http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-AIDS-Heart.html
February 28, 2002
|
|
|
|
SEATTLE (AP) -- New research raises the possibility that lifesaving AIDS
drugs may also increase the risk of heart trouble, though experts say the
medicines' benefits still far outweigh any hazard.
Researchers are at odds over whether the drug combinations are bad for the
heart. Conflicting studies of the question were released in Seattle at the
Ninth Annual Retrovirus Conference, which concluded Thursday.
The drug combinations have been in widespread use for about six years and
have prevented thousands of AIDS deaths. However, doctors are still learning
about possible long-term effects.
Some of these side effects quickly became apparent, including odd
rearrangements of body fat and a variety of metabolic abnormalities, such as
changes in cholesterol levels. But it was unclear whether these would
eventually lead to extra heart trouble.
Some of the strongest evidence of a possible heart risk comes from a large
study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It suggests
that the overall risk is low, because most patients are relatively young.
Nevertheless, those on the drugs have about five times the usual risk of heart
attacks.
But another study of U.S. veterans found no such increase.
``It's not possible to say which is right,'' said Dr. Harold Jaffe, the
CDC's acting AIDS chief. ``The question is important and will get much more
attention in the coming years.''
People with AIDS often take three or more medicines, including a category of
drugs called protease inhibitors that are a key ingredient of the pill
combinations.
Dr. Scott Holmberg and others from the CDC followed the health of 5,676
HIV-infected people in eight cities from 1993 to 2001. Half took protease
inhibitors.
Heart attacks were rare. Nevertheless, there were 13 among those getting
protease inhibitors, compared with just two among people who did not take the
medicines.
Protease inhibitors influence the body's ability to regulate sugar and fat
levels in the blood, and there is some evidence of an overall increase in heart
attacks among people being treated.
``For all those reasons, we think we are seeing an early but still relative
small problem,'' Holmberg said.
However, a study led by Dr. Samuel Bozette of the University of California
at San Diego questioned whether patients have actually had more heart problems
since the introduction of the drug combinations with protease inhibitors.
He examined records of 36,766 HIV-infected veterans over the same period as
the CDC's review. There were about 1,800 hospital admissions for heart disease
and strokes.
He concluded that if anything, there was a slight decline in heart disease
and strokes following the introduction of protease inhibitors.
``Drug use is going up tremendously. Survival is going up tremendously. But
this complication does not seem to be changing,'' said Bozette, whose study was
partially financed by drug makers.
A smaller analysis by doctors from the Kaiser Permanente health plan in
Oakland, Calif., also found no increase in heart trouble among HIV-infected
patients after the introduction of protease inhibitors. However, they found
heart disease was almost twice as common among people with HIV than in those
without, and they concluded that the virus itself, rather the treatment, might
be the explanation.
Holmberg said doctors should be especially careful to make sure that people
on AIDS treatments lower their risk of heart disease by quitting smoking,
keeping their blood pressure under control and taking cholesterol-lowering
drugs, if necessary.
``As people with HIV live longer, we will see more of these diseases of
aging, so we need to worry more about just keeping people alive,'' he said.
^------
EDITOR'S NOTE: Medical Editor Daniel Q. Haney is a special correspondent for
The Associated Press.
^------
On the Net:
Conference site:
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.