http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-EXP-Transmitting-Smallpox.html
|
December 16, 2001 Study Made on Speading Smallpox
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 12:01 p.m. ET Amid heightened concern about bioterrorism, a new study offers a rough
answer to one question: How many people would a smallpox victim likely infect
during an outbreak of the deadly disease? The answer: four to six on average, say researchers at England's Centre
for Applied Microbiology and Research in Salisbury. They report their
conclusion in the Dec. 13 issue of the journal Nature. The director of an American research center challenged the number, which
was derived from a mathematical analysis of data dating to the 18th century.
Recent prior estimates have ranged from about 1.5 to more than 20. Tara O'Toole, director of the Johns Hopkins University Center for Civilian
Biodefense Studies, questioned whether the latest number was in any way
predictive or useful. O'Toole, who did not participate in the study, said an
immense range of variables likely would to come into play in any modern-day
smallpox outbreak. ``Is the (infected) person a school child, is the person an elderly
live-at-home, is the person someone who travels all over the world?'' she
said. ``You can model it with different assumptions and see where it goes and
in what directions, but the notion we can actually identify the transmission
rate (of smallpox) is lunacy.'' In developing the mathematical model, researchers Raymond Gani and Steve
Leach culled a variety of historical data from five 18th century smallpox
outbreaks; a 19th century outbreak in London; a 1972 outbreak in Kosovo; and
various European outbreaks between 1958 and 1973. The study took into account the proportion of the population susceptible
to the disease, socio-economic factors, and the varying levels of immunity to
the disease as a result of vaccinations. Gani and Leach said their findings show smallpox would be transmitted at a
``relatively modest'' rate compared to measles or chickenpox. But, they
noted, ``significant smallpox epidemics could occur, particularly if there
were delays in detecting the first cases or in setting up effective public
health interventions.'' |
||||
|
|
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.