http://www.ipav.org/vappnews.html#cdc
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
click below:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
"After 36 years, we've come
full circle in our efforts to finally eliminate the last remnants of polio in
the U.S.," says John Salamone, president, Informed Parents Against VAPP
(IPAV) and father of a 9-year old who contracted the disease in 1991.
"The recommendations provide a clear message (to all immunization
providers) about the risk of vaccine-associated polio from OPV and the
necessity of an all-IPV schedule. Physicians and parents need not wait until
January 2000 to use an all-IPV schedule." The CDC's Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices' (ACIP) new recommendations state that children should
receive the injectable, inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) for all four doses of
the polio vaccine regimen. As a transition to phase-out OPV, ACIP allows for
OPV use in a sequential vaccination series only under special circumstances
and only until January 2001, when only an all-IPV schedule will be
recommended. "Now, it's up to key medical
groups to encourage physicians and other immunization providers to implement
the new all-IPV schedule," says Salamone. "Ultimately, the
immunization provider can avoid the risk that the last case of polio in the
U.S. will be one of their patients by switching to an all-IPV schedule
now." Currently, four cases of VAPP that
may have occurred in 1998 are under review by the CDC. For the past 20 years,
a reported 8 to 10 cases of VAPP annually have been reported from OPV
administration. IPAV contends that more VAPP cases may have actually
occurred, but were likely misdiagnosed. The safer injectable polio vaccine
(IPV) contains killed virus that cannot transmit polio. In 1997, the CDC issued its set of
recommendations for the mixed IPV/OPV schedule with all-OPV and all-IPV
schedules as acceptable options. According to the CDC, the mixed schedule was
intended to reduce, not eliminate, future VAPP cases. However, more VAPP
cases ensued despite the new CDC recommendations. Now, the CDC has taken the final
step by recommending an all-IPV schedule. Polio is a devastating virus that
attacks the nervous system. It reached epidemic proportions in the United
States during the 1950s, but "wild" cases have been virtually
eradicated by effective vaccination. Infants in the United States should
receive four doses of injectible polio vaccine, beginning at two months of
age and ending at four-to-six years of age. As long as polio exists in the
world, vaccination is essential in ensuring that "wild-polio" does
not re-emerge in the United States. IPAV enthusiastically supports the
all-IPV recommendation, and strongly urges parents to ask their physicians
for the all-injectable polio vaccine schedule to completely avoid the rare
but real risk of vaccine-caused polio. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
The new AAP position recommends that
all children receive the injectable, inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) for
their first two doses of the four-dose polio vaccine regimen. According to
the AAP, the 3rd and 4th doses can be either IPV or the "live-virus"
oral polio vaccine (OPV). The use of an all-OPV schedule, once an acceptable
option, is to be reserved only for use in special circumstances. For the past
19 years, about 8 to 10 cases of VAPP have been documented each year in the
U.S. as a direct result of the oral polio vaccine. Many believe that more may
have actually occurred, but were likely misdiagnosed. The equally effective
injectible polio vaccine (IPV) contains killed virus, cannot transmit polio. In 1996, the U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued the first set of recommendations
for the mixed IPV/OPV schedule, while previous AAP guidelines did not
indicate a schedule recommendation. According to the CDC, the mixed schedule
is intended to reduce, not eliminate, future VAPP cases. In its new
recommendations, the AAP noted that an all-IPV schedule will be recommended
by the year 2001. "We hope the Academy's decision
will mean that physicians will begin to increase their use of the inactivated
polio vaccine and even choose the all-IPV option to completely avoid the risk
of VAPP," says John B. Salamone, president, Informed Parents Against
VAPP. "Studies have shown that when given a choice of polio vaccines,
parents usually opt for the safer, injectible vaccine once they are made
