http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7305/129/a

 

BMJ 2001;323:129 ( 21 July )

News roundup

Blue Cross to reward doctors for patients' satisfaction

Fred Charatan Florida

Blue Cross of California, one of the United States's largest health maintenance organisations, with 2.2 million members, has become the first commercial health maintenance organisation to pay bonuses to its 20 000 doctors on the basis of patients' satisfaction and other quality standards, instead of only rewarding doctors who cut costs.

In the past, most health maintenance organisations paid bonuses to doctors who were able to keep medical costs down compared with their peers. Critics claimed that such bonuses encouraged doctors to skimp on patient care.

Blue Cross of California will eliminate bonuses based on cost containment. Instead, it will begin rewarding doctors for patients' satisfaction. It will survey patients, monitor their grievances, and interview patients when they switch doctors to determine why.

The new system will also reward doctors who use preventive healthcare measures—including screening for breast and cervical cancer and programmes to help patients with asthma and heart disease—and who are successful in persuading patients to stop smoking.

The bonuses will be up to 10% of the monthly capitation fee that Californian health plans typically pay their doctors for each enrolled member.

However, healthcare industry watchdogs were sceptical of the move, which comes amid congressional debate over the patients’ bill of rights. Dr Sidney Wolfe, director of the health research group of Public Citizen (a Washington based, non-profit making consumers group), said that he doubted if Blue Cross of California’s policy change was more than cosmetic.

He believed that in the profit making health maintenance organisations, fiduciary responsibility to stockholders outweighed good intentions to reward doctors for satisfying patients and enhancing the quality of health care.

A spokesman for Blue Cross said that competition prompted the new policy, which is not expected to cost more. "We believe that if you promote improving the quality of the care . . . and patient outcomes, that will result in cost effective care," said Dr Robert Crocker, a senior vice president of Blue Cross.

Pacific Business Group on Health, a coalition that represents California’s major employers on healthcare issues, hailed the organisation’s move as a step towards more transparency and better incentives for the industry.
 

Abridged text of this article

PDF [abridged] of this article

Send a response to this article

Download to Citation Manager

Search Medline for articles by:
Charatan, F.

Alert me when:
New articles cite this article

Collections under which this article appears:
Organization of health care


ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.