|
| Mercury concentrations and
metabolism in infants receiving vaccines containing thiomersal: a
descriptive study |
Michael E Pichichero, Elsa Cernichiari, Joseph Lopreiato, John
Treanor
Departments of Microbiology/Immunology (Prof M E
Pichichero MD), Environmental Medicine (E Cernichiari), and
Medicine (J Treanor MD), University of Rochester, Rochester,
New York, NY, USA; and National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
(J Lopreiato MD)
Correspondence to: Dr Michael E Pichichero, Department of
Microbiology/Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601
Elmwood Avenue, Box 672, Rochester, NY 14642, USA (e-mail:michael_pichichero@urmc.rochester.edu)
Summary
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Background Thiomersal is a preservative containing small amounts
of ethylmercury that is used in routine vaccines for infants and
children. The effect of vaccines containing thiomersal on
concentrations of mercury in infants' blood has not been extensively
assessed, and the metabolism of ethylmercury in infants is unknown. We
aimed to measure concentrations of mercury in blood, urine, and stools
of infants who received such vaccines.
Methods 40 full-term infants aged 6 months and younger were
given vaccines that contained thiomersal (diptheria-tetanus-acellular
pertussis vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, and in some children
Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine). 21 control infants
received thiomersal-free vaccines. We obtained samples of blood,
urine, and stools 3-28 days after vaccination. Total mercury (organic
and inorganic) in the samples was measured by cold vapour atomic
absorption.
Findings Mean mercury doses in infants exposed to thiomersal
were 45·6 µg (range 37·5-62·5) for 2-month-olds and 111·3 µg (range
87·5-175·0) for 6-month-olds. Blood mercury in thiomersal-exposed
2-month-olds ranged from less than 3·75 to 20·55 nmol/L (parts per
billion); in 6-month-olds all values were lower than 7·50 nmol/L. Only
one of 15 blood samples from controls contained quantifiable mercury.
Concentrations of mercury were low in urine after vaccination but were
high in stools of thiomersal-exposed 2-month-olds (mean 82 ng/g dry
weight) and in 6-month-olds (mean 58 ng/g dry weight). Estimated blood
half-life of ethylmercury was 7 days (95% CI 4-10 days).
Interpretation Administration of vaccines containing
thiomersal does not seem to raise blood concentrations of mercury
above safe values in infants. Ethylmercury seems to be eliminated from
blood rapidly via the stools after parenteral administration of
thiomersal in vaccines.
Lancet 2002; 360: 1737-41
See Commentary

Thiomersal is a preservative used in vaccines routinely administered to
infants and children. Its antimicrobial activity is due to small
amounts of ethylmercury; the usual dose of paediatric vaccine contains
12·5-25 µg of mercury.1-3 When vaccines containing
thiomersal are administered in the recommended doses, allergic
reactions have been rarely noted, but no other harmful effects have
been reported.4 Massive overdoses from inappropriate use of
products containing thiomersal have resulted in toxic effects.5-9
Mercury occurs in three forms: the metallic element, inorganic
salts, and organic compounds (eg, methylmercury, ethylmercury, and
phenylmercury). The toxicity of mercury is complex and dependent on
the form of mercury, route of entry, dosage, and age at exposure.
Mercury is present in the environment in inorganic and organic forms,
and everyone is exposed to small amounts.10,11 The main
route of environmental exposure to organic mercury is consumption of
predatory fish, especially shark and swordfish. A 6-ounce can of tuna
contains 2-127 µg (average 17 µg) of mercury.12 Freshwater
fish (eg, walleye, pike, muskie, and bass) can also contain high
concentrations of mercury.
