http://www.usatoday.com/life/health/general/lhgen115.htm
|
11/08/00- Updated 02:29 PM
ET |
|
|
|
|
Drugs found in tap water
Teen finds antibiotics in public supplies By Kathleen Fackelmann, USA TODAY High school student Ashley Mulroy was reading a science magazine two years
ago when she learned that European scientists had made a disturbing
discovery: Drugs of all kinds, including antibiotics, were flowing in rivers,
streams, groundwater and even in tap water. That began a science project in which the 17-year-old searched for and
found antibiotics in the Ohio River. She also found those drugs in the
drinking water in her hometown of Wheeling, W.Va. She is one of the first in
the USA to look for such drugs in the nation's drinking water supply. Mulroy's work recently won the Stockholm Junior Water Prize, an
international science competition sponsored by ITT Industries. More
important, her study highlights an emerging scientific issue with alarming
implications. Some experts fear that even low levels of antibiotics fouling the nation's
water supply may help create superbugs: microorganisms that have evolved to
survive an antibiotic's lethal assault. Public health experts already have noted the rise of infection after
infection that cannot be stopped with the usual arsenal of antibiotics. And the superbugs may be causing "tens of thousands" of deaths
in the USA each year, says Abigail Salyers, an expert on antibiotic
resistance at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Consider these reports:
These findings "raise a big red flag," says Stuart Levy at Tufts
University in Boston. The antibiotics aren't harmful on their own. Rather,
Levy and others worry that waters laced with these drugs could breed bugs
that can shrug off the killing effects of the wonder drugs, such as penicillin. Mulroy's science project got started after she read "Drugged
Waters," a 1998 article in Science News that gave a chilling
account of the drugs, including antibiotics, floating in European waters. "I remember thinking the story had really bad implications,"
Mulroy says. So she decided to test for antibiotics in the Ohio River near
her home. Over a 10-week period, Mulroy and her mom got into the family car and
drove for miles to test sites along the Ohio River. In the end, she got her river water samples back to the Linsly School, a
private school that she attended in Wheeling . She looked for three common
antibiotics: penicillin, tetracycline and vancomycin. She found all three
drugs in low concentrations (parts per trillion) in the Ohio River. Water
samples taken from sites near livestock or dairy farms had the highest
concentrations of antibiotics, Mulroy says. Large farming operations in the USA often keep hogs, chickens and other
animals in crowded, dirty pens and rely on low doses of antibiotics to keep
diseases at bay. Antibiotics also are given to healthy animals to fatten them
for market. Scientists know that antibiotics given to animals (or to humans) don't get
fully metabolized in the digestive system and end up being excreted. In a
farming operation, that waste can make it into the runoff or groundwater,
which eventually makes it into a nearby stream, and in this case, the Ohio
River. River samples taken near local hospitals also revealed antibiotics, albeit
at slightly lower concentrations, Mulroy says. Antibiotics may leach into the
groundwater around hospitals if cases or bottles of expired drugs are dumped
into a landfill, she says. Do such drugs get into water flowing out of the kitchen tap? Mulroy's
study suggests that they do. Mulroy also took samples of water from three taps in Wheeling, Moundsville
and Procter. All three, including water from the drinking fountain at her
school, were contaminated with the antibiotics in question. The
concentrations were less than those found in the river water, she says. Water flowing from the Wheeling tap comes from a municipal water-treatment
facility that relies on sand filtration to clean the water. That method, the
primary method of water treatment in the USA, doesn't remove antibiotics or
other drugs from the water. The other two samples of public water came from wells. The fact that they
also had antibiotics suggests that groundwater is contaminated, Mulroy says. However, Mulroy's study also suggests a potential fix for waters laced
with drugs such as antibiotics. She says that an activated charcoal
filtration system removed most of the antibiotics in the tap water. Agricultural effect The USA produces more than 50 million pounds of antibiotics each year.
