For free subscriptions, unsubscriptions, questions or
suggestions, email to
“I find medicine is the best of all trades because whether
you do any good or not you still get your money.” (Moliere: “A Physician in
Spite of Himself,” 1664)
The DOCTOR YOURSELF (SM) NEWSLETTER Vol 2, No 3 December 5, 2001 “Free of
charge, free of advertising, and free of the A.M.A.”
Written by Andrew Saul, PhD. of http://www.doctoryourself.com
, a free online library of 300 natural healing articles with nearly 4,000
scientific references.
The flashy-titled “C is for Cancer?” article (New
Scientist, 22 September 2001, p 20) is a good example of sketchy science
carelessly reported. The article would have readers uncritically extend the
questionable findings of a highly artificial, electrical-current-vibrated
quartz crystal test tube study, and conclude that two thousand milligrams of
vitamin C can (somehow) do some sort of mischief to fatty acids and human DNA
in real life.
If two thousand milligrams of vitamin C were harmful, the
entire animal kingdom would be dead. Our nearest primate relatives all eat well
in excess of two thousand milligrams of vitamin C each day. And, pound for
pound, most animals actually manufacture from two to ten thousand milligrams of
vitamin C daily, inside their bodies.
If such generous quantities of vitamin C were harmful, evolution would
have had millions of years to select against it.
As it is, many well designed studies show that large doses
of vitamin C improve both quality and length of life for cancer patients. Supportive megavitamin C therapy also
reduces hair loss and nausea from chemotherapy, enabling oncologists to give
maximum strength treatments.
“C is for Cancer Patients!” would be a more accurate
title. The public should not be discouraged from taking generous quantities of
supplemental vitamin C. Just the
opposite. For vitamin C is not a problem; it is a solution.
References:
Murata, A., Morishige, F. and Yamaguchi, H. (1982)
Prolongation of survival times of terminal cancer patients by administration of
large doses of ascorbate. International Journal of Vitamin and Nutrition
Research Suppl., 23, 1982, p. 103-113. Also in Hanck, A., ed. (1982) Vitamin C:
New Clinical Applications. Bern: Huber, 103-113.
Null, G., Robins, H., Tanenbaum, M., and Jennings, P.
(1997) Vitamin C and the treatment of cancer: abstracts and commentary from the
scientific literature. The Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients. April/May.
Riordan, N. H., et al. (1995) Intravenous ascorbate as a
tumor cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent. Medical Hypotheses, 44(3). p 207-213,
March.
Rivers, J. M. (1987) Safety of high-level vitamin C
injestion. In: Third Conference on Vitamin C. Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences. Vol. 498.
(More in a seemingly endless series)
MYTH: “YOU DO NOT NEED
TO TAKE VITAMIN E SUPPLEMENTS BECAUSE THERE IS
Oh yeah? While I
cheerfully admit that vegetable oil contains natural beneficial cofactors,
count the number of IU’s of vitamin E in it. There are 26 mg of vitamin E in a
CUP of olive oil. (A milligram is close to an IU.)
The amount of E that is preventive of cardiovascular disease
is at least 100
IU, probably 400 IU, possibly as much as 800 IU daily. And a
CUP of olive
oil contains less than 30 IU. http://www.doctoryourself.com/vitamin_e.html
MYTH: “IF YOU TAKE
TOO MUCH VITAMIN E, IT WILL CAUSE PROBLEMS WITH PROLONGED CLOTTING TIME.”
Vitamin E will prolong clotting time, but beneficially.
That’s why it is such a competitor for Coumadin.
http://doctoryourself.com/drugalt.html
“Vitamin E is a potent inhibitor of thrombin that does not
produce a hemorrhagic tendency and therefore is a safe prophylactic against
venous thrombosis.”
(Alton Ochsner, M.D., one of the world’s leading heart
surgeons)
Not true.
Newmark, H. L. (1976) Stability of vitamin B-12 in the
presence of ascorbic acid. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 29:6,
645-649.
