Up to 1 in 20 of Clinical Trials May Be Fraudulent in England

xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> Up to 1 in 20 of Clinical Trials May Be Fraudulent in England

http://www.mercola.com/2002/jan/30/clinical_trials.htm

 

FREE Weekly Health Newsletter

Your Email Address:

Read Past Issues

Issue 294

January 30, 2002

Hepatitis Vaccine

Frequent Meals

Cholesterol Lowering Drugs

Doctors Choose Expensive Drugs

Turkish Student Regains Health

1 in 20 Clinical Trials Fraudulent

Anthrax Shots May Cause Birth Defects

Surgeon General Announcement Moves Closer

Depression After Unintended Pregnancy Linked to Abortion

Facts About Fluoridation

Vitamin B12: Are You Getting It?

FDA Closes Vaccine Plant

Lack of Vitamin C

Herbal Therapy

Site Search

Free Newsletter

Read this first

Home Page

New Patients

Nutrition Help

 

Up to 1 in 20 of Clinical Trials May Be Fraudulent in England

At least 1% -- and possibly as many as 5% -- of drug trials are compromised by fraudulent data, a British pharmaceutical fraud investigator said on January 15.

Dr. Frank Wells, director of Medico Legal Investigations Ltd., urged countries to set up new disciplinary bodies to ensure doctors found guilty of research fraud are struck off the medical register.

"The incidence of clinical research fraud is difficult to assess but my own estimate is that it is at least 1% and possibly much higher," he told the Society of Biomedical Research in London.

"If we estimate that there are about 3,000 sponsored clinical research projects taking place within the UK at any one time, this means that at least 30 will include investigators who are generating false data," he added.

Wells, who has investigated cases of suspected fraud for the past 10 years, said some doctors become clinical investigators out of greed, vanity, arrogance, boredom and the pressure to publish scientific papers.

Examples of fraud included a surgeon who claimed to have assessed a patient 6 months after he had died and a doctor who claimed to be assessing blood flow in the leg of a patient that had been amputated. Another doctor had forged 191 patient signatures and other data in 21 studies.

Wells told the meeting on fraud and misconduct in biomedical research that in Britain, doctors face the deterrent of being reported to the General Medical Council's disciplinary body, which can strike doctors off the medical register for serious professional misconduct.

But similar sanctions do not yet exist in many other countries, he added. In the United States, the maximum penalty under Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rules is being barred from using federal funds for research for 3 years.

In France, silence is generally the golden rule on fraud, though it is hoped action will eventually be taken at EU level.

In Germany, rules about misconduct in science were only introduced a couple of years ago, while in Italy and Spain there are no anti-fraud measures worth reporting, Wells said.

American pharmaceutical consultant Arthur Horowitz said complaints filed with the FDA against investigators had increased from 11 in 1992 to 118 in 2000. Thirty-five percent of complaints involved protocol violations and 24% falsification of data.

Another area of concern is the huge expansion of clinical trials in Eastern Europe, Africa and South America, where ethical review boards are often inexperienced, Wells noted.

He urged disciplinary standards to ensure employees know that fraud will be treated seriously.

Reuters London, January 15, 2001


DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT:

This is clearly a factor that has to be considered when evaluating any study. I seek to expose as many of these as I can, especially if they involve widely used drugs and are published in major journals. Last year I brought to light the outright fraud and deception that was used to promote Celebrex, an anti-inflammatory, and was published in the largest medical journal in the world, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

If you have not read Dr. O'Shea's excellent review of The Doors of Perceptions, Why Americans Will Believe Almost Anything, I encourage you to do so.

The article reviews not only the outright fraud that occurs, but the even more subtle spins that the media will put on news items to have you believe their points.

Television is one of the major medias in which they do this. I grieve for the upcoming generation who are being brainwashed to believe that there is a pill solution for every medical problem they develop.

The solution is to teach your children to avoid television. I also hope this newsletter will grow to be a major force to counterbalance the fraud and deception that is only making the drug companies wealthier and most of us less healthier.

Examples of fraud in the vaccine industry and food irradiation are also provided below.

Related Articles:

Shoot First and Ask Questions Later

The Dangers of Irradiation Facilities

The Birth of the Vaccination Fraud


Return to Table of Contents #294

 

Home Page

Health Articles

Nutrition Help

Newsletter   

©Copyright 1997-2002 by Joseph M. Mercola, DO. All Rights Reserved. This content may be copied in full, with copyright; contact; creation; and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.


Disclaimer - Newsletters are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola. They are not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and they are not intended as medical advice. They are intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional.

 

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.