Most of the toxic effects of organic mercury compounds take place
in the central nervous system, although the kidneys and immune system
can also be affected.10,11,13 Organic mercury readily
crosses the blood-brain barrier, and fetuses are more sensitive to
mercury exposure than are children or adults. Data about potential
differences in toxicity between ethylmercury and methylmercury are
few. Both are associated with neurotoxicity in high doses; in-utero
poisoning with methylmercury causes problems that are similar to
cerebral palsy. Findings about the effect of low-dose methylmercury
exposure on neurodevelopment in infants are contradictory.14,15
In-utero exposure could be related to subtle neurodevelopmental
effects (eg, on attention, language, and memory) that can be detected
by sophisticated neuropsychometric tests-- although the conclusion is
confounded by concomitant ingestion of polychlorinated biphenyls in
the patients investigated.14,15
No toxic effects of low-dose exposure to thiomersal in children
have been reported.3 The effect of the small amounts of
mercury contained in vaccines on concentrations of mercury in infants'
blood has not been extensively assessed, and the metabolism of
ethylmercury in infants is unknown. We aimed to assess concentrations
of mercury in full-term infants after administration of routine
vaccinations according to the schedule used in the USA, and to obtain
additional information about the presence of mercury at other body
sites including urine and stool. Samples of hair and breast milk were
also obtained from some mothers of infants participating in the study.

We studied two groups of full-term infants who differed in their
history of exposure to vaccines containing thiomersal. Infants in the
exposure group were recruited at the Elmwood Pediatric Group, a large
paediatric practice in Rochester, NY, USA, where vaccinations with
thiomersal preservative were routinely given. 20 infants aged 2 months
and 20 aged 6 months were studied at this practice to obtain
information about the range of total thiomersal exposures likely to
take place during infancy. The control group consisted of 21 infants
who did not receive vaccines containing thiomersal and were recruited
from the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD. All the infants
were recruited during routine well-child examination and vaccination
visits by the investigators (between November, 1999 and October,
2000). Written informed consent was obtained from parents for all
procedures.
Vaccines containing thiomersal that were given to infants in the
exposure group included Tripedia (diphtheria-tetanus-acellular
pertussis vaccine; Aventis Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA; 0·01% thiomersal,
25 µg mercury per dose) Engerix (hepatitis B vaccine; GlaxoSmithKline,
Rixensart, Belgium; 0·005% thiomersal, 12·5 µg mercury per dose), and
in some children HibTITER (Haemophilus influenzae type b
conjugate vaccine, Wyeth-Lederle, Pearl River, NY, USA; 0·01%
thiomersal, 25 µg mercury per dose). Vaccines administered to the
control group included Infanix (diptheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis
vaccine; GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium), Recombivax HB
(hepatitis B vaccine; Merck, West Point, PA, USA), and ActHIB (Haemophilus
influenzae b conjugate vaccine, Aventis Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA,
USA).
We obtained vaccination histories--including type of vaccine,
manufacturer, lot number, and dates of administration--from the
medical records. In the exposure group, we obtained samples of
heparinised whole blood, stool, and urine, during a visit 3-28 days
after vaccination. Blood and urine were kept at 4°C, and stools were
frozen until assessment. Urine was sampled by use of a urine bag at
the clinic, and stool was taken from a diaper (nappy) provided by the
parent. Whole blood and urine were obtained from the control children.
At both sites, we obtained at least 50 hairs from the mother by
cutting at the base near the scalp in the occipital area, to assess
potential transplacental exposure of infants to mercury. Additionally,
several samples of breastmilk or formula were obtained from mothers of
infants at Elmwood Pediatric Group, as well as stool samples from a
few infants who were not exposed to thiomersal.