aware of the rare but real risk of vaccine-associated polio caused by the
oral vaccine." "While AAP's new recommendation
is reassuring, we believe that only an all injectible polio vaccine schedule
will eliminate polio once and for all in the United States," says
Salamone, whose son contracted VAPP from the oral vaccine in 1990. "Even
after the CDC implemented its recommendations in 1997, four new VAPP cases
have been confirmed, with others pending. We urge the Academy and other
policy makers to move quickly to end the use of oral polio vaccine in the
U.S. entirely within the next year." Polio is a devastating virus that
attacks the nervous system. It reached epidemic proportions in the United
States during the 1950s, but "wild" cases have been virtually
eradicated by effective vaccination. Infants in the United States should
receive four doses of polio vaccine, beginning at two months of age and
ending at four-to-six years of age. As long as polio exists in the world,
vaccination is essential in ensuring that "wild-polio" does not
re-emerge in the United States. IPAV supports the AAP and CDC
recommendations, but strongly urges parents to ask for the all-injectible
polio vaccine option to completely avoid the rare but real risk of
vaccine-caused polio. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Oral Polio Vaccine Out; Shots to
be Standard
The Advisory Committee for
Immunization Practices (ACIP), which advises the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention on vaccine policy, voted 6 to 4 in favor of a vaccine schedule
that eliminates the oral vaccine except in special circumstances. The vote is
expected to be finalized today. Oral vaccine, which has been used
since the mid-1960s, contains live, weakened virus. It confers immunity, but
it has been the sole cause of paralytic polio -- eight to 10 cases a year --
in the USA since 1979. That happens because ''the virus has
the capacity to revert back to wild type,'' making it virulent, says Paul
Offit, chief of infectious diseases at Children's Hospital in Philadelphia
and chairman of the ACIP polio vaccine working group. The injected vaccine is as effective
as the oral vaccine, but it contains no live virus and cannot cause polio,
Offit says. Pediatrician Michael Marcy, a member
of the American Academy of Pediatrics' committee on infectious diseases, says
the decision to eliminate oral vaccine has been expected and it's likely
''the academy will agree to follow the ACIP recommendation.'' Doctors have been concerned about
adding another injection to the routine shots infants already get. But even though the chance of a
child getting vaccine-associated polio is very small, Marcy says, ''each of
us always has in the back of our mind a little concern.'' Based on an ACIP vote two years ago,
the CDC changed the polio vaccination schedule in January 1997 to recommend
injected vaccine for the first two doses, given at 2 and 4 months of age,
followed by oral vaccine at 12-18 months and again between 4 and 6 years of
age. But the committee at the time said
an all-oral or all-injectable vaccine schedule was an acceptable alternative.
Many doctors, slow to change a
30-year practice of using oral polio vaccine, did not convert to the new
schedule. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
End Oral Polio Vaccine, Panel Says
Salk developed his vaccine in 1954,
but, despite his pioneering work, his product was largely supplanted within a
decade by a vaccine developed by Dr. Albert Sabin that was less expensive,
more effective and could be taken orally. The subsequent global dominance by
the oral vaccine provoked an extremely bitter and often nasty public feud
between the two scientists that lasted for years until Sabin's death in 1993.
The panel's decision Thursday
effectively makes Salk the posthumous winner in the longtime rivalry,
although only in the United States, where polio epidemics are no longer
regarded as a probability. The move to return to the Salk
vaccine was prompted by growing concerns in recent years over a small number
of polio cases apparently caused by the oral vaccine. CDC Expected to Follow
Panel's Advice The panel's recommendation is not
binding but is expected to be accepted by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, which drafts immunization policy guidelines for the public health
community. The Department of Health and Human
Services will make the final decision but typically follows the CDC's advice.
