Vaccination News Home Page

http://news.bmn.com/magazine/article?pii=S0966842X02024770

 
Research
Tools
Reviews Journal
Collection
News &
Comment
Books &
Labware
Science
Jobs
Web
Links
news.bmn.com Latest
Updates
Today's
News
Magazine Conference
Reporter
Commentary Journal
Scan
Special
Report
My E-mail
Alerts
Section
Search
  My BMN My BMN Exit Exit  
  Send Feedback to BMN Feedback Help System Help  


 

About This Section
BioMedNet Reviews
Is the world’s largest life science reviews database. It includes over 16,000 articles drawn from over 150 life science and biomedical journals.

 
BioMedNet Reviews

 
Access To This Section
As a BioMedNet member you have:

Free full-text access to this article within BioMedNet Reviews for 14 days.

Access to abstracts of all articles in the Reviews database.

You will have a full-text access to all other articles if your institute subscribes. Recommend to your librarian.

 

 
Did you know?
Full-text access to BioMedNet Reviews is available on subscription for your institute or company. More information

 
Email Alerts
You can customize your email alerts from BioMedNet Reviews to keep up to date with your own interests. Sign up here

 


 

 


 
 

BSE – a wolf in sheep's clothing?
Matthew Baylis, Fiona Houston, Rowland R. Kao, Angela R. McLean, Nora Hunter and Mike B. Gravenor
Trends in Microbiology 2002, 10:563-570
journal coverThe entire sheep flock in the UK has been threatened with slaughter if BSE is found in farmed sheep, largely on the grounds that an epidemic of BSE in sheep could be harder to contain than was the case for cattle, and that lamb could present a greater risk to consumers than beef. However, identifying BSE in a sheep is not straightforward, because of its similarities to the related disease, scrapie. Here, we review the likelihood that any UK sheep have BSE, how they might have got it, how a case could be identified and what the Government is doing in terms of surveillance and possible control methods.

 
In September 2001, the UK government published its contingency plan should naturally occurring BSE be found in sheep [1]. The contingency plan considers, as a worst-case scenario, slaughtering the entire national flock, with possible catastrophic impact on the livelihoods of tens of thousands of farmers and others involved directly or indirectly with the sheep meat industry. It would also change the face of the British landscape. By contrast, despite the fact that there were >1300 cases of BSE in UK cattle in 2001 and >100 people have died from variant Creutzfeld–Jacob disease (vCJD), probably following the dietary consumption of the BSE agent [2,3] , the culling policy for cattle has been selective, restricted to BSE-affected animals, their offspring and other cattle exposed to the same source of infection.

The relative economics of cattle versus sheep have probably contributed to the difference in the policies for cattle and sheep BSE but the different nature of the diseases and the absence of precise data on sheep BSE have played an even greater part. Encouragingly, sheep themselves could have an alternative solution encoded in their genes, and the UK government is earnestly pursuing this possibility by instigating a policy of selective breeding for resistance.

Cause for concern

There have been no proven or even putative cases of BSE identified in farmed sheep. To date, all known cases of the disease have been induced under laboratory conditions by the experimental infection of sheep with tissue from infected animals ( Fig. 1). Nevertheless, there are reasonable grounds for believing that up to several thousand farmed sheep could have been infected with BSE and some could even have developed the disease but were overlooked.

The recycling of ruminant tissue into meat and bone meal (MBM) in the 1980s, which was commonly fed to cattle as an ingredient of feed concentrates, is clearly linked to the development of the epidemic of BSE in cattle ( Box 1). Sheep, mostly adult pregnant ewes, are also fed concentrates, and these could also have contained MBM in the 1980s [4]. However, the amount of infectious material consumed by sheep would have been much less than that consumed by cattle. A sheep eats, on average, only 1–2% of the volume of feed concentrate eaten by a bovine [5] and the amount of MBM in sheep concentrate was at most equal to, and probably much less than, that present in the cattle equivalent [6]. Sheep, then, were much less exposed to BSE than were cattle.



 
Go to the Full Article > >


Bullet As a BioMedNet member you have free full-text access to this article within BioMedNet Reviews for 14 days

Bullet You will have full-text access to all articles if your institute subscribes.
Recommend a subscription to your librarian

Bullet There are 15,000 more Review articles in BioMedNet Reviews

Bullet Please send us your feedback on this magazine
 

 
BioMedNet Magazine
18th December 2002 - 14th January 2003
home icon Magazine Home
email icon Email to a Friend
full article icon Full Article
printer icon PDF printer ready version
 

 
Related Links in BioMedNet Reviews
Journal Table of Contents
Table of Contents by email
Related Full Text Articles
Browse Microbiology
Browse Biochemistry
Browse Genetics
Search BioMedNet Reviews


 



 
 


BioMedNet
Home
News &
Comment
My BMN
 
Help System
 
Send Feedback to BMN
 
Information for Advertisers © Elsevier Science Limited 2002

 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.