We measured total mercury in all samples (and inorganic mercury in
stool samples) by cold vapour atomic absorption as previously
described.16,17 The limit of reliable quantitation in this
assay ranged between 7·50 nmol/L and 2·50 nmol/L, dependant on sample
volume.
| Population pharmacokinetic
calculations |
To estimate the half-life of thiomersal mercury in the blood, we
developed a prediction model for the expected concentrations of
mercury in blood for half-lives of mercury ranging from 1 day to 45
days, on the basis of bodyweight of the infant, the doses of
thiomersal administered, and the times between the individual doses of
thiomersal and when the blood was obtained. To do these calculations,
we assumed that 5% of the mercury dose was distributed to blood,7
that blood volume represented about 8% of the infant's bodyweight, and
that elimination of mercury from blood followed a single-compartment
model with first-order kinetics. For each possible half-life between 1
and 45 days, we then calculated the difference between the predicted
and actual recorded concentrations in blood for each infant. Only
measurements within the range of reliable quantitation were used in
these calculations.
The best estimate of the blood half-life of mercury was judged to
be the hypothetical half-life, which resulted in the smallest
difference between predicted and observed values. We constructed a 95%
CI based on a likelihood ratio for this estimate with the assumption
that errors from the decay model were independent, additive, and
normally distributed. The 95% confidence limits were the points where
the curve crossed the minimum sum of squares multiplied by 1+ 2(1)/(n-1)
where n is the number of data points and
2(1) is the upper
5% point of the 2
distribution on one degree of freedom.
Because this was a descriptive study we did no formal calculations for
sample size. Student's t test and Fisher's exact test were used
to compare results for the exposure and control group, with p  0·05
judged to be significant.
| Role of the funding source
|
The sponsors of the study approved the study design but had no other
involvement in the in study design, data collection, data analysis,
data interpretation, or writing of the report.

61 infants were enrolled in this study (table). Among infants aged 2
months in the exposure group, samples were taken from eight within 7
days of vaccination, from five between 8 and 14 days after
vaccination, and from seven between 15 and 21 days after vaccination.
Among 6-month-old infants in the exposure group, samples were taken
from seven between 4 and 7 days after vaccination, from eight between
8 and 14 days after vaccination, and from five between 15 and 27 days
after vaccination. Samples were obtained from infants in the control
group at regularly scheduled visits at 2 or 6 months of age. All
children remained healthy throughout the study and during 24-36 months
of follow-up.
| |
Infants aged 2 months |
|
Infants aged 6 months |
| |
Thiomersal-exposed (n=20) |
Controls (n=11) |
Thiomersal-exposed (n=20) |
Controls (n=10) |
| Bodyweight (kg) |
| Mean (range) |
5·3 (4·0-6·4) |
NR |
8·1 (6·7-10·6) |
NR |
| Total mercury exposure (µg)* |
| Mean (range) |
45·6 (37·5-62·5) |
0 |
111·3 (87·5-175·0) |
0 |
| Blood mercury (nmol/L) |
| Number of samples tested |
17 |
8 |
16 |
7 |
| Number with mercury in range |
12 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
| Mean (SD)† |
8·20 (4·85) |
4·90 |
5·15 (1·20) |
.. |
| Median (IQR)† |
6·15 (4·60-10·85) |
4·90 |
5·30 (4·55-6·10) |
.. |
| Range† |
4·50-20·55 |
.. |
2·85-6·90 |
.. |
| Urinary mercury (nmol/L) |
| Number of samples tested |
12 |
6 |
15 |
8 |
| Number with mercury in range |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
| Mean (SD)† |
3·8‡ |
.. |
5·75 (1·05) |
.. |
| Median (range)† |
3·8‡ |
.. |
6·2 (4·55-6·45) |
.. |
| Stool mercury (ng/g dry weight) |
| Number of samples tested |
12 |
NT |
10 |
NT |
| Number with mercury in range |
12 |
.. |
10 |
.. |
| Mean (SD)† |
81·8 (40·3) |
.. |
58·3 (21·2) |
.. |
| Median (IQR)† |
83·5 (47·0-121·3) |
.. |
58·0 (42·0-68·5) |
.. |
| Range† |
23·0-141·0 |
.. |
29·0-102·0 |
.. |
| NR=Not recorded. NT=not tested. *Via vaccination.
