http://www.observer.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,518459,00.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Baby
deaths may be linked to toxic vaccine Some experts believe
that this may be the reason why a number of children died and dozens of
others suffered permanent brain damage after being vaccinated in the late
1960s and early 1970s. Last night MPs demanded a full inquiry. An Observer
investigation can reveal that: • Two batches of
Wellcome's whooping cough vaccine, which were more than 14 times more potent
than the British standard dose, were given to GPs in Britain and injected
into babies; • 14 other batches
containing thousands of vaccine doses were not put through a crucial toxicity
test. One of the toxic batches
now known to have been injected into British babies was the same batch that
led the Irish Supreme Court in 1992 to award £2.7 million in compensation to
Kenneth Best, a Cork boy who suffered permanent brain damage. At the time the Irish
judge accused Wellcome of negligence and attacked the company's poor quality
control at its Kent laboratory. Now, nine years after
the award, the Irish Department of Health has received details from Glaxo
SmithKline, as it is now known, about the batch - numbered 3741 - and is
tracing 296 Irish children who were inoculated with it. Pressure from Denis
Naughten, a senior Irish MP, has forced other disclosures from Glaxo
SmithKline, including the fact that a second batch of vaccine, numbered 3732,
produced by Wellcome around the same time, was even more potent than that used
on Best in 1968. In the three years after Wellcome produced the toxic
batches, dozens of British parents believed their children suffered brain
damage or even died as a result of the whooping cough vaccine. But their views were
dismissed by drug companies and health officials, who insisted the vaccine
was safe and important in stamping out a dangerous disease. Official figures show
that reports of adverse reactions during this period soared and a number of
babies died hours after receiving their jab. Gordon Stewart, emeritus
professor of public health at Glasgow University, has described the
revelations as 'scandalous'. Stewart, who in 1984 was asked by the
government's Chief Scientific Officer to investigate a link between brain
damage and the vaccine, said he advised the Department of Health about these
potential toxic batches in 1989 but they did not act. His report, which was
never published by the government but has been seen by The Observer, is
highly critical of the whooping cough vaccine used at this time which he
believes was too toxic. Ian Stewart, Labour MP and chair of the all-party
Commons committee on vaccine issue, last night said he would be holding an
emergency meeting of the committee this week and tabling a series of
parliamentary questions. He said: 'The families need to know the truth. If it
can be shown that Glaxo Wellcome were negligent in allowing toxic vaccines to
be used, then the company must face up to its responsibilities.' The families of
vaccine-damaged children receive £100,000 compensation from the government
fund financed by the taxpayer. Stewart believes if the firm is at fault, then
they should pay compensation which would be significantly more. Olivia Price of the
Vaccine Victims Support Group said the revelations were 'an utter scandal'.
She said: 'These are our children who have had promising lives destroyed. It
is now up to the company to give us the information we need.' A spokesman for Glaxo
Smithkline said: 'GSK does not accept that these batches were harmful.' A spokeswoman for the
Department of Health said: 'Repeated examination of the evidence that DTP
[whooping cough] vaccine used in the UK is linked to brain damage has failed
to demonstrate a causal link.' |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers
Limited 2001
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.