|
Wednesday, 6 February, 2002, 15:03 GMT
MMR:
Mothers divided

Stanley has had the MMR vaccination
As
the debate over the measles, mumps and rubella vaccination rages on, two
mothers on either side of the argument explain their choices to the BBC.
Shani Hinton is mother to Stanley, who is
almost two, and twelve week old Jacob.
Shani decided to allow Stanley to have the
MMR immunisation after doing a lot of reading and talking to doctors .
|

Shani Hinton says she will think again when baby Jacob needs
the jab
|
Shani told the BBC: "We decided that
the risk of either measles, mumps or rubella was greater than the risk of
autism.
"All the evidence that we read pointed
in that direction and there was nothing to show that there was a real
connection with autism.
"So we decided that was the way
forward for us."
She added: "There will always be
people who are convinced their children are autistic because of the MMR.
"And there will always be people, like
me, who feel that the evidence is the other way and there is no link."
Jacob is set to have his MMR immunisation
in a year's time, but Shani says she will look again at all the evidence
about the jab's safety before going ahead.
Concerns
Natalie Passey is mum to 18-month-old
Louise and Charlie, eight weeks.
|

Baby Charlie's mum Natalie says she is unconvinced of MMR's
safety
|
She is adamant that neither will have the
MMR jab
"With the autism, the constant ear
infections, high temperatures, the rashes - I'm just not prepared to put my
son at risk."
She called for information which would
confirm the jab's safety for parents.
She wants a guarantee there is no danger.
"Some documentation, or reliable
medical information from GP surgeries or the government to prove that there
is no link whatsoever."
|