†All calculations done only with samples within range of accurate
quantitation. ‡Only one value so SD and range are not applicable. |
| Concentrations of mercury in blood, urine, and
stool of infants who received vaccines containing thiomersal and
those who did not |
Sufficient volumes of blood ( 1
mL) for the measurement of mercury by the atomic absorption technique
were obtained from 17 infants aged 2 months and 16 aged 6 months in
the exposure group. Mercury concentrations were below the range of
reliable quantitation in five of 17 blood samples from 2-month-olds,
and seven of 16 blood samples from 6-month olds (p=0·48). The mean
concentration of blood mercury in samples with quantifiable mercury
was higher in 2-month-olds than in 6-month olds (difference 3·05 nmol/L,
95% CI 0·03-1·24, p=0·06), but was low in both these groups (table).
Sufficient blood volumes for measurement of mercury were obtained from
15 infants in the control group, including eight aged 2 months and
seven aged 6 months. Blood mercury was below the level of reliable
quantitation in seven of the eight samples from the 2-month-olds and
in all seven samples from 6-month-olds. The only detectable value from
the control group was 4·65 nmol/L.
Overall, mercury concentrations were below the range of
quantitation in 12 of 33 samples from thiomersal-exposed infants and
in 14 of 15 unexposed infants (p=0·04). The highest level of blood
mercury detected in any infant in this study was 20·55 nmol/L, which
was measured 5 days after vaccination in a 2-month-old infant weighing
5·3 kg, who had received vaccines (Tripedia and Engerix B) containing
a total dose of 37·5 µg mercury. The relation between time between
vaccination and sampling and the concentration of mercury in the blood
in the exposed group is shown in figure 1. Although mercury
concentrations were uniformly low, the highest levels were recorded
soon after vaccination.
|
|
Figure 1: Blood mercury concentrations in infants
aged 2 months (diamonds) and 6 months (squares) by time of
sampling
Filled symbols represent measured values and open symbols
represent samples at the limit of quantitation, either 7·50 nmol/L,
3·75 nmol/L, or 2·5 nmol/L, dependent on sample volume. |
Mercury was undetectable in most of the urine samples from the
infants in this study. Only one of 12 urine samples from 2-month-olds,
and three of 15 from 6-month-olds in the exposure group, and none of
the 14 samples from the controls, contained detectable mercury. The
highest concentration of urinary mercury detected was 6·45 nmol/L, in
a 6-month old infant in the exposure group (table).
Stool samples were collected from infants in the exposure group.
All of the stool samples from infants who received thiomersal-containing
vaccines had detectable mercury, with concentrations in stools from
2-month-old infants slightly higher than those in 6-month-olds
(p=0·098, table). As expected, most of the mercury in stools was
inorganic. Stool samples were not obtained from control infants;
therefore, to determine whether dietary intake could contribute to the
mercury content of stools, we also obtained samples from nine infants
at Elmwood Pediatric Group who were age-matched with the infants in
the exposure group and were not exposed to vaccines containing
thiomersal. The mean mercury concentration in the stools of these
infants was 22 ng/g dry weight (SD 16), which was significantly lower
(p=0·002) than the mean of the samples collected from thiomersal-exposed
infants.
Amounts of mercury measured in maternal hair are shown in figure 2.
The mean concentration of hair mercury in mothers of the exposure
group was 0·45 µg/g hair, whereas the mean amount in mothers of the
control infants was 0·32 µg/g (p=0·22). Eight mothers of infants in
the 6-month-old cohort provided breast milk samples. Concentrations of
mercury in these samples were low (mean=0·30 µg/g, range 0·24-0·42
µg/g).
|
|
Figure 2: Mercury concentrations in hair from mothers
of infants
Bar represents mean concentration of mercury in maternal hair.
