http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/22/business/22DRUG.html
February 22, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
The company said yesterday that its chief executive, Samuel D. Waksal,
returned $486,000 that he gained from stock sales that might have violated a
rule on trading by insiders.
ImClone's application to sell Erbitux was turned down by the Food and Drug
Administration in December after the company had predicted the drug would be
readily approved and after Bristol-Myers Squibb (news/quote)
had agreed to pay $2 billion for marketing rights. That has prompted
shareholder lawsuits and government investigations into whether the company
misled shareholders.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee sent letters yesterday to Pharmacia
(news/quote),
Merck (news/quote),
Johnson & Johnson (news/quote),
Eli Lilly, Amgen (news/quote),
Chiron and Abbott Laboratories (news/quote).
The committee said it had learned from ImClone that those companies had been in
discussions with ImClone about deals for Erbitux. It wants to know whether the
companies found any problems with the drug.
The documents, including audits and investigations related to ImClone, are
due by Thursday.
As for Dr. Waksal's trades, the company said that on Oct. 25, Dr. Waksal
withdrew 51,532 shares from an exchange fund, a kind of mutual fund that allows
executives to invest with their stock rather than cash. Four days later, Dr.
Waksal sold those shares to Bristol-Myers. But in those four days, ImClone's
stock price rose, increasing the value of those shares by $471,000.
A rule made in the 1930's to discourage insider
trading requires executives to disgorge any profits from buying and selling
company shares within a six-month period. A spokesman said that it was unclear
whether Dr. Waksal violated the rule because it is not legally certain whether
redeeming his shares from the fund constituted buying them. Still, Dr. Waksal
has written a check to the company for the profits from that transaction and
from some smaller ones. The spokesman said Dr. Waksal took the action after a
review by his lawyer.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.