http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7303/10/d
|
|||||||
|
|
Annabel Ferriman BMJ
Patients need to be more involved in decisions about their health care, a
new publication from the Institute for Public Policy Research said last week.
Research from the Picker Institute Europe, which was used in the compilation
of the report, showed that more patients in the United Kingdom felt excluded
from such decision making than elsewhere in Europe and the United States (see
graph).
The report, some of whose findings were published in the BMJ last
week (30 June, p 1564), said that several changes were needed to develop a more
equal partnership between professionals and patients:
· Paternalistic attitudes had to
stop
· Professionals’ communication
skills had to improve
· Professionals needed training in
the special skills required to ensure a shared decision making approach
· Patients needed decision aids that
provided information about treatment options and outcomes relevant to their own
health status; such aids were available as interactive videos, computer
programmes and audiotapes, and printed materials.
"One mechanism for encouraging a more equal relationship between patients
and professionals would be to involve patients in professionals’ training
throughout their careers," the report added.
Projects are already being developed to explore how this might be put into
practice in Lewisham, south London, whereby professionals are educated about
the patients’ perspective in, for example, cardiac care and mental health. Age
Concern is also working with local NHS trusts to train staff to communicate
more effectively the highly sensitive issues around resuscitation with older patients
and their relatives and carers.
The report also showed that many members of the public thought that genetic
medicine "messes with nature" and were opposed to genetic testing for
specific disease (30 June, p 1564).
The Future Patient, by Liz Kendall,
is available from the Institute for Public Policy Research, 30-32 Southampton
Street, London WC2E 7RA.
|
|||||||
|
|
NEWS ROUNDUP
Public thinks genetic testing is "a step too far".
Cherrill Hicks
BMJ 2001 322: 1564.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.