http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,44831,00.html
|
Parents Call For Reforms |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For innocent parents charged or accused of child abuse,
a system that "errs on the side of the child" provides cold
comfort. But for social workers witnessing unspeakable crimes of
abuse and neglect against children, the risk of overzealousness
seems minor compared with the urgency to rescue kids in danger. But activists insist reform will help both sides,
protecting families while clearing caseloads so the states can devote more
resources to families and children truly in trouble. Their proposed reforms
include: A clear definition of abuse and neglect.
Reformers want a legal standard of abuse and serious neglect that
is less open to personal interpretation. Such laws and regulations
would prohibit the removal of a child from home for any reasons other
than physical or sexual abuse, or serious neglect. Restructuring child services' financial
operations. Reformers want to dismantle systems that require
families to work only with doctors, therapists and counselors who either hold
contracts with or are employed by the state. Such reforms would also mandate
the abolition of financial bonuses for states that adopt out larger numbers of
foster children. An end to secrecy. Parents'
groups want the right to see all the evidence against them, including
anything that would be used in court. Activists also want laws that would
require caseworkers, doctors and therapists to videotape or audio-record
their interviews and examinations of children; and for parents to have the
right to have an attorney, clergy member, or other objective observer present
during these evaluations. Due process. Parents want the same legal
rights and protections as criminals accused of crimes. That includes the
right to face their accusers, to have an attorney, to be tried by a jury of
their peers and the right to appeal. Due process would also prohibit child
services' from entering private homes without a warrant, taking custody
of children without a court order. Many of these laws are on the books,
but parents and lawyers insist they are not enforced. Some also want child abuse cases moved out of family court
and into the criminal justice system, where police would determine the
veracity of child abuse charges. Others argue parents could be even worse off
under this system, where they would be at the mercy of potentially untrained
police officers or vengeful juries. A new plea bargain system. Parents
want to overhaul or scrap the current system that usually requires
them to "admit"abuse and agree to a state-mandated service
plan before they get their children back. True abusers should not get their
kids back, the parents insist. And innocent parents should not have their own
children used against them as bargaining chips. Independent review. Finally, activists
want some measure of oversight or citizen complaint boards to monitor child
protective services, or the adoption of laws that would impose penalties
on caseworkers who remove children without just cause. |
||||||||||||||||||||
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.