Yahoo! Groups

My Groups | AutismFirstStepsAutismNewsletter Main Page




 
AUTISM FIRST STEPS
AUTISM DAILY NEWSLETTER     
Sunday January 6, 2002  


INDEX:
*    Critical Period For Acquiring Non-Verbal Language
*   
Medical Research Council review sets research agenda for autism
*   
Study finds there's a critical time for learning all languages, including
      sign language

*   
District evaluates full inclusion

*
*****************************

Critical Period For Acquiring Non-Verbal Language


Neuroscientists examining the brain activity of people who learned to speak American Sign Language (ASL) at different times in their lives have found the first evidence that there is a critical period for acquiring a non-verbal language, just as there is for spoken languages.Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the researchers discovered patterns of brain activity in bilingual people who learned ASL before puberty differed from those who learned it after puberty.The findings are reported in this month's issue of the journal Nature Neuroscience. They indicate there are regions in the brain's right hemisphere that are activated when children who learned ASL before puberty are reading sign language. The brains of children who learned ASL after puberty show significantly less right hemisphere activity when they are doing the same activity.There is widespread acceptance among neuroscientists that there is a critical period for first language acquisition, and that children who are not exposed to any language before puberty, or perhaps sooner, are unable to fully acquire and use the principles of language. There also is evidence of similar critical periods for acquiring a second language."We know that late learners of ASL, while they are very fluent, never will be fully fluent like native, or early, learners of ASL," said David Corina, a University of Washington associate professor of psychology and a co-author of the study. Corina is fluent in ASL."One aspect of ASL that is difficult for late learners is verb signs of motion. You see some subtle errors in their use of these verbs, just as you might detect subtle grammatical differences when listening to bilingual users of a spoken language when they are not using their native tongue."Other members of the research team are Aaron Newman, a University of Oregon doctoral student; Helen Neville, University of Oregon psychology professor; Daphne Bavelier, assistant professor of brain and cognitive sciences at the University of Rochester, and Peter Jezzard, a physicist at John Radcliffe Hospital in England.The new study builds on earlier work by this research team showing that right hemisphere activity, along with activation in the left hemisphere, is necessary for processing ASL. The left hemisphere activity has long been associated with the processing of spoken languages."One area of the brain that is the signature, or specific, to signers if they learned ASL as a native signer, is the right angular gyrus," Corina said.It is located at the juncture of the temporal and parietal lobes. Activation of the left angular gyrus has been associated with reading English and other spoken languages for many years. The new study shows consistent activation of the right angular gyrus among native signers and some, but not consistent, activation of that brain region among late signers.The study involved 27 bilingual subjects. Sixteen were hearing persons born to deaf parents. They learned ASL and English from birth as native languages. The remaining 11 were the late learners who had English as their native language and learned ASL after puberty, in early adulthood. All of the subjects watched a screen while their brains were imaged using fMRI and were asked to read written English sentences and meaningless strings of consonants. They also were shown and asked to read ASL sentences and meaningless gestures that were similar to real ASL signs."This work is important because we want to understand the neural systems underlying language," said Corina. "We want to know if they are malleable or fixed and the degree to which they may vary in different languages. We now know there is activation in the right hemisphere when native signers view ASL, and to see that this is dependent on early exposure suggests there are specific times when neural systems for language may be particularly sensitive to change."He added that the research has implications for early education of all children because it stressed the need for early language exposure at critical times in development. And now, it is equally important in education for the deaf to ensure linguistic competency in ASL.The National Institute of Deafness and Communicative Disorders, the National Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada, the Charles A. Dana Foundation and a University of Oregon postgraduate scholarship funded the research. - By Joel Schwarz


[Contact: David Corina, Helen Neville, Joel Schwarz]

