short-term, while the
political chess-game is played out, there is much we can do to avoid the
misery and pitfalls of this errant arm of medicine. We can read up on the
subject using the many commendable books and organisations available. Then we
can come to our own informed decision based on all the evidence. This is a course of action tragically not followed by those heartbroken
families who have had to endure so much, falsely secure in the lie that the
immunisation system was there to improve their loved ones? health. We can
avoid these mistakes. Excerpted from Health Wars by Phillip Day (www.credence.org)
Here's Candace's resignation from the health agency she worked for. Subject: First Nations in the dark
vaccines / Resignation letter In Protest Over Canadian Government Vaccine Policy Candace Cooper, Nutrition Counselor Head Start Email:
slavenomore@excite.com Also to the Sto: Lo Nation
And Media I, Candace Cooper regretfully have to
resign from my position because What I truly see as being a sore spot for Xyolhemeylh is that I am not
a With my background knowledge I have learned about other alternative
healing So this brings me to the main reason that I believe I am being silenced
and The supervisor told me to stop giving out information and pass on
the A couple of months later a meeting with the nurses, supervisors, Ida
John After receiving the poster for Dr. Sheibner I was shocked at the
response I know the powers that be and there is so much information out today
from I want this to be clearly known that none of this is in any way to
speak One cultural advisor shared we need to bridge the gap between the
Sto:Lo So I must move on but will not stop speaking the TRUTH I will always be
a
Candace Cooper For the Public Health of the Sto:Lo Nation C.C: Sto:Lo Newspapers
Shared Vision magazine
Comman Radio Shows- Croft
Woodrow show - Susan Cameron Block show Copies of this letter will be personally hand delivered to every man, woman,
1) International Advocates for Health Freedom U.S.A.
- 2) National Vaccine Information Center –
http://www.909shot.com 3) Concerned Parents for Vaccine Safety 4) Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute –
http://thinktwice.com 5) Citizens Voice for Health Rights 6) Gary Null ( vaccination section)- 7) VRAN- Vaccine Reaction Awareness Network -Edda West There are many books written on vaccinations: Emerging Viruses, Aids and Ebola, Nature, Accident or
Intentional by Dr. _______________________________________________________ --- Sheri Nakken <vaccineinfo@b...> wrote: Subject: Re: Vaccination Genocide Exposed in Canada: Sto:lo First http://www.iahf.com > |
|
For documentation
on this issue please Contact
Me. |
©1997-2001 Akha Heritage Foundation
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.