http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,59-2002017995,00.html
|
FRIDAY JANUARY 11 2002 |
|
|
|
The MMR
vaccine |
|
|
|
FROM DR
RICHARD NICHOLSON |
|
|
|
Sir, There is a particular
hypocrisy in ministers using the shield of medical confidentiality to avoid
saying whether their children have had the MMR vaccine (letters, December 28;
January 2 and 5). Just before the general election last May, they rushed
through the Health and Social Care Act, which effectively destroys medical
confidentiality in the NHS. Section 60 gives the Secretary of State power to
have identifiable patient information disclosed to whomever he wishes, if it
is in the public interest. So ministers want to be able to override the
confidentiality of other people’s medical records whenever it suits them, but
to retain the confidentiality even of non-sensitive parts of their children’s
records. Since childhood vaccination is not a unique experience, but one that
almost all children have, information on it is not sensitive in the same way
as the records of individual illnesses. Moreover, it is in the public interest to know
whether ministers believe their own propaganda about the complete safety of
MMR, on which many millions of pounds have been spent, since they are
expected to provide leadership. Their reluctance to say whether their
children have had MMR inevitably leads to the suspicion that they have not,
and acts against the public interest by discouraging other parents. Yours sincerely, |
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.