http://unisci.com/stories/20021/0104026.htm

******************************

Medical Research Council review sets research agenda for autism


Susan Mayor, London The Medical Research Council has published a major review of research which reveals that the prevalence of autism is higher than had been thought but indicates no association with the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination.The review was commissioned by the Department of Health in March 2001, partly in response to public concerns raised by research alleging that MMR vaccination might be linked to an apparent increase in the numbers of children with autism. It was designed to be a wide ranging review of research into different aspects of autism and other disorders in the autism spectrum, to identify gaps in knowledge and to make recommendations on future research in the United Kingdom. Three groups of scientists examined the research evidence and assessed the strength of knowledge based on research in epidemiology and case definition; physiology and infection; and psychology and behaviour. For the first time in a research review by the council there was extensive input from the outset from lay people, who put forward questions that reflected the concerns of parents of children with autism. The report found that autism was more prevalent than had previously been thought: around six in 1000 young children have a disorder in the autism spectrum. Carol Dezateux, clinical reader in epidemiology at the Institute of Child Health at Great Ormond Street NHS Trust and chairwoman of the review’s epidemiology subgroup, said: "This estimate makes autism spectrum disorders far more common than was previously generally recognised."Most of the apparent increase was considered by the reviewers to have resulted from changes in case definition, as well as increased awareness of the condition. The reviewers thought it most likely that autism results from several causes, but they argued that the strongest evidence was for a genetic component. They said: "It seems likely that several genes interact to create susceptibility to the disorder. The interplay between genetic and environmental factors is also likely to play a key role but the nature of these interactions is not yet known." It was concluded that current evidence did not support the link between MMR and autism spectrum disorders. The review was chaired by Professor Eve Johnstone, who is also chairwoman of the council’s neurosciences and mental health research board. She said, "The report has identified some successes in research into autism but there is still a long way to go to better understand these disorders." She added: "The participation in this review of people with autism, their carers, and people with experience of support groups has enriched both the process and its outputs. Further partnerships which give lay organisations access to scientific expertise and give scientists access to lay perspectives can only be of benefit." For the future, the report recommends building on the existing strengths of research into autism by improving coordination between different research disciplines and improving research training in service settings. It also called for more research on the definition of autism spectrum disorders, especially in adults, noting that such research is "crucial both for future research and for provision of services" for people with the disorder. More basic biological research studies were also suggested—an acknowledgement that there is still a lot of uncertainty about the biological processes involved in autism, in the brain as well as other organs. Large population studies were proposed, to address questions about environmental risks and their interaction with genetic factors. The council is now discussing with the Department of Health how to act on these proposals.Dr Dezateux concluded that progress in autism research would depend on adequate funding.The Medical Research Council’s review of autism research is available on its website: www.mrc.ac.uk
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7328/10/b
******************************
Screening for inherited metabolic disease in newborn infants using tandem mass spectrometry