Experts estimate that 60% are used to treat humans. The other 40% go to
farming operations. New research suggests that the latter doesn't stay on the farm. Joseph Bumgarner at the EPA, Michael Meyer at the U.S. Geological Survey
and their colleagues have identified antibiotic contamination of surface
water near two North Carolina hog farms. Such farms, which often keep 50,000
animals in close quarters, create huge pools of manure called
"lagoons." These hogs routinely receive doses of antibiotics, including
chlortetracycline, lincomycin and sulfamethiazine. Sure enough, the team
found those three antibiotics in the lagoons and in samples from nearby
streams, which empty into the Neuse River. The river water samples also contained the antibiotics, Bumgarner says.
The Neuse River supplies the Raleigh-Durham area with its public water. The
researchers have yet to test the tap water there. The team did find an antibiotic flowing from a tap on one of the hog
farms. That tap drew its water from a well, a finding that suggests
groundwater is laced with the drugs, Meyer says. Preliminary results from this study also suggest that bacteria in the
streams have acquired resistance to common antibiotics, Bumgarner says. Studies on a hog farm in Iowa and a chicken farm in Ohio produced similar results,
Meyer says. Some experts, including Karen Florini of the Environmental
Defense in Washington, D.C., are urging the Food and Drug Administration to
ban the use of antibiotics to speed the growth of farm animals. Recently, the FDA took a step in that direction by announcing its intent
to ban two antibiotics used by poultry farmers. Florini's group and others
also are calling on EPA to control the pollution in runoff from
factory-farming operations. But EPA's Bumgarner says the agency doesn't have
enough information to take such a step. Worrisome findings Human waste also contains antibiotics, and instead of going into a lagoon,
it gets flushed down the toilet. EPA chemist Tammy Jones-Lepp wanted to find
out whether the antibiotics in sewage would survive a wastewater-treatment
facility. Jones-Lepp collected water downstream from two such facilities in an
unnamed southern city. She found that the treated river water contained low
levels of azithromycin, an antibiotic often prescribed to children for ear
infections. The results suggest that treatment plants, although they filter out some
contaminants, don't remove all traces of drugs such as antibiotics. Effects still unknown "It's clear antibiotics get into the environment," says Tamar
Barlam, director of the Antibiotic Resistance Project at the Center for
Science in the Public Interest in Washington, D.C. But scientists have yet to
determine the impact of such contamination on human health, especially when
the antibiotics, and other drugs, are present at minute levels, she says. David Bell at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta
says there's not enough scientific data to say that environmental
contamination plays a big role in generating antibiotic resistance. Far more important, he says, is the fact that humans have abused
antibiotics by taking them unnecessarily. The overuse of antibiotics by the agricultural industry also plays a big
role in creating superbugs, Bell says. Farmers who feed healthy animals a steady stream of antibiotics can set
the stage for human illness in this way: Bacteria in the digestive system of
the animal can develop resistance to antibiotics. Humans who then eat
undercooked meat from the infected animal can suffer an infection — one that
can't be treated with that antibiotic, Bell says. Levy and others would argue that environmental contamination might pose a
more serious problem than previously recognized. Levy says those relatively
harmless bugs, like the E. coli in Mulroy's study, can develop genetic traits
to repel antibiotics. Once they have that genetic ammunition, they can trade
the information to other bugs relatively easily, he says. That means that a bug that doesn't cause human disease could pass along
its genetic trick to a bug that does. The result, Levy worries, would be a
bacterium that has evolved the capability to do an end-run around the most
powerful drugs of the modern century. The USA lags about a decade behind researchers in Europe who have found
antibiotics and many other drugs in the waters there. Indeed, Mulroy's study
is one of the first to look at the public water supply in the USA. Although other scientists must confirm her study, Mulroy has contributed
something important to the field. "This really is a testimony to our kids," Levy says. For information on the Stockholm Junior Water Prize, see the Web site of
the Water Environment Federation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Front
Page News Money Sports Life Tech Weather Shop Terms of service Privacy Policy How to advertise About us © Copyright 2001
USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc. |
||
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.