|
|
Periodicals Home | Search |
User Pref |
Help |
| J Peds Home |
Table of Contents |
All Issues | Order |
About this Journal |
<< Issue |
>> Issue |
![]() |
December 2002 • Volume 141 • Number 6
Association of Medical School Pediatric Department
Chairs, Inc.
Pediatrics and
the legislature: Suggestions for lobbying your legislature
Sections |
|
Four recent changes will make it increasingly more important, yet difficult, for
any group or person to effectively lobby their local legislature. First, state
governments throughout the country are feeling reverberations from the recent
economic slowdown. According to a recent national conference, state legislatures
report that revenues in 43 states in the early months of fiscal year 2002 were
below forecast. At least 36 states have reduced spending levels or are
considering doing so, and 24 states have dipped into budgetary reserves or are
considering doing so. Second, change at the national level is clearly
influencing the way business is being conducted in state legislatures, as more
powers to control resources are returned to the states. Third, the 1994
elections have brought more political balance to state legislatures throughout
the country. Before the 1994 election, Democrats maintained a clear edge in the
state legislatures, controlling 64 chambers to the Republicans' 31. Today,
Republicans control 50 chambers to the Democrats' 46. Instead of the 8 states
controlled in 1994, Republicans now hold the majority in both chambers in 19
states. (National Conference of State Legislatures) Fourth, and equally
significant, nearly half of all state legislative leaders are new to their
positions.
The resulting changes in political composition will dramatically alter the way
in which persons and groups lobby their state legislature. This becomes
progressively important for those who advocate children's services, because most
of those advocates use volunteers and professionals to get their message to
state legislators. Experienced legislators know the various groups that lobby
them, and with the large number of new legislators, the professional lobbyists
on the ground at the state capitol will have even more of the upper hand.
It is obviously clear that, with the changing political landscape, those
advocating for children's services will have an increasingly difficult time. A
grass-roots group of volunteers can be a potent force when they are adequately
focused and dedicated to getting their message out. Clearly, these groups have
their work cut out for them compared with the seasoned, highly paid lobbyists
employed by business, education, labor, and other more organized groups.
The challenges faced by those advocating children's services was clearly made
evident when a study commissioned in 1994 by the State Legislative Leaders
Foundation, with the support of the Annie E. Casey and Ford Foundations, found
that state legislative leaders are not familiar with how children are faring in
their districts or in their states and that they are not well informed about the
policies and programs that work, or the evidence of their impact on children
(State Legislative Leaders; Keys to Effective Legislation for Children and
Families). The benefit of this situation, however, is that legislators clearly
need accurate information regarding children's issues, thereby making the
advocates a resource and source for information, ideas, and proposals.
One specific obstacle for child advocacy lobbyists may be their lack of intimate
knowledge and understanding of how the legislative process works, particularly
behind-the-scenes. It is not enough to understand the mechanics of how
legislatures work. To effectively lobby your state legislature you must have an
appreciation of the intangibles that exist: the personalities of the
legislators, the importance of timing, an understanding of the legislature's
inner circle, and a willingness to compromise. The necessity for compromise is
not generally understood, but it is at the heart of the legislative process.
Legislation is rarely enacted without change from the form in which it started.
A peculiarity found in academics and particularly in academic medical centers is
the need for unanimous consensus on an issue. This does not occur during the
legislative process. Seldom do you have a unanimous vote, either in committee or
in floor action, on any legislation, particularly on an issue that involves
money or departs from the status quo. Success is often measured by a 50% plus 1
vote. The final result may not be perfect but it works.
Another intangible is the legislature's inner circle and how the system works.
Those most successful at the State Capitol are those who understand these
issues. In the legislature today, it is unrealistic for legislators to become
experts on every subject that comes before them, including the details of
billion dollar budgets that are now common in most states. The most effective
legislators are those who concentrate on becoming experts in one or two specific
areas or subjects. In other subjects, these legislators may rely upon members
whose knowledge and judgment they respect and upon nonmembers with expertise,
including legislative staff and lobbyists. At first glance, this reality may be
seen as a hurdle. However, further analysis makes the legislators' “ignorance”
an opportunity for lobbyists. Because legislators are routinely looking for
authorities related to various issues, child advocacy lobbyists can fulfill that
need.
One institution that has been able to build a long and trusted relationship with
the state legislature is the University of Oklahoma Department of Pediatrics.
This relationship began several years ago with a direct infusion of public
funding to support the Department of Pediatrics when Oklahoma moved its Medicaid
population to managed Medicaid. During the 2000 and 2001 legislative session,
that success continued with a 220% increase in funding for the Child Study
Center, as well as the funding of several new positions by the Legislature.
Although the College of Medicine (COM) had to compromise on certain priorities
to gain this support, in the long run the COM and the Department of Pediatrics
will be stronger with the newfound support.
There is no best way to approach legislators and no single method that
guarantees success. However, the University of Oklahoma has found great success
by using the lobbying methods and tactics presented below.
The University of Oklahoma has also learned some valuable tools in working with
legislators on an individual basis. You must establish yourself as a competent,
accurate source of objective and timely information. You must also realize that
legislators are overwhelmed with information about every conceivable subject.
Don't bury them with information but rather provide succinct (preferably
one-page) summaries that emphasize your major points. Furthermore, as you are
actively lobbying and talking with legislators, avoid using specialized jargon
that may alienate or lead to misinterpretation of facts.
A specific tactic that you can use to further foster effective communication
with your legislators is to write letters annually to them indicating the number
of children served from their respective districts. You may also sponsor
informal gatherings with key legislators whereby faculty present specific cases
of children served throughout the state. You can further highlight how state
support has contributed to the success of some of your specific programs. At the
University of Oklahoma, we emphasized how state support had led to the
university recruiting more than one dozen endowed faculty members to serve
Oklahoma's children.
Another particular tactic that you might use includes identifying areas where
services for children are lacking in your state, and then describing how a
specific appropriation would improve those services. In Oklahoma, this included
hiring a new endocrinologist to educate and serve the large Native American
population.
Additional general guidelines that will help you reach your goals include being
very cautious not to overpromise or develop expectations that are impossible to
fulfill. Your credibility is important, and if you mislead a legislator one
time, you will no longer be trusted. Along those lines, always provide those
sponsoring your legislation all the information for which they ask. To further
anchor trust between you and the legislators, communicate to them the
anticipated opposition; this will allow them to be fully prepared. It will also
prevent embarrassing or frustrating situations for the legislators.
After the passage of a new law, bill, or statute, always be appreciative of a
legislative act, both to the individual member and to their constituents!
Express gratitude constantly. It is the poor lobbyist who only receives and does
not give back to the legislator. Also, do not avoid members of the minority
party. Their vote may make the difference between winning and losing, and they
may not be in the minority forever.
Legislators have extremely difficult jobs, and contrary to the public's negative
perception, being a legislator is an honorable endeavor. To stand out from the
crowd, anyone going to the State Capitol to lobby an issue must be thoroughly
versed in the intricacies of the legislative process of their state. Although
using the tips offered in this article is no guarantee of success, using the
tactics will dramatically increase your odds.
| Publishing and Reprint Information | TOP |
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.