MYTH: YOUR BODY CANNOT ABSORB ENOUGH VITAMIN C TO BE
USEFUL AS AN ANTIBIOTIC
Individual needs for vitamin C vary greatly, especially
during illness. A relatively small
amount of C is often sufficient for normal health, whereas tens of thousands of
milligrams may be absorbed during viral or bacterial illness, particularly if
the dosage is frequently divided during the day. When sick, one should take the minimum that gets you well. One can expect very high minimums during
illness. Doses should be measured in grams, not milligrams, up to bowel
tolerance (saturation).
Reference websites:
http://www.vitamincfoundation.org
READERS ASK:
“IS THERE A NATURAL CURE FOR STREP THROAT?”
Strep throat (which is far more frequently “diagnosed” by
pediatricians than
lab tests confirm) is amenable to the vitamin C megadose
protocol of
Cathcart, Klenner and Cameron. I’ve posted their articles at
http://doctoryourself.com/titration.html and
http://doctoryourself.com/klennerpaper.html
It still somewhat mystifies me that their work is not
better known, until I consider the huge dollar value of antibiotic sales. We’re not even talking bib diseases here,
for it is no longer uncommon for a fully-vaccinated child under one year of age
to already have had 10 or more courses of expensive antibiotics. Many adults
fare little better. Antibiotic
overprescription is rampant quackery.
My children were raised (ovolacto) vegetarian, took their
kiddie vitamins, had their kiddie vegetable juices, and simply did not need the
kiddie doctor. We would have taken them
if the need arose, but we first handled occasional illness the natural way.
This includes very sore throats.
Nobody is interested in vitamins. What people want is to
know how to cure disease. This goes for preoccupied doctors as much as for
desperate patients. In 25 years of
lecturing on natural health care, I have almost never had anyone (practitioner
or layperson) come up to me afterwards and say, “tell me more about the
biochemistry of vitamin therapy!”
Rather, the ubiquitous follow up question is, “What vitamins should I
use for (such and such an illness)?”
In righteously answering such a question, the task is to
present the facts of vitamin therapy accurately and rapidly, without losing
sight of the questioner’s specific need.
As Ward Cleaver demonstrated, the Beaver needs unbiased truth in
shortened form, as applies to his specific situation.
It is as hard to provide that in a book as it is in a
conversation.
The fundamental strength behind Dr. Melvyn Werbach’s
Textbook of Nutritional Medicine is that it fully appreciates the immediate
need of the reader. This book is not
about vitamins; it is about diseases treatable with vitamins. Should you ever want to put someone to
sleep, just start lecturing on nutrition with the ever-boring “vitamins A
through E and foods that contain them” approach. I guarantee that heads will be
nodding long before you finish with the B-complex.
Textbook of Nutritional Medicine is that rarity among all
health books: at 750 large pages, it is still remarkably concise. Almost all of it is organized by illness,
not by nutrient. It is not preachy and it never overstates the role of
nutrition. It takes only seconds to look up any one of over 80 diseases that
are known to respond to nutritional therapy. And it is very heavily referenced.
The Textbook is an outgrowth of Dr. Werbach’s 1988
Nutritional Influences on Illness, which was essentially a topic-by-topic
collection of research abstracts. I liked that a lot, and required it as a
textbook when I taught graduate clinical nutrition. The current Textbook is
more complete in every way, and is well worth its $75 hard cover price. It
provides far more direction to the open-minded practitioner or self-care minded
general reader. To have an “alternative” health book written by a medical
doctor (co-authored with a dentist, Dr. Jeffrey Moss) is very valuable to
patients who are struggling upstream to convince their pharmophilic (drug
loving) physicians to at least give vitamin therapy the time of day. There is nothing
quite like pulling out a book like this one to shorten physicians’ “supplements
might hurt you so just eat a good diet” speeches. And even the most
ostrich-like orthodox practitioner can not long resist the call of the literally
thousands of peer-reviewed journal references that Dr Werbach has read, sorted,
and summarized in his book.
So trot out the Textbook next time somebody tries to tell
you that more research is needed before vitamins can be used to treat illness.
There is a real possibility that your doctor will recoil
when s/he is presented with all these references. This reaction, true to human nature, is nevertheless
unscientific. It is embarrassing to
doctors when patients know more about their case than they do. Yet there is no other rational choice. If therapy exists, and is reasonably
well-tested and safe, it is inexcusable to not try it. Doctors know this, but are so uneducated in nutrition
that they are usually not in a position to supervise such therapy. Hence the embarrassment. The Textbook
provides the continuing education they so sorely need.
