Triple jab unsafe say US scientists (Sunday Express Jan
28, 2001)
Over half of autistic children has reaction to MMR vaccine
‘The £3m campaign to try to persuade parents MMR is safe
is extreme folly’
A LEADING scientist has produced fresh evidence that the
controversial measles, mumps and rubella vaccine could trigger autism in
children. A ground-breaking study of 80
autistic children found more than half had suffered an immune reaction to the
jab which may have damaged their brains.
The work, due to be published by world renowned immunologist Dr Vijendra
Singh, adds to growing concern that babies are being put at risk by the vaccine
- and casts fresh doubts on the Government’s claims that it is safe. The new research comes as a poll
commissioned for the Sunday Express shows overwhelming public support for our
campaign for the option of single vaccines. The NOP survey shows that 68 per
cent of the population want to see single vaccines made available for those
parents who do not want their children to have MMR.
In an exclusive interview with the Sunday Express, Dr
Singh, of the Department of Biology at Utah State University, said the new
findings were disturbing. “I strongly suspect MMR is not safe in certain
children whose immune systems can’t cope with it and this is causing autism.
This is a unique and disturbing finding and further illustrates that this
vaccine might not be safe.”
The research follows his previous study which showed that
exposing some babies to measles and herpes viruses could cause their immune
systems to malfunction.
His revelation comes as medical experts condemned the
Government’s multi-million pound campaign to persuade a sceptical public MMR is
safe. The Department of Health last
week launched a £3million publicity drive to persuade parents to inoculate
their children in the wake of growing evidence the vaccine might be harmful.
It based its message on new research from Finland which it
claimed “proved” there was no link between brain damage and MMR. However,
specialists from around the world have condemned this study as flawed and the
Government’s message as dangerous.
Dr Michel Odent, director of London’s Primal Health
Research Centre, urged the Government to fund a proper study. “The Government
have based their message on a study of no value which didn’t even address the
issue of autism. It is both immoral and unethical for them not to start a
proper study into this.”
Professor Roy Pounder, of the Royal Free Hospital in
London, accused the Department of Health of “spin”. He said the Government had
based its view on an unreliable report that provides little valuable
information about the safety of the MMR vaccination”.
S vaccine expert Dr Edward Yazback said: “What your
government is doing is very dangerous. if they want to prevent an outbreak then
they should make the single vaccine available. Why are they being so stubborn? “Most of these decision makers have never
taken care of a child with autism. I
have talked to hundreds of mothers whose children were developing normally until
they were inoculated.”
Jackie Fletcher, founder of pressure group JABS, which is
campaigning for single vaccines to be available on the NHS, said: “We have
parents who are so desperate to get single vaccines they are travelling to
other countries or paying extortionate prices to private doctors. The
Government says there is an epidemic on the doorstep because children aren’t
being inoculated. Why on earth don’t they give us the choice?”
The NOP survey of a thousand respondents also shows that
the Government campaign of reassurance may be too little, too late. About 66
per cent of people said they did not trust Government advice on health matters. And on Thursday, an online poll of nurses
found that two-thirds would not give their own children the controversial MMR
vaccine. The £3million campaign to
shore up the reputation of the MMR vaccine has received a mixed response. Some
health professionals are relieved that a clear message is now bring given. But
many scientists are furious that the money which could have funded at least two
extensive studies into MMR has been spent on a PR campaign.
The Department of Health has promised to be more open
about the side-effects. It is to produce new leaflets on the jab for parents,
which will not only warn of common side-effects such as rashes and fevers, but will
also cover more serious complaints such as seizures and severe shock. ONE in 1,000 children will have convulsions
after MMR and one in 100,000 will have severe allergic reactions. But the
Government points out that reactions to the diseases themselves are more
common. The Government’s determination
is causing increasing anger among parents.
Preparations are being made for protest marches in London, Edinburgh,
Dublin and Cardiff on April 28.
Bill Welsh, who has an autistic child, is organising the
March in Scotland. “It is just
incredible that the Government does not seem to have listened to parents,” he
said. “Most do not know how to register their anger or get their voice heard.”
It is still unclear why single
jabs are being described as less safe. David Salisbury, head of the Government’s
immunisation programme, said a year gap between jabs left children open to
disease. However, the Department of Health now admits it has no idea how long
the gap between jabs should be. And in
a direct contradiction of Dr Salisbury’s statement, the Public Health Laboratory
Service said it believes the wait needed between each jab is three weeks. Such
a short interval would virtually destroy the Government’s safety argument
against the single vaccines. S Contact numbers: JABS 01942 713565. Public
Health Laboratory Service: www.phls.co.uk or tel 0208 2001295.
“HI, hi, hi, hi,” a little voice says down the phone,
writes VICTORIA FLETCHER.
A large raspberry noise follows and then the receiver Is
handed back to his mother.
“That was Stephan,” Elaine Storey explains. “He’s a very
happy boy, very bright. You can see that he wants to say so much.” Elaine, from
Ashington in Northumberland, is one of thousands of parents whose children
changed after the MMR.
Stephan is six years old. “Hi”—is almost the only word he
can say since his development stopped aged two, just weeks after having the
jab. “It’s my fault. I didn’t know there
could be problems. I shouldn’t have let him have it,” Elaine explains. “I just
want him to be secure in the future when his parents aren’t about.”
Elaine, 46, has never talked about what happened and did
not now the same thing had occurred to other children. At the time, doctors
said it was just coincidence. But in private, they confided to her that MMR was
probably to blame but they could not say it on the record.
“His speech totally stopped,” Elaine explains. “He couldn’t
make himself understood. His development just totally ended. It Is like he is
lost inside a prison. It was so close to the MMR that I just wondered if there
could be a connection.”
The Sunday Express has -launched a campaign to call for
the reintroduction of single immunisation and has highlighted the cases of a
number of families who believe the jab caused side-effects, including autism.
These include Rory Adams, eight, who suffers from autism
and an incurable bowel disease; toddler Holly Lewis who stopped breathing hours
after the MMR and who has been confirmed as autistic, and 18-month-old Alex
Haydock, who two weeks after his jab, started with diarrhoea, high temperatures
and a rash. He is being assessed for autism.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.