Further assessment of performance and outcome is needed
Although individually rare, inborn errors of metabolism represent a potentially preventable cause of death and disability. Screening for phenylketonuria (birth prevalence 10 per 100 000) was introduced in the United Kingdom over 30 years ago. It has proved successful in preventing severe mental retardation. The development of tandem mass spectrometry enables a wide variety of additional compounds to be assayed on the dried blood spots routinely collected from newborn infants.1 The combined birth prevalence of disorders, excluding phenylketonuria, which could be detected by screening is about 20 per 100 000. Of these, medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency is one of the most important. However, despite experience of screening over a million infants, many questions about screening for this disorder remain unanswered. In the United Kingdom between 5 and 11 per 100 000 live born infants have medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, which is about 35 to 70 children each year.2 This recessively inherited disorder classically presents during infancy and early childhood with a severe illness characterised by encephalopathy and hypoglycaemia. This is usually precipitated by a minor febrile illness, particularly gastroenteritis, and fasting. Of those presenting clinically, up to a quarter will die and about a third of survivors will have irreversible neurological damage. 3 4 In a significant proportion there is a history of previous sudden unexplained death or encephalopathy in a sibling. 4  However, the presentation varies widely, with some individuals not presenting until they are adults and an unknown number remaining undiagnosed or asymptomatic. In people of northern European descent, over 80% of clinically diagnosed patients are homozygous for one mutationG985A. Simple heterozygotes have no symptoms. The mainstay of treatment is a high carbohydrate diet, orally or intravenously during fasting or intercurrent infection. 5 This seems to be effective, with few of the 162 children reported in the two largest series having further episodes of encephalopathy. 3 6 The outcome for siblings diagnosed prospectively also seems good.6 Given this clinical course and response to treatment, medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency has been identified as a potential candidate for early detection through newborn screening. 7 8 Several centres outside the United Kingdom have introduced newborn screening for medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency by using tandem mass spectrometry to measure acyl carnitines.9 Carpenter et al have recently reported identifying 11 babies with definite medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency among 275 000 screened, a birth prevalence of 4 per 100 00010which was lower than expected. Their publication highlights many of the questions and uncertainties that remain about performance and outcome. Differences in the choice of metabolite as well as in thresholds used to define a positive result limit direct comparison of test performance between centres. A further issue is the criteria used to confirm a diagnosis of medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. In one study from the United States 62 infants were considered to have medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency solely on the basis of "pathological acyl carnitine profiles."9 By contrast, Carpenter et al applied explicit independent diagnostic criteria to 23 infants with positive screening results and diagnosed definite medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in 11, with one further probable mild case.10 A striking finding in this report is that of the remaining 11 babies who screened positive but did not meet the diagnostic criteria for medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (false positives), four died in the neonatal period. This is consistent with observations that infants and young children who are ill for any reason may have abnormal patterns of acyl carnitines.11 In a retrospective study based on 100 600 dried blood spots, all but one of those with false positive results were preterm babies.12 The false negative rate is difficult to determine, as none of the prospective studies included a rigorous scheme to identify those who might have escaped detection. Babies who have rapidly become carnitine depleted may be missed. It is already clear that newborn screening identifies some individuals whose history is not known and who may be treated unnecessarily. In both the Australian and the US study the frequency of the common mutation was lower than expected, and the proportion of A985G heterozygotes higher. 9 10 To be maximally effective screening needs to be done and acted on very soon after birth. Up to one third of those with medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency have been reported to present in the first three days of life,4 and this may be an underestimate since the diagnosis is easily missed. Appropriate samples need to be collected from all sick newborn infants, including those who die. Detection and timely diagnosis will also depend on the age at which screening is undertaken. In all the prospective studies reported to date the screening specimen was collected between the second and third day of life, considerably earlier than in the United Kingdom, where this is generally collected between the sixth and tenth day. However, bringing forward the age at screening in the United Kingdom may influence test performance for other conditions that share the same screening infrastructure. Ensuring that screening improves outcome will depend on the timely delivery of high quality clinical services to babies and their families. This is a considerable challenge, especially since there is a shortage of clinicians with training in paediatric metabolic medicine. Judgments about the effectiveness of screening need to be informed by prospective data on mortality, neurological outcome, and cognitive function. Additionally the impact of screening and treatment on the families of infants with true, borderline, and false positive diagnoses needs to be taken into account. Despite increasing experience of screening for medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, there has been no report of a systematic follow up of longer term outcome in affected infants detected by screening. Randomised trials of screening for rare disorders are difficult, but observational data from largescale prospective collaborative studies can provide information on test and programme performance and clinical outcome to guide policy decisions. 7 13 These require a coordinated strategy and resources, which have proved difficult to secure but are vital if newborn screening programmes are to serve infants and their families and not simply be technology led. The United Kingdom health technology assessment programme had the foresight to commission systematic reviews in this field in the early 1990s 7 8 and originally gave high priority to evaluating newborn screening for medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. The subsequent failure to fund this primary research has left many stakeholders disillusioned and frustrated.14 In the United Kingdom many newborn screening laboratories are introducing tandem mass spectrometry to screen for phenylketonuria. It now seems probable that acyl carnitines will be added, but once again, a screening technology looks set to be driven by enthusiasm and opinion rather than evidence.

James V Leonard, professor of paediatric metabolic disease.
Biochemistry, Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH (J.Leonard@ich.ucl.ac.uk)