Most of today's young adults
received the oral version of the vaccine--often on a cube of sugar--while
their parents got the shots, from the mid-1950s to the early '60s, after
Salk's discovery. There are numerous advantages to the
Sabin vaccine, particularly overseas, but its use in the United States has
resulted in eight to 10 cases annually of children who contract the disease. The risk is extremely rare, about
one case for every 2.4 million doses, according to the CDC. The World Health Organization
declared in 1994 that naturally occurring "wild" polio had been
eradicated from the Western Hemisphere. The last documented case was in 1991
in Peru. "The oral polio vaccine was
vital to the elimination of the wild polio virus in the United States and
other parts of the world and continues to be important. . . . However, oral
polio vaccine, in rare instances, does cause paralytic polio. We couldn't
ignore that," said CDC spokeswoman Barbara Reynolds. The virus that causes poliomyelitis,
or infantile paralysis, attacks the central nervous system and can produce
paralysis and death by asphyxiation. There are no effective drugs to treat
it. Patients whose respiratory cells have been destroyed usually require a
respirator to control breathing and keep them alive. To become immune to polio, children
must have four doses of the vaccine before the age of 6. Most parents have little choice over
the issue of whether to vaccinate their children against polio, since all 50
states require it for entry into public schools. If accepted, the panel's
recommendation would be effective Jan. 1, although pediatricians are free to
administer the shots earlier. The panel suggested that the oral vaccine still
be used if children are planning to travel to areas of the world where polio
outbreaks still occur. The oral vaccine, which has been
widely used since 1965, is made from a live but weakened form of the virus
and is believed to provide better immunity against the disease because it
results in intestinal immunity, which is necessary in polio epidemic
settings. The Salk vaccine is produced from a
killed virus and provides bloodstream immunity, less effective during
epidemics. But it is incapable of causing the disease. "We've come full circle in our
efforts to finally eliminate the last remnants of polio in the U.S.,"
said John Salamone of Oakton, Va., father of a 9-year-old boy who contracted
polio in 1991 after receiving the oral vaccine. "Now it's up to key
medical groups to encourage physicians and other immunization providers to
implement the new . . . schedule." Salamone founded a parents' group to
fight for a return to the injectable vaccine. Until his death at age 86, Sabin
steadfastly maintained that his vaccine could not cause polio. "What is
the proof?" he asked in a 1983 interview with The Times. "One out
of 5 million vaccinations with live vaccine doesn't mean the vaccine causes
it. There are other kinds of paralysis that simulate polio that are not
polio." Salk responded in a separate
interview. "Cases exist [of polio caused by live virus vaccine] which
have been documented, and everyone -- all but one man -- believes the
evidence. It is . . . simply remarkable that he casts doubt about it." Salk died in 1995 at age 80. In 1996, the CDC altered its
recommended polio vaccine schedule to two injections of the killed virus,
followed by two doses of the oral product, with the idea that the first two
doses would decrease the risk of contracting the disease from the oral doses.
The change effectively reduced the
number of cases in the United States to four in 1997 and only one last year,
the agency said. And it hopes that eliminating the oral vaccine entirely will
end all cases of vaccine-caused polio. The new recommendations "will
guarantee a polio-free America in the next millennium, and we are proud to be
a part of this historic movement toward disease eradication," said David
J. Williams, president and chief operating officer of Pasteur Merieux
Connaught of Swiftwater, Pa., which manufactures the injectable vaccine.
'Virtual Eradication' of Wild Virus The company said that it would work
with government and medical organizations to implement the new policy. Doug Petkus, a spokesman for Wyeth
Lederle of Radnor, Pa., which makes the oral product, said that the company
is proud its product contributed to the "virtual eradication of wild
polio virus" and pledged to continue to work on vaccines that would
benefit children. The Sabin product was appealing
because it was easier to administer to children. It also was very effective
in provoking immunity in people who do not directly receive it but who have
contact with people who do--a phenomenon known as "herd" immunity. This is
especially valuable overseas in developing countries, where immunization of
children is not as widespread as it is here, and also during epidemics. And
the oral vaccine does not require sterile equipment, such as needles, or
trained health personnel to administer it.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.