The Death of Medicine: No Cure, No Vaccine, No Treatment
xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml"
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
The Death of Medicine: No Cure, No Vaccine, No Treatment
THE DEATH OF MEDICINE
No Cure, No Vaccine, No Treatment
By Nicholas Regush
There is no way to be nice about this. There is no point in raising false
hopes. There is no treatment or vaccine in sight. There is no miracle
breakthrough on the horizon.
Medicine, as we know it, is dying. It is entering a terminal phase.
What began as an acute illness reached the chronic stage about a decade ago and
progression towards death has been remarkably swift and well beyond anything
one could have predicted.
The disease is caused by conflict of interest, tainted research, greed for big
bucks, pretentious doctors and scientists, lying, cheating, invasion by the
morally bankrupt marketing automatons of the drug industry, derelict
politicians and federal and state regulators - all seasoned with huge doses of
self-importance and foul odor.
As a journalist, it has become very plain to see how little anything the
medical Establishment does these days can be trusted or taken at face value.
Press conferences, journal articles, symposia - all are geared to spike and
obfuscate the truth, to hide red flags from the public and to bulk up the
shares of investors in the companies that are promoting the science and the
researchers.
Like a disease that festers to the point of no return, medicine has reached
that line and stepped over it.
Item: A well-known expert in prescription drugs tells me that it is no longer
possible for him to fight the system. His wife has made it clear to him that
she is losing out on the good times and wealth that "all the other
wives" are enjoying. So he has thrown in the towel and now expects to get
the perks that all the other guys are getting: free trips to conferences,
invitations to give speeches at luncheons, research funding without having to
beg for it, and so on. He is sad about this - but hey what can you do?
Item: Dr. David Healy, a well-known Welsh expert in psychiatric drugs is
approached by an agency representing an antidepressant manufacturer. He is
invited to speak at a symposium. The deal is that he will write a paper for a
supplement based on his talk. The agency tells him that their ghostwriters will
actually produce the paper, based on his previous work. He says no. He writes
his own paper but the agency also wants the ghostwritten paper to appear in the
supplement because it had some "commercially important points." The
agency finds another "expert" who will lend his name to its
"paper."
Item: There is more noise being made these days about who pays for research
published in journals. But what about research published in books? And who
actually reviews these "books?"
Do we have any idea of how many medical books are actually financed by
industry? No, we don't because most people don't tell who their backers are.
This has been a non-issue.
Item: Whose agendas are fueling medical research? A case in point: Should
Cancer researcher John Mendelsohn, who is president of the University of Texas
MD Anderson Center in Houston, sit on the corporate board of ImClone? This is a
biotech company that has been developing a new anticancer drug. Forget for a
moment that ImClone is being investigated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (Did the company mislead investors about the cancer drug?) Does it
make make any sense for John Mendelsohn to have ties to ImClone? Can we trust
that MD Anderson is looking out for its patients first?
Item: A scientist with ties to research at the National Cancer Institute
managed to convince an editor of an obscure cancer journal to publish a paper
that had been previously rejected. The journal's editor, a buddy, had also been
involved in the research that was featured in the paper.
You're right. This is all very depressing. It goes on and on. Any enterprising
reporter could put a list together of thousands of examples like these of how
both the giants and the pipsqueaks of modern medicine have sold out and can no
longer be trusted.
I feel bad for the physicians who do care about their patients- and yes, there
are still many of those around. Day in and day out, they turn up at their
community or hospital offices and meet with people who need help. And they mend
wounds and take the time to do careful histories. They usually are not the type
who go to big conferences and give speeches.
The problem, unfortunately, is that the foot soldiers rely on the information
from the monster pack that has ripped away the heart of medicine and now they
will also watch it die, as they have known it.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
Sandy's Scandals Column
Past and current Scandals
- columns by Sandy Gottstein (aka Mintz)*
* ►March 20, 2010
- Taking
the Final Step: Implementation of a Mandatory Flu Shot Program Within a
Healthcare System - Fifth Decennial International Conference
on Healthcare-Associated Infections (abstract) - "Exemption from
vaccination was allowed for egg allergy, history of either
Guillian-Barré or a post-flu shot anaphylaxis. A formal
exemption process began as a written appeal to an internal review board
which determined exemption. For the non-exempt, the choice to not be
vaccinated resulted in termination. Rehire is conditional, based on the
intent to comply with influenza vaccination in the future. ...Over
99.99% of approximately 3800 employees received a seasonal flu shot. No
serious side effects occurred among those receiving vaccine. Of those
employees who applied for exemption but were denied, 4 chose to
terminate employement; however, one of these, a physician, chose
retirement rather than immunization. Consequences for unvaccinated,
non-employees were not explored this initial year."
* ►March 19, 2010
- Autism,
Vaccines, Thimerosal: Further Study Needed - Age of Autism -
"No study has looked at the possible effect of the synergistic toxicity
of aluminum and thimerosal, which are never supposed to be used in
combination (according to the Manufacturer Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)
for thimerosal ) and are indeed combined in many shots (according to
the Vaccine Excipient Summary from the
CDC). And no controlled study, not one, exists on the effect of
low dose ethyl mercury toxicity in humans (a statement made by study
author Anders Hviid himself below on p.1765)."
* ►March 18, 2010
- FDA
to Ease Way for Multidrug Regimens (MRK,AZN) - SmarTrend News Watch
via COMTEX via Trading Markets - "At least two pharmaceutical consortia
are poised to take advantage of the forthcoming policy: a group of 10
drug companies and several nonprofit organizations convened by the Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation to develop medicines to fight
tuberculosis; and pharmaceutical giants Merck & Co. (NYSE: MRK |
Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating) and AstraZeneca PLC (NYSE: AZN |
Quote | Chart | News | PowerRating), which are jointly testing two
anticancer agents."