Obviously, you need to read it first, but not all of
it. It is a reference. Do you read the dictionary cover to cover?
(You don’t have to, because, as comic Steven Wright says, “The zebra did it.”) Just look up the diseases that are closest
to home. You, your family, and your
friends all stand to benefit from the hard work that Dr. Werbach has already
done for you, distilling and sorting hundreds of studies into one lap-friendly
volume.
Dr. Werbach’s objectivity is so carefully maintained that,
to a general reader, his well-balanced approach might seem like fence sitting.
This is perhaps most notable in his cautious discussion of vitamin C against
cancer. I also noticed that, in
considering schizophrenia, the Hoffer-Osmond Adrenochrome Hypothesis was
omitted. My personal opinion is that Dr. Werbach might have more to say in open
support of really high divided doses of niacin (not just niacinamide in
moderation) for anxiety and psychosis. The multiple sclerosis section makes no
mention of the nutritional protocol of Frederick R. Klenner and Roger J.
Williams is not cited in the otherwise very good section on alcoholism. Max Gerson is absent from the chapter on cancer. William J. McCormick is not mentioned in
connection with vitamin C and cerebrovascular disease, and I found no
references to Wilfrid or Evan Shute’s pioneering work with vitamin E and heart
disease. This may be because Dr. Werbach has chosen, perhaps because of
limitations of space, to focus on more recent research. Additionally, I think chromium polynicotinate,
zinc monomethionine, iron fumarate, and so-called colloidal minerals should be
added to the section on “Elemental Mineral Content of Common Mineral Salts”
used as supplements.
Lest I appear to be nit-picking, let me assert that any
book that calmly mentions vitamin E doses of up to 3,200 I.U., and maximum
daily treatment dosages for vitamin C of 200,000 mg has my immediate and
appreciative attention. Robert F. Cathcart, Ewan Cameron, Garnett Cheney, Ruth
Harrell, John Ellis, William Kaufman, J.W. Anderson, and many other expert
physicians and researchers are to be found fairly, and favorably, mentioned in
the Textbook of Nutritional Medicine. A
number of these names are simply not to be found in any other nutrition
textbook that I have ever seen. It is a pleasure to see them included here.
I am especially pleased that Dr. Werbach includes a
considerable quantity of information on megavitamin treatment of AIDS patients.
This bold and much needed inclusion opens the door for nutritional treatment of
all viral illnesses. I am further delighted to see a section on nutrition and
Down’s syndrome. There are also seldom-mentioned-elsewhere nutritional
approaches to Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, infertility, rosacea, lupus, and
even myopia. These sections make
interesting reading indeed. Truth to be told, ANY section of the book makes for
interesting reading. I was somewhat surprised
to fail to find Alzheimer’s disease listed in either the table of contents or
the index. Look under “Dementia” and you will find it; however, it should have
its own listing.
Dr. Werbach’s attitude towards and discussion of vitamin
side effects is excellent. It is also conservative. He does not hesitate to
caution when caution is due, and yet he clearly states (and proves) that the
safety of megavitamin therapy is far greater than drug therapy. Information on lab nutrition tests, label
units and measurements, vitamin deficiencies, hints for successful practice of
integrative medicine, and the entirely appropriate personal story of how he
came to write his books, are all included.
But the heart of the Textbook is its nearly 700 pages of
clinical recommendations and research summaries. Citations are clearly marked
and reader-friendly; studies are mentioned within the text by authors’ names in
italics. Frequent and well-placed case histories are boxed in gray. There should
be an overall author index as well as a topic index. Preparing such an index is
not a job that I’d want; Dr. Werbach has over 140 full pages of references with
about 40 citations per page. That makes
no fewer than 5,600 references in Textbook of Nutritional Medicine. Yet it is
due to this very great number that the book requires more thorough indexing.
I have relied on Dr. Werbach’s work for ten years. When I prepare an article or lecture, I
refer to his writings as a matter of habit. Before his books, one had to go
back to the Vitamins in Medicine (from the 1950’s) for a really good
single-volume collection of applied therapeutic nutrition research summaries. I
am grateful for this latest, most impressive, and most practical update on a
subject that is so important to us all.