|
We estimated the half-life of mercury in blood after vaccination to
be 7 days, since this result gave the smallest difference between the
expected and recorded (measured) concentration (figure 3). The 95% CI
around this estimate was 4-10 days. The half-life estimate was very
similar when only measurements in 2-month-olds (7 days, 95% CI 4-11)
or 6-month-olds (5 days, 3-9) were included, suggesting that the rate
of elimination of thiomersal mercury from blood was similar in both
age-groups.
|
|
Figure 3: Estimated blood half-life of mercury in
infants who were exposed to thiomersal
Lines represent sum of square of differences between observed
concentrations of blood mercury (nmol/L) and those predicted for
every individual infant on the basis of bodyweight and time of
sampling, with a series of hypothetical half-lives shown on x
axis. Arrow shows point with lowest value for squared difference,
indicating best estimate for serum half-life. |
We have shown that very low concentrations of blood mercury can be
detected in infants aged 2-6 months who have been given vaccines
containing thiomersal. However, no children had a concentration of
blood mercury exceeding 29 nmol/L (parts per billion), which is the
concentration thought to be safe in cord blood;18 this
value was set at ten times below the lower 95% CI limit of the minimal
cord blood concentration associated with an increase in the prevalence
of abnormal scores on cognitive function tests in children. Blood
mercury concentrations indicate concentrations in organs well.18
Although our study was not designed as a formal assessment of the
pharmacokinetics of mercury, we did obtain samples of blood at various
time points after exposure. Assessment of these samples suggested that
the blood half-life of ethylmercury in infants might differ from the
40-50 day half-life of methylmercury (range 20-70 days) in adults and
breastfeeding infants.10,19 The concentrations of blood
mercury 2-3 weeks after vaccination noted in our study were not
consistent with such a long half-life, but suggested a half-life of
less than 10 days. However, this conclusion is based on several
assumptions and a very simple model, and does not take into account
the fact that at least some of the mercury detected in the blood of
the infants in this study is likely to have been derived from
exposures other than vaccination. Because of the short period between
vaccination and sampling, the findings of Strajich and colleagues20
could be consistent with either a 6-day or 40-day half-life, but are
otherwise consistent with the assumptions made in our model. Because
we expected a 45-day half-life on the basis of methylmercury
pharmacokinetics, the first blood samples were obtained 3 days after
vaccination. Blood samples taken in the first 72 hours after
vaccination, stool samples obtained every 24 h, and samples from
premature newborn babies (weighing 2000
g) given a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine would have helped us to
reach stronger conclusions. Thus, additional studies of the
pharmacology of thiomersal in infants are underway.
At the times tested after vaccination, mercury excretion in urine
in our study population was low. By contrast, concentrations of
mercury in stool were high, and combined with the finding that stool
mercury concentrations in infants who were not exposed to thiomersal
were significantly lower is consistent with the hypothesis that the
gastrointestinal tract represents a possible mode of elimination of
thiomersal mercury in infants.
Overall, the results of this study show that amounts of mercury in
the blood of infants receiving vaccines formulated with thiomersal are
well below concentrations potentially associated with toxic effects.
Coupled with 60 years of experience with administration of thiomersal-containing
vaccines, we conclude that the thiomersal in routine vaccines poses
very little risk to full-term infants, but that thiomersal-containing
vaccines should not be administered at birth to very low birthweight
premature infants. Decisions about the elimination of thiomersal from
these vaccines must balance the potential benefit of reduced exposure
to mercury against the risks of decreased vaccine coverage because of
higher costs, the risk of sepsis in recipients because of bacterial
contamination of preservative-free formulations, and the risks of
exposure to alternative preservatives that might replace thiomersal.
| Conflict of interest
statement |
M Pichichero and J Treanor contributed to the study conception and
design; obtained, assessed, and interpreted data; drafted and revised
the manuscript; and provided statistical expertise and supervision. E
Cernichiari contributed to analysis and interpretation of data,
revision of the manuscript, and technical support. J Lopreiato
contributed to revision of the manuscript, and obtained data.