Carol Dezateux, r
eader in paediatric epidemiology. Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health
Footnotes    CD is a member of the child health subgroup of the National Screening Committee. This editorial is written in a personal capacity and is not intended to represent the views of this committee. CD is lead investigator, and JVL a collaborator, in a national prospective evaluation of newborn screening for medium chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency that has been submitted, but a decision about funding by the Department of Health and the National Screening Committee has been deferred.
1. Report of a work group. Using tandem mass spectrometry for metabolic disease screening among newborns. MMWR 2001; 50: 1-34. 2. Seddon HR, Gray G, Pollitt RJ, Iitia A, Green A. Population screening for the common G985 mutation causing medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency with Eu-labeled oligonucleotides and the DELFIA system
. Clin Chem 1997; 43: 436-442[Abstract/Full Text]. 3. Iafolla AK, Thompson RJ, Roe CR. Medium-chain-acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency: clinical course in 120 affected children. J Pediatrics 1994; 124: 409-414[Medline]. 4. Pollitt RJ, Leonard JV. Prospective surveillance study of medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in the UK. Arch Dis Child 1998; 79: 116-119[Abstract/Full Text]. 5. Dixon MA, Leonard JV. Intercurrent illness in inborn errors of intermediary metabolism. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 1387-1391[Abstract]. 6. Wilson CJ, Champion MP, Collins JE, Clayton PT, Leonard JV. Outcome of medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency after diagnosis. Arch Dis Child 1999; 80: 459-462[Abstract/Full Text]. 7. Pollitt RJ, Green A, McCabe ERB, Booth A, Cooper NJ, Leonard JV, et al. Neonatal screening for inborn errors of metabolism: cost, yield and outcome. Health Technology Assessment 1997;1. 8. Seymour CA, Chalmers RA, Addison GM, Bain MD, Cockburn F, Littlejohns P, et al. Neonatal screening for inborn errors of metabolism: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 1997;1. 9. Andresen BS, Dobrowolski SF, O'Reilly L, Muenzer J, McCandless SE, Frazier DM, et al. Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) mutations identified by MS/MS-based prospective screening of newborns differ from those observed in patients with clinical symptoms: identification and characterization of a new, prevalent mutation that results in mild MCAD deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68: 1408-1418[Medline]. 10. Carpenter K, Wiley V, Sim KG, Heath D, Wilcken B. Evaluation of newborn screening for medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in 275 000 babies. Arch Dis Child 2001; 85: F105-F109[Abstract/Full Text]. 11. Clayton PT, Doig M, Ghafari S, Meaney C, Taylor C, Leonard JV, et al. Screening for medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency using electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry. Arch Dis Child 1998; 79: 109-115[Abstract/Full Text]. 12. Pourfarzam M, Morris A, Appleton M, Craft AW, Bartlett K. Neonatal screening for MCAD deficiency: support from a retospective study. Lancet 2001; 358: 1063-1064[Medline]. 13. Dezateux C. Evaluating newborn screening programmes based on dried blood spots: future challenges. Br Med Bull 1998; 54: 877-890[Abstract]. 14. Tanner S, Sharrard M, Cleary M, Walter J, Wraith E, Lee P, et al. Screening for medium chain acyl-VoA dehydrogenase deficiency has still not been evaluated. BMJ 2001; 322: 112[Full Text

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7328/4
******************************

Study finds there's a critical time for learning
all languages, including sign language

Neuroscientists examining the brain activity of people who learned to speak American Sign Language (ASL) at different times in their lives have found the first evidence that there is a critical period for acquiring a non-verbal language, just as there is for spoken languages.Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the researchers discovered patterns of brain activity in bilingual people who learned ASL before puberty differed from those who learned it after puberty. The findings are reported in this month’s issue of the journal Nature Neuroscience. They indicate there are regions in the brain’s right hemisphere that are activated when children who learned ASL before puberty are reading sign language. The brains of children who learned ASL after puberty show significantly less right hemisphere activity when they are doing the same activity. There is widespread acceptance among neuroscientists that there is a critical period for first language acquisition, and that children who are not exposed to any language before puberty, or perhaps sooner, are unable to fully acquire and use the principles of language. There also is evidence of similar critical periods for acquiring a second language. “We know that late learners of ASL, while they are very fluent, never will be fully fluent like native, or early, learners of ASL,” said David Corina, a University of Washington associate professor of psychology and a co-author of the study. Corina is fluent in ASL.“One aspect of ASL that is difficult for late learners is verb signs of motion. You see some subtle errors in their use of these verbs, just as you might detect subtle grammatical differences when listening to bilingual users of a spoken language when they are not using their native tongue.”Other members of the research team are Aaron Newman, a University of Oregon doctoral student; Helen Neville, University of Oregon psychology professor; Daphne Bavelier, assistant professor of brain and cognitive sciences at the University of Rochester, and Peter Jezzard, a physicist at John Radcliffe Hospital in England.The new study builds on earlier work by this research team showing that right hemisphere activity, along with activation in the left hemisphere, is necessary for processing ASL. The left hemisphere activity has long been associated with the processing of spoken languages.“One area of the brain that is the signature, or specific, to signers if they learned ASL as a native signer, is the right angular gyrus,” Corina said. It is located at the juncture of the temporal and parietal lobes. Activation of the left angular gyrus has been associated with reading English and other spoken languages for many years. The new study shows consistent activation of the right angular gyrus among native signers and some, but not consistent, activation of that brain region among late signers.The study involved 27 bilingual subjects. Sixteen were hearing persons born to deaf parents. They learned ASL and English from birth as native languages. The remaining 11 were the late learners who had English as their native language and learned ASL after puberty, in early adulthood. All of the subjects watched a screen while their brains were imaged using fMRI and were asked to read written English sentences and meaningless strings of consonants. They also were shown and asked to read ASL sentences and meaningless gestures that were similar to real ASL signs.“This work is important because we want to understand the neural systems underlying language,” said Corina. “We want to know if they are malleable or fixed and the degree to which they may vary in different languages. We now know there is activation in the right hemisphere when native signers view ASL, and to see that this is dependent on early exposure suggests there are specific times when neural systems for language may be particularly sensitive to change.”He added that the research has implications for early education of all children because it stressed the need for early language exposure at critical times in development. And now, it is equally important in education for the deaf to ensure linguistic competency in ASL.