Melvyn Werbach, M.D., with Jeffrey Moss, D.D.S. (1999)
Tarzana, CA: Third Line Press.
740 pages. ISBN 0-9618550-9-6
This review is also posted at
http://www.doctoryourself.com/werbach.html
Tobacco “spa treatments” that are “guaranteed to relax the
mind and soothe the body without inhaling” have been introduced at MacArthur
Place, a trendy San Francisco-area inn. At least in June of this year, you
could get a Tobacco Bath, a Tobacco Salt Scrub, a Tobacco Oil Massage AND a
Tobacco Moisturizing Treatment to boot. “The Garden Spa is the first spa in the
U.S. to offer tobacco-based treatments,”
said manager Bill Blum. “This is the only inside pubic place you will see
tobacco products in use in California.”
Cost of their “Cigar In The Garden” overnight package
starts at $475; the 100-minute treatment can also be purchased a la carte for
$197.
For more information:
email: info@macarthurplace.com
Postal Mail: 29 East MacArthur Street, Sonoma, CA 95476
(Editor’s note: I have no financial connection whatsoever
with this or any other similar establishment, for reasons that I trust are
obvious.)
( www.shazzie.com/news ) and am very happy to
offer your readers these raw food recipes.”
Dark Dream Smoothie
2 bananas, peeled
1 punnet of blueberries
1 papaya, skinned and de-seeded
2 dates, pitted
Chop the dates. Blend all ingredients and drink.
This is a very simple but really tasty soup. You can add
other flavours to it for lots of variation.
1 avocado, peeled and stoned
4 tomatoes
A handful of basil
¼ of a cup of cold pressed olive oil
Blend all ingredients. If it’s too thick add some freshly
made tomato or cucumber juice.
This salad is such comforting one, it will make you glow!
1 bunch of lettuce
1 or 2 fennel bulbs (depending on size)
1 red onion
1 clove of garlic
1 red pepper, de-seeded
1 orange pepper, de-seeded
6 tomatoes
1 cup of pumpkin sprouts or seeds, soaked
4 sticks of celery
2 avocados, peeled and stoned
10 macadamias
1 cup of watercress
4 dates, pitted
Prepare the lettuce in your favourite way, chop the
fennel, onion, peppers, tomatoes, watercress and celery. Finely chop the garlic
and dates, and slice the avocado. Toss all the ingredients together except the
macadamias - you need to throw these on top from a very great height.
(Editor’s note: I especially enjoyed the “Before” and “After”
pictures of some raw-food enthusiasts which are posted at http://www.shazzie.com/raw/transformation/ Send in your snapshots, folks!)
Privacy Statement:
We do not sell our mailing list or your email address to
anyone. You may notice that there is no advertising at http://doctoryourself.com and no advertising
in this newsletter. We have no financial connection with the supplement
industry. We do not sell vitamins or other health products, except for Dr. Saul’s
books, which help fund these free public services.
FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS to this newsletter are available by
simply sending a
“subscribe” message to me at drsaul@doctoryourself.com
AN IMPORTANT NOTE: This newsletter is not in any way
offered as prescription, diagnosis nor treatment for any disease, illness,
infirmity or physical condition. Any form of self-treatment or alternative
health program necessarily must involve an individual’s acceptance of some
risk, and no one should assume otherwise. Persons needing medical care should
obtain it from a physician. Consult your doctor before making any health
decision.
“DOCTOR YOURSELF” “DoctorYourself.com” and “Doctor
Yourself Newsletter” are service marks
of Andrew W. Saul. All rights reserved.
Copyright c 2001 and prior years Andrew W. Saul drsaul@doctoryourself.com
Permission to reproduce single copies of this newsletter FOR
NON-COMMERCIAL,
PERSONAL USE ONLY is hereby granted providing no alteration
of content is
made and authorship credit is given. Additional single
copies will be sent
by postal mail to a practitioner or patient, free of charge,
upon receipt of
a self addressed, stamped envelope only, to Number 8 Van
Buren Street,
Holley, NY 14470 USA Telephone (716) 638-5357
Sign Up for NetZero Platinum Today
Only $9.95 per month!
http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.