We thank Tom Clarkson for advice about the interpretation of mercury
assays, David Oakes for statistical advice, Doreen Francis for
recruiting participants and obtaining samples, and Margaret Langdon
and Nicole Zur for technical assistance. The investigation was funded
by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, under
contract 1 AF-45248.

1 Clements CJ, Ball LK, Ball R, Pratt D. Thiomersal in vaccines. Lancet
2000; 355: 1279-79. [Text]
2 American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Infectious Diseases,
and Committee on Environmental Health. Thimerosal in vaccines--An
interim report to clinicians. Pediatrics 1999; 104: 570-74. [PubMed]
3 Ball LK, Ball R, Pratt, RD. An assessment of thimerosal use in
childhood vaccines. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 1147-54. [PubMed]
4 Cox NH, Forsyth A. Thimerosal allergy and vaccination reactions.
Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18: 229-33. [PubMed]
5 Axton JH. Six cases of poisoning after a parenteral organic
mercurial compound (merthiolate). Postgrad Med J 1972; 561: 417-21. [PubMed]
6 Fagan DG, Pritchard JS, Clarkson TW, Greenwood MR. Organ mercury
levels in infants with omphaloceles treated with organic mercurial
antiseptic. Arch Dis Child 1977; 52: 962-64. [PubMed]
7 Matheson DS, Clarkson TW, Gelfand EW. Mercury toxicity (acrodynia)
induced by long-term injection of gammaglobulin. J Pediatr
1980; 97: 153-55. [PubMed]
8 Lowell JA, Burgess S, Shenoy S, Curci JA, Peters M, Howard TK.
Mercury poisoning associated with high-dose hepatitis-B immune
globulin administration after liver transplantation for chronic
hepatitis B. Liver Transpl Surg 1996; 2: 475-78. [PubMed]
9 Pfab R, Muckter H, Roider G, Zilker T. Clinical course of severe
poisoning with thimerosal. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1996; 34:
453-60.
10 Clarkson TW. Mercury: major issues in environmental health. Environ
Health Perspect 1992; 100: 31-38. [PubMed]
11 Clarkson TW. The toxicology of mercury. Crit Rev Clin Lab
Sci 1977; 34: 369-403. [PubMed]
12 Yess NJ. US food and Drug Administration survey of methylmercury
in canned tuna. J AOAC Int 1993; 76: 36-38. [PubMed]
13 Shenker BJ, Guo TL, Shapiro IM. Low-level methylmercury exposure
causes human T-cells to undergo apoptosis: evidence of mitochondrial
dysfunction. Environ Res 1998; 77: 149-59. [PubMed]
14 Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, et al. Cognitive deficit in
7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol
Teratol 1997; 6: 417-28. [PubMed]
15 Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C, et al. Effects of prenatal and
postnatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption on
neurodevelopment: outcomes at 66 months of age in the Seychelles child
development study. JAMA 1998; 280: 701-07. [PubMed]
16 Cernichiari E, Toribara TY, Liang L, et al. The biological
monitoring of mercury in the Seychelles study. Neurotoxicology
1995; 16: 613-28. [PubMed]
17 Cernichiari E, Brewer R, Myers GJ, et al. Monitoring
methylmercury during pregnancy: maternal hair predicts fetal brain
exposure. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16: 705-10. [PubMed]
18 Nielsen JB, Andersen O, Grandjean P. Evaluation of mercury in
hair, blood and muscle as biomarkers for methylmercury exposure in
male and female mice. Arch Toxicol 1994; 68: 317-21. [PubMed]
19 National Academy of Sciences. Toxicologic effects of
methylmercury. Washington DC: National Research Council, 2000.
20 Stajich GV, Lopez GP, Harry SW, Sexson WR. Iatrogenic exposure
to mercury after hepatitis B vaccination in preterm infants. J
Pediatr 2000; 136: 679-81. [PubMed]

|
|