Families Seek Compensation for Alleged Vaccine Harm
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20020107/hl/vaccine_2.html Monday January 7 10:18 AM ET Families Seek Compensation for Alleged Vaccine Harm
By Richard Woodman LONDON (Reuters Health) - More than 1,000 British families have joined a
legal battle for millions of pounds compensation for harm they claim was caused
to their children by measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccines, their
solicitors said on Monday. The case--which is scheduled to come to trial in February 2003--follows controversial
research findings suggesting that use of the vaccines could be linked to
inflammatory bowel disease and autism. Two firms of solicitors, Alexander Harris and Freethcartwright, have been
appointed as the joint leading firms in the generic litigation against Aventis
Pasteur MSD, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck. A spokeswoman at Alexander Harris said that the firm represented about 1,000
families while the total number involved was probably around 1,500. She said
likely levels of compensation varied but could be worth several million pounds
for children with serious brain damage. The firm's Web site says that the case is being brought under the Consumer
Protection Act--part of the European Union (news
- web
sites)'s Product Liability Directive that imposes liability on
manufacturers of products for any injury caused by an unsafe product. The
families had been granted public funds to pay for the legal action. The firm said that the UK Department of Health stopped using SmithKline
Beecham's Pluserix and Aventis Pasteur MSD's Immaravax in 1992, two years after
a similar vaccine containing the Urabe strain of mumps vaccine virus was
withdrawn in Canada after reports of meningitis. ``After we had been contacted by several hundred families a clear pattern
began to emerge,'' the solicitors said. ``Children who were developing well,
both physically and intellectually, before the vaccine, regressed after
vaccination, often accompanied by other symptoms and a gradual decline into
autism.'' They added: ``It is important to stress that we appear to be dealing with
cases where the children, who were fit and well before being vaccinated and
were developing normally in every way, are now chronically ill and as a result
many are seriously mentally or physically disabled.'' A spokesman for GlaxoSmithKline said that all the manufacturers were still
trying to clarify exactly what was being alleged by the families. He added that
numerous studies had failed to show a link between MMR vaccination and autism,
and that the legal action would be defended. The Department of Health and the Medical Research Council have also
dismissed reports by researchers at London's Royal Free Hospital suggesting
that the triple vaccine may trigger autism. ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER. |