http://www.haciendapub.com/buttram.html
Feature Article
Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine-Induced Encephalitis?
Harold E. Buttram, MD
Shaken baby syndrome (SBS) commonly describes a combination of subdural
hematoma, retinal hemorrhage, and diffuse axonal injury (DAI) as the triad of
diagnostic criteria. In some, the presence of rib or other fractures is also
taken as a sign of abuse.(1-3)
The basic issue to be reviewed here is whether or not in some instances in
which a father, family member, or caretaker has been accused of causing the
death of an infant or child from the SBS, the true cause of death was a
catastrophic vaccine reaction.
This article concerns an unpublished series of 25 cases involving
accusations or convictions for the SBS, largely collected by attorney and jury
counselor Toni Blake of San Diego, California (personal communication, 2000),
as well as some from personal knowledge, which have the following features: 1)
All occurred in fragile infants born from complicated pregnancies. Problems
included prematurity, low birth weights, drug/alcohol problems, diabetic
mothers, or other maternal complications. 2) All infants were 6 months or less
of age. 3) Onset of signs and symptoms occurred at about 2, 4, or 6 months of
age, within 12 days of vaccines. 4) All infants had subdural hematomas. 5) Some
had multiple fractures.
Few published studies on vaccine effects include before-and-after studies of
immune parameters or brain function studies such as electroencephalograms, or
long-term safety monitoring. Inadequate consideration has been given to the
additive or synergistic adverse effects of multiple simultaneous vaccines,
although in the case of toxic chemicals, two compounds together may be 10 times
more toxic than either separately, or 3 compounds 100 times more toxic.(4,5)
Medicolegal
Issues
As reviewed in an the amicus brief prepared for SBS cases by Toni Blake
(personal communication, 2000), the following beliefs have become prevalent in
courts dealing with the SBS: 1) Shaking alone in an otherwise healthy child can
cause a subdural hematoma; 2) non-traumatic new bleeding in an existing
subdural hematoma will always cause only minor symptoms; 3) a child suffering
from an ultimately fatal brain injury will not experience any lucid interval;
4) short-distance falls by children are never fatal; and, 5) retinal hemorrhage
occurs only in shaken babies. There is, however, a body of literature that
casts doubt on the validity of these assumptions:
In the early 1970s, Guthkelch(6) and Caffey(3) offered concepts in the etiology
of the shaken baby syndrome that have become widely accepted. This syndrome was
presented in the context of a battered child with multiple injuries resulting
from multi-directional forces. It was postulated that the weak neck muscles and
the relatively large head size of an infant made him particularly susceptible
to subdural injuries caused by shaking.(7) It should be noted that there was no
experimental model to prove or disprove their theory, and no disinterested
witness in their reports to confirm the shaking. In spite of this, the theory
gradually became accepted as fact. However, several years later Duhaime et al
developed a model in an attempt to demonstrate infant susceptibility to
shaking. This team of scientists was unable to generate the force required to
cause death or serious brain injury unless the head was impacted against a
solid surface.(8,9) The authors of those studies concluded that severe head
injuries commonly diagnosed as shaking injuries require impact to occur and
that shaking alone in an otherwise normal baby is unlikely to cause the SBS.
The statement that rebleeding from a subdural hematoma requires new trauma
is of doubtful validity. It has been demonstrated that the neomembrane
surrounding an organizing subdural hematoma may itself bleed, and that
expansion of a subacute/chronic subdural hemorrhage may cause new bridging
veins to rupture, and that an acute clot may predispose to new bleeding.(10,11)
New bleeding in an established subdural hematoma may occur spontaneously and
without new trauma.(12) In the cited example, the child was in a hospital under
the care of a physician.
Regarding belief #3, at least some children have lucid intervals prior to
the development of symptoms, including those who die.(13,14) Ribas and Jane
state that it is particularly important to emphasize that both contusions and
intracerebral hematomas can cause neurologic deterioration after a lucid
interval.(15)
Regarding belief #4, isolated reports of fatal falls and biomechanical
analysis using experimental animals and adult human volunteers indicate the
potential for serious head injury or death from as little as a two-foot
fall.(7,16-19)
Finally, as to the assumption that retinal hemorrhages are always caused by
nonaccidental head trauma, there is a report of 20 children resuscitated
following events other than trauma, such as near-drowning, asthma, sudden
infant death syndrome, and other causes, in which two children were found to
have retinal hemorrhages.(20) In addition to this, retinal hemorrhages have
been attributed to a vast array of causes, including MMR and DTP vaccines.(21)
It is noteworthy that vaccines such as pertussis are used to induce allergic
encephalomyelitis in laboratory animals.(22) This is characterized by brain
swelling and hemorrhaging similar to that caused by mechanical injuries.(23)
Misdiagnosing a vaccine injury as the SBS has resulted in imprisonments.
