http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/audiovideo/programmes/panorama/newsid_1795000/1795534.stm
Wakefield stands by MMR claims
Controversial doctor Andrew Wakefield is
unrepentant about his conviction that the MMR vaccine may cause autism in some
children.
Panorama investigates Dr Wakefield's
claims in the face of criticism that it is "bad science".
Dr Wakefield first went public about his
research in 1998. Parents' confidence in MMR was severely dented and uptake of
the vaccine began to fall.
"My concerns are that one more case of
this is too many and that we put children at no more risk if we dissociate
those vaccines into three but we may be averting the possibility of this
problem," he said.
|
When you're taking on something like the establishment... then
you are inevitably going to come up against this kind of issue
|
|
Dr Andrew Wakefield |
From the moment he first voiced concerns over
MMR, Andrew Wakefield has faced intense criticism from the Department of Health
and the medical establishment. Reports from two expert committees have insisted
the MMR vaccine is safe.
The pressure on Dr Wakefield to produce the
evidence has been intense. But it seems to have made him even more determined
to carry on.
"When you're taking on something like
the establishment on the issue of the safety of a vaccine that has been hailed
as being extremely safe, then you are inevitably going to come up against this
kind of issue," he said.
Safety tests
In January 2000 Dr Wakefield published a new
paper that questioned whether the MMR vaccine had ever been properly tested for
safety.
|
Dr Miller: MMR vaccine not linked to autism |
He claimed the tests were too short to pick
up long-term problems like autism. This highly controversial paper created
another media storm and more confusion about MMR.
Before the study had even been published, the
Department of Health went on the offensive. They launched a concerted attack on
Wakefield's credibility.
Dr Elizabeth Miller spoke at a government
press conference in January 2001. "There are no grounds for suspecting
that MMR vaccine causes autism," she said.
Family decision
Dr Wakefield's concerns about MMR have had a
direct impact on his family. He and his wife, also a doctor, had to decide
whether their own children should be given the triple jab.
Dr Wakefield's wife, Carmel, told Panorama
that their first two children were given the vaccine.
"But then as Andy's work was unfolding
and the potential link to MMR and problems began to unfold, then we had to
reappraise our policy on vaccinating our own children, so our second two
children have not had MMR vaccination," she said.
In March 2001, Dr Wakefield went to
Washington to give evidence before a Congressional committee investigating the
potential link between MMR and autism.
|
There is no evidence that the onset of autistic symptoms is
more likely shortly after MMR vaccine than at any other time
|
|
Dr Elizabeth Miller |
Dr Miller, the British government's
representative, was in the audience to listen to Wakefield's new evidence. She
came to present her own new evidence to refute his claims.
"There is no evidence that the onset of
autistic symptoms is more likely shortly after MMR vaccine than at any other
time," she said.
"Indeed new evidence which is shortly to
appear from my colleagues and myself in a vaccine journal is that there is no
evidence that MMR vaccine increases the likelihood of autism at any time after
vaccination."
Having spoken so publicly about his concerns
about MMR there is growing pressure on Andrew Wakefield to produce some proof.
Panorama reporter Sarah Barclay separates fact from fiction in the war on words
in this important part of public health policy.
Watch 'MMR: Every Parents Choice' at
2215GMT on Sunday on BBC One or via a live stream on this site.
Have
your say on MMR by joining our live debate at 2300GMT on 3 February 2002.
To quiz the experts and discuss the issues
email us:
You can watch the debate here straight after
the programme on Sunday. Digital satellite TV viewers can take part by pressing
the red button on your handset.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.