http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4325636,00.html
|
How
seeds of doubt were sown by doctor Long battle to quell fear over
controversial theory left department Sarah Boseley, health
editor Monday December 24,
2001 Seeds of doubt over the
safety of the combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine were planted in
1998 by the researcher Andrew Wakefield at the Royal Free hospital, who was
backed in some aspects of what he said, but not all, by colleagues. The Department of
Health, the public health laboratory service and the medical research council
have expended much time and effort over three years to establish that there
is nothing for parents to fear, but the genie firmly refuses to go back in
the bottle. Dr Wakefield's field of
research was the gut. He became concerned when he saw a small number of
children suffering from Crohn's disease - which inflames the bowel - who had
also developed autism some time after they were given their MMR innoculation.
The vaccination is usually administered before the second birthday, which is
also when autism first becomes apparent. Dr Wakefield, however, believes
there is a connection. His 1998 paper, which
was published in the Lancet - the journal has taken a lot of flak from some
scientific quarters because of its decision to run it - focused on 12
children with gut disorders, nine of whom were also autistic. Eight out of
the nine started to show a loss of developmental skills after the MMR jab and
one after catching measles. The paper acknowledged
that the link was no more than a theory. "We did not prove an
association between MMR vaccine and the syndrome described," it said.
The Lancet also ran two critical commentaries from US experts in the same
edition. But despite the caution, the idea was out and it has proved im
possible for health officials to assuage public fears. Dr Wakefield has
continued to pursue this line of research and recently left the Royal Free
where tensions had developed over his work. Timing alone - the fact
that parents noticed developmental problems in their children shortly after
the MMR jab when they may have been looking for an explanation - is not proof
of any link. Much of Dr Wakefield's work before the Lancet publication had
focused on whether measles virus was responsible for an increase in Crohn's
disease. Scientists from the PHLS say that he has not established that
measles virus can cause bowel disease, let alone that it can cause autism. The Royal Free group
claimed that they found measles virus in inflammatory bowel tissue affected
by Crohn's disease, but other scientists could not replicate the results. Dr Wakefield's theory
was that MMR vaccine might damage the bowel, causing lesions through which
opioid chemicals occurring in the bowel could escape. Opioids, it is
suggested, might reach the brain and affect development. But his opponents say
there is no evidence that this can or does happen. They claim that the
epidemiological evidence is also against the theory. There has been a steep
rise in cases of autism, but the PHLS which collects the data on the
prevalence of disease in the UK, says the rise began 10 years before the MMR
was widely introduced in 1988, and that when every child began to be
vaccinated, there was no significant change in the incidence of autism. But however much
evidence the Department of Health puts out against the Royal Free theories,
the row over the MMR refuses to die down. The crisis in confidence has been
made worse because of the issues over individual rights raised by the government's
refusal to allow parents to have the three vaccines given separately. Dr
Wakefield, launching his 1998 Lancet paper, suggested it might be better to
have them separately, although his colleagues disagreed. Parents have latched on
to this idea as a means of safeguarding their child, in spite of all the
evidence assembled by the Department of Health to prove the three vaccines do
not interact. The government refuses to budge, on the grounds that a child
who is given one vaccine is left exposed for longer to the other diseases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.