Testifying in a case in which a father was accused of causing brain injury to
his child, San Diego pediatric neurologist Thomas Schweller stated: "There
is a tendency in some medical arenas to discount completely the history
provided by the family if you find a subdural hematoma." He cautioned
against assertions of 100 percent certainty, and stated that even a three-foot
fall could cause a fracture.(24)
Issues of
Medical Diagnosis
"Immune Paralysis," a Possible Role in Spread of Infections: There
is a small body of medical literature suggesting that vaccines can bring about
an immune paralysis, opening the way for spread of relatively minor infections,
such as those of a viral nature, to other parts of the body. One such
complication might be viral meningitis. In a small German study, a significant
though temporary drop of T-helper lymphocytes was found in 11 healthy adults
following routine tetanus booster vaccinations; in four subjects, the levels
were as low as those seen in active AIDS patients.(25)
Parenthetically, if this was the result of a single vaccine in healthy
adults, it is sobering to think of the possible consequences of the series of
multiple vaccines given to infants. Unfortunately, other than clinical
observations, we can only speculate as to these consequences. This simple
before-and-after testing of immune parameters has never been repeated, as far
as I am aware. A few studies are to be found that show depressed function of
lymphocytes and segmented neutrophils following vaccines.(26-28) Unfortunately,
these are of limited scope.
Historically, one of the earliest reports of disease spread following
vaccines is found in the 1967 book, The Hazards of Immunization by Sir
Graham Wilson.(29) Although not opposed to vaccines, the author did give an
extensive review of their potential side effects. In a chapter entitled,
"Provocation Disease," he described complications such as paralysis
from poliomyelitis in an arm that had received a diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus
(DPT) vaccine. In more recent times, a similar phenomenon was observed in Oman
during a polio epidemic, in which it was found that a significantly greater
proportion of polio cases had received the DPT vaccine within 30 days before
paralysis than had controls.(30)
As to the possibility that vaccines may result in spread and escalation of
minor viral infections into fulminant meningitis with resultant mimicking of
the SBS, this area appears to remain unexplored.
Brain Edema and Perivascular Lymphocytosis: Other than occasional
anecdotal reports, there is little to be found in the medical literature
implicating vaccines in causing brain edema and perivascular/meningeal
lymphocytic infiltrations in humans, probably because the phenomenon has never
been systematically studied. There are several reports of infants who developed
increased intracranial pressure with bulging fontanelles following DPT
immunization.(31-33) but for the most part we must look to animal experiments
for information in this area.
Perhaps one of the most revealing studies about the nature of vaccine
reactions was that conducted by Munoz and co-workers,(34) in which an
experimental encephalo-myelitis was elicited in mice by the injection of
pertussigen, a derivative of Bordetella pertussis, along with mice
spinal cord extract. Histologic findings of perivascular infiltrates,
consisting largely of lymphocytes in the brain and spinal cord developed as a
result. These findings suggest that histological appearances of vaccine-induced
encephalitis may be similar to those seen in viral meningitis.
Although Munoz mentioned nothing about the presence or absence of brain
edema in his report, Iwasa stressed the swelling of the brain as a complication
of the pertussis vaccine.(23)
Vasculopathies, Autoimmunity, and Cerebral Hemorrhages: A scattering
of reports suggest that the hepatitis B vaccine may play a major role, as yet
largely unrecognized, in hemorrhagic complications from vaccines. Among the
children diagnosed with the SBS were quadruplets who suffered subdural
hemorrhages or bloody spinal fluid following hepatitis B vaccines. The mother
of these children has been sentenced to l72.5 years in prison.
In a collection of abstracts from Med-Line research, from 1990 to October
1997, on adverse reactions from the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, Dr. Andrea
Valeri of Italy catalogued a total of 45 different types of reactions in the
world literature (personal communication, 2000) Among these were necrotizing
vasculitis,(35) vaccine-induced autoimmunity,(36) and segmentary occlusion of
the central retinal vein.(37) In addition, vasculitis following hepatitis B
vaccine has been reported.(38) Thrombocytopenia is listed as a possible
complication in the Physicians' Desk Reference, 2001. In a report of 18
deaths of neonates following the hepatitis B vaccine by the Vaccine Adverse
Event Reporting System, 1991-1998, hemorrhagic phenomena were common, including
two patients with cerebral hemorrhages, four with pulmonary bleeding, one with
bloody diarrhea, and several with blood in upper airway passages.(39) A report
in Postgraduate Medicine on acute hemorrhagic encephalitis cites
vaccines as one of the possible causes.(40)
Reports of autoimmune/neurological type reactions from hepatitis B vaccine
include the following: polyneuropathy,(41) uveitis,(42) Guillain-Barre
Syndrome,(43) myasthenia gravis,(44) erythema nodosum,(45) CNS
demyelination,(46-48) optic neuritis,(49) transverse myelitis,(50) visual
loss,(51) rheumatoid arthritis,(52) and Reiter's syndrome and arthritis.(53)
In a study devised to provide an animal model for the systemic and
neurological complications observed following the pertussis vaccine in children,
Steinman and coworkers discovered a lethal shock-like syndrome in mice after
immunization with pertussis vaccine and sensitization to bovine serum albumin.
