http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Drug-Advertising.html
February 13, 2002
|
|
|
|
TV viewers are right if they are feeling barraged by commercials for the
likes of Vioxx, Prilosec, Claritin and Viagra: Drug company advertising aimed
at ordinary people instead of doctors tripled in the United States between 1996
and 2000 to nearly $2.5 billion a year.
Advertisements targeting consumers account for 15 percent of U.S. spending
to promote medications, up from almost 9 percent in 1996, a study found.
Spending that targets doctors -- including visits from sales
representatives, free samples and medical journal ads -- slipped from 91
percent to 84 percent during the same period, according to researchers at
Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
They analyzed data on media advertising and sales of individual drugs, examining
trends since 1996, the year before the Food and Drug Administration issued
rules for television ads on prescription drugs.
The study appears in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.
Critics such as Dr. Sidney Wolfe of Public Citizen Health Research Group
argue that drug ads aimed at ordinary people encourage use of expensive,
sometimes unnecessary medicines, appeal to patients' emotions, undermine the
doctor-patient relationship and rarely tell patients about the drugs' success
rate, alternative treatments and other key information.
The pharmaceutical industry argues the ads inform and empower consumers,
prompt many to see their doctor about an untreated health problem and nudge
others to take their prescription drugs more faithfully.
The researchers found the biggest jump has been in TV commercials, with a
seven-fold increase in spending -- from $220 million to $1.6 billion -- between
1996 and 2000.
Sixty percent of the print and broadcast ads were for just 20 medications,
including the arthritis drugs Vioxx and Celebrex, the ulcer drug Prilosec,
Viagra for impotence and the allergy drugs Claritin, Allegra and Zyrtec.
Total spending on prescription drug promotion grew about 70 percent, from
about $9.2 billion in 1996 to $15.7 billion in 2000, the same rate of growth as
drug sales had during that period.
^------
On the Net:
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.