Contact: Joel Schwarz
joels@u.washington.edu
206-543-2580
University of Washington

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2002-01/uow-sft010202.php
******************************

District evaluates full inclusion


Officials cite progress in special education, but some parents question affects on general education.

By Gary Moskowitz BURBANK -- The school board recently got a crash course in its own special education program as leaders spelled out current tactics designed to meet the needs of Burbank children with learning disabilities.

A meeting that lasted more than three hours just scratched the surface of special education, educators said. The district's program serves 1,619 students with 270 employees and a budget of more than $14 million in federal, state and district funds.

The district, which has about 15,000 students, will spend almost $2 million of its general fund on special education this year. Considering characteristics like autism, mental retardation and impairments of hearing, vision and speech, program director Sandy Gaynan told the board special education should be the last resort for children, and that it must be proved that regular classroom intervention has been unsuccessful.

"Is the child going to benefit from this? That is what we have to establish with every student," Gaynan said.

Gaynan said 13 students are participating in full inclusion -- the placement of special education students into general education classrooms -- and performance has improved among many of Burbank's special education students.

For parents like Pam Reynolds, full inclusion has made a difference for her 9-year-old son, Jake, who is autistic.

"It can be too stressful for some kids and not the best idea, but it is extremely helpful for kids who can benefit from the social interaction," Reynolds said.

But parents like Nancy Pierce question the effects of full inclusion on the rest of the general education class.

"What safeguards are in place for the average classroom kid, and if you are a kindergarten student with an autistic child in the room, how is their education going to be altered?" Pierce asked. "It helps the handicapped kids in later years, because they have had socialization, which is important, but at what cost to the other students in the room?"

Pierce's concerns are somewhat assuaged by the fact that her 10-year-old son, Matthew, has shared a class with an included special-education student for two years and enjoys helping the student without being asked to do so.

"I usually help him, because I feel like it, and I respect him like any other normal kid. It doesn't bother me or distract me," said Pierce's son, Matthew. "It can be difficult, but when you put effort into it it's worthwhile."

Reynolds maintains the more parents and educators communicate about what strategies are successful and what goals are for the students, the more successful programs like full inclusion will be.

http://www.latimes.com/tcn/burbank/news/la-bl0007213jan02.story?coll=la%2Dtcn%2Dburbank%2Dnews

******************************

Autism Awakening, Autism FIrst Steps Newsletter, or any staff do not endorse any individuals, groups or programs.  References regarding programs, meetings, resources, research, opinions, treatment, etc., should not be interpreted as an indication of endorsement.  They are provided for informational purposes only. This is an attempt to keep the nation advised to all diagnostic, treatment, therapy, educational,
options available as well as legislative autism updates and more.


To View Newsletter Policies they are located at the Newsletter Website:
Direct Link::   Autism First Steps Newsletter
  
http://autismawakeninginia.bizland.com/autismfirststepsnewsletter/


To have friends, Family, or professionals join:
1.  they can go to the above link
2. They can go to the Newsletter Group page located at:
Direct Link:
: Yahoo! Groups : AutismFirstStepsAutismNewsletter    
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AutismFirstStepsAutismNewsletter
3  Send a e-mail to AutismAwakening@aol.com and ask to be subscribed to the free online daily newsletter


Visit one of the largest websites Commited to bringing you the latest in news, options, and techniques, and more on Autism located at:
Direct Link:: Autism Awakening 4 Kids

www.AutismAwakening.com

To Submit a story, alert, readers post, or advertisement please e-mail AutismAwakening@aol.com

To be removed reply to this e-mail and requested to be removed from the list.


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AutismFirstStepsAutismNewsletter-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

 

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.