Mass
Inoculations Pose Complexities
|
|
Bioterrorism Preparedness Guide
Dirty
bombs, anthrax and smallpox: An informative guide for to
understanding the threat and protecting you and your family.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Find Post
Stories by Topic: |
|
--or-- |
|
Search Story
Archive by Keyword: |
|
Advanced Search |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____From the Post_____
President Reviving Program to Provide Smallpox Vaccine
(The Washington Post, Dec 12, 2002)
Soldiering On After The Smallpox Shot (The Washington
Post, Dec 10, 2002)
Bioterrorism Defense Plan Takes Shape (The Washington
Post, Dec 5, 2002)
Smallpox Vaccine Reactions Jolt Experts (The
Washington Post, Dec 5, 2002)
Officials Asked to Speed Smallpox Plan (The
Washington Post, Nov 28, 2002)
Bush Leans To Limited Smallpox Vaccination (The
Washington Post, Nov 23, 2002)
Homeland Bill Covers Smallpox Shot Liability (The
Washington Post, Nov 16, 2002)
Military Smallpox Vaccinations Planned (The
Washington Post, Nov 15, 2002)
Bush Considers Smallpox Vaccine for Troops (The
Washington Post, Nov 8, 2002)
FDA Grants License for Smallpox Vaccine (The
Washington Post, Nov 2, 2002)
Panel Alters Advice On Smallpox Shots (The Washington
Post, Oct 17, 2002)
Voluntary Smallpox Vaccination Urged (The Washington
Post, Oct 5, 2002)
|
|
|
|
|
By Guy Gugliotta
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 13, 2002; Page A20
Middle-aged Americans probably remember it as little more than a ho-hum
trip to the family doctor, but the resumption of large-scale smallpox
vaccinations after a 30-year hiatus promises to be anything but simple.
The Bush administration is expected today to set in motion plans to
inoculate 500,000 military personnel and as many as 500,000 health care
workers nationwide -- the front-line defenders in any biological warfare
attack against the United States.
As more vaccine becomes available, federal health officials say the
"Phase I" program will soon expand into a "Phase II" to include 10 million
to12 million additional Americans -- virtually the nation's entire
contingent of police, firefighters and other first responders. The vaccine
would probably be offered to the general population by 2004.
Sixty-two states, cities and territories have been getting ready for
Phase I for months, calling for volunteers, educating them on the vaccine's
dangers and preparing to monitor its effects. Wyoming conducted drills to
determine how long it took to vaccinate 100 people.
"We are extremely pleased and quite impressed with the plans that have
been submitted so far," Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G.
Thompson said yesterday. "It is obvious the state and local health
departments and hospitals have stepped up to the plate under an extremely
tight timetable."
The military plan, unlike the civilian version, is mandatory, according
to a key member of Congress, but in other respects will largely mimic
civilian procedures -- vaccinating first-line medical personnel before
immunizing soldiers in high-risk areas such as Iraq and the Middle East. The
Pentagon did not respond to requests for information on its plan.
Despite administration enthusiasm for the vaccinations, many questions
remain unresolved.
"This is not something that anyone can take lightly," said Diane Sosne, a
registered nurse and leader of the 16,000 health care workers in the
Washington state branch of the Service Employees International Union. "We
want to make sure this doesn't pose more risks than it is supposed to
address."
The smallpox vaccine, used throughout the United States until 1972 and in
the U.S. armed forces until the 1980s, can have extreme side effects. For
every million people vaccinated, as many as 52 will suffer serious illness,
including prolonged fever, and one or two will die.
At the least, people who receive the vaccine -- usually in a series of
pinpricks on the upper arm -- can expect swelling, redness, itching and a
large, lingering scab. A few days of fever or malaise is common.
Such adverse reactions were deemed more than acceptable when smallpox was
a world scourge, but there has not been a reported case anywhere in the
world since 1977.
Doctors warn that the vaccine poses unacceptable risks for babies, people
with a variety of skin conditions and anyone with a weakened immune system.
"In the old days, we didn't have a lot of the medications we have today,
so those patients would die," said Laurene Mascola, who is in charge of the
vaccine program for Los Angeles County, Calif. "Today there are many more
cancer patients living, more people on steroids, and more people living with
HIV."
The Service Employees International Union, the nation's largest health
care workers union with 1.5 million members, criticized the administration
earlier this month for failing to provide compensation for volunteers who
may miss work, become ill or even die from taking the vaccine.
"This is an economic decision as well as a health care decision," said
SEIU President Andrew L. Stern. "Suppose I'm a per diem nurse, and I'm out
for a couple of days or I go to the hospital. That has to come out of my
pocket. This should be a no-fault situation."
On Capitol Hill, Rep. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) questioned whether the
armed forces will adequately screen personnel likely to suffer adverse
reactions:
"It's mandatory, so people will take this vaccine against their will,"
said Shays, a longtime critic of Pentagon vaccine policy. "Since they will
have to comply, it's important to determine who should get it."
Shays said medical workers in the military must not cede control of the
vaccination process to field commanders with little expertise: "The record
of the military in following private-sector procedures is basically
nonexistent," Shays said.
Despite these misgivings, the public climate for the vaccination program
appears to be markedly positive. A Robert Wood Johnson Foundation poll
released Wednesday found 65 percent of respondents are willing to get a
vaccination.
"I thought we'd be having a lot of our people saying this is a bad idea,"
said Wyoming state epidemiologist Karl Musgrave, in charge of vaccinations
in the least populous state. "But more questions came from people who wanted
to do it and were asking for a waiver -- one nurse was on chemo, another was
taking steroids and another had diabetes. No matter what, they want to take
it."
In Wisconsin, Herb Bostrom, the director of the Bureau of Communicable
Diseases, found the same enthusiasm, "even though significant questions
remain" about compensation and medical care. "People in hospitals and public
health recognize they are supposed to do this, and they will," Bostrom said.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gave states and local
governments until Dec. 9 to submit plans for conducting vaccinations both
before and after a smallpox outbreak. The CDC said yesterday that plans it
has examined so far envision inoculating almost 450,000 people.
Musgrave said Wyoming's plan calls for "about 1,000 people" to receive
the vaccine in Phase I, a task he said could probably be completed in a few
hours. He said eight communities practiced vaccinating 100 people this
summer and managed the job "in a couple of hours."
Elsewhere, authorities appeared less inclined to move that quickly:
"We'll start slowly, do one site first and see what happens," said Georges
C. Benjamin, former Maryland secretary of health and mental hygiene, who
said his state expects to vaccinate between 6,000 and 8,000 people during
the initial phase. (Benjamin resigned Sunday to take another position.) He
said Maryland could complete the vaccinations "within a week," but is in no
hurry: "There is no emergency. We're going to look at the experience, and
see if our criteria are too rigid or too loose. There's a learning curve."
In Los Angeles County, Mascola will vaccinate as many as 12,000 people
but is "not interested in doing it until January," when the worst of the flu
season is over.
Staff writer Ceci Connolly contributed to this report.
© 2002 The Washington Post Company
|