Post-mortem examination of the brains revealed diffuse vascular congestion and
parenchymal hemorrhages in both cortex and white matter.(54)
As early as 1975, Urbaschek described the role of pertussis endotoxin in
bleeding and coagulation disorders.(55) More recently, McCuskey et al described
the initial responses to endotoxemia as microvascular inflammation with
activation of endothelium from its normal anticoagulation state to a
procoagulation state.(56) Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine
also points out that the endotoxin from gram negative bacteria activates
several steps in the coagulation process.(57)
Platelet injury by endotoxin may result in a dramatic rise in serotonin,
which can initiate coronary chemoreflex causing hypotension, bradycardia, and
cardiac collapse, sometimes seen in premature infants following
vaccination.(58) It is also said that the hemorrhagic complications from the
"black plague" of the Middle Ages were simply due to an unusually
virulent form of endotoxin, a property common to all disease-causing bacteria
(R. Reisinger, personal communication, 2000).
Consideration must also be given to the possibility that the various
vaccines, given in combination, may be synergistic in causing hypersensitivity
and autoimmunity.
At least two of the vaccines, H. influenza type b (Hib) and
pertussis, are noted for their sensitizing potencies(59) and are routinely
given together in infancy.
A New Syndrome? Based on observation and a limited but suggestive
body of medical literature, it appears that we may be witnessing in many SBS
cases the adverse effects from interactions of highly potent vaccines given in
combination. These potentially include: Hepatitis B (hemorrhagic
vasculopathies, autoimmune reactions, neuropathies), Hemophilus influenza (hypersensitization),
tetanus (hyper-sensitization), and pertussis (hypersensitization, brain edema,
and the effects of endotoxin in causing vascular inflammation and
hyper-coagulability).
There now appears to be a new syndrome that develops within a 12-day period
following immunizations, and which may include elements of adverse reactions
from each of the vaccines listed above. The most important of these include
brain edema and inflammation of blood vessels, resulting in increased fragility
and friability of blood vessel walls. These in turn may lead to spontaneous
hemorrhages from a shearing of subdural blood vessels and the development of
subdural hematomas, thus mimicking what is now thought to represent the SBS.
These findings are as yet largely unrecognized because unsought. In the name
of justice to those now wrongfully imprisoned for child abuse leading to the
SBS, and to those who will be accused in the future, let us hope that this area
receives the investigation that it deserves.
Vaccines, Scurvy, and Hemorrhagic Diatheses: In the 1970s, infant mortality
among the aborigines was as high as 50 percent in some areas. Dr. Archivides
Kalokerinos recognized cases of scurvy among children, whose diets were very
poor. Observing that the children frequently died following immunizations,
especially if they had colds, he recognized that there might be a connection
between vitamin C deficiency and the deaths from vaccines. With improved
nutrition and regular vitamin C supplementation, infant mortality was virtually
abolished.(60) As a result of this work he was awarded the Australian Medal of
Merit in 1978.
One of the primary roles of vitamin C in the body being that of producing
and maintaining connective tissue, Dr. Kalokerinos hypothesized that with minor
viral infections further depleting the body's limited stores, the
administration of vaccines would precipitate fulminating scurvy in children
already deficient in vitamin C. One of the primary complications of scurvy
being hemorrhage from weakened blood vessels, vitamin C deficiency could
conceivably play a role in vaccine-induced encephalopathy/hemorrhagic syndrome.
The Latent Period Following Immunizations: According to the current
guidelines of the Congressional Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, the onset
of encephalitis must occur within a specified time period, depending on the
vaccine, for the vaccines to be recognized as having caused the encephalitis.
(The accepted latent period for pertussis vaccine reaction is 3 days, and that
for measles vaccine, 7 days). Inaccuracy in designating this time range could
cause many misdiagnoses.
Most early literature dealing with vaccine-induced encephalitis is related
to the pertussis vaccine. In 1930, Flexner noted a strong tendency for the
nervous system manifestations to declare themselves between the 10th and 13th
days.(61) In a review of 108 cases recorded before 1929,(62) the onset of
encephalitis was strikingly constant, usually observed between the 10th and
12th days following vaccination, commonly with a febrile period on the 7th and
8th days followed by recovery until the onset of encephalitis. In 1929, an
increase in severe neurological complications following infections and
inoculations was noted, occurring on about the 11th day after vaccination.(63)
More than 50 years later, Munoz found the same latent period of 11 to 13
days in a mice study of experimental encephalomyelitis elicited by injection of
pertussigen.(34)
Literature in the 1980s and 1990s reported an entirely different pattern,
with the onset of encephalopathy largely falling within a 3-day period
following immunization.(64-66) We can only speculate the reason for this
changing pattern. Perhaps it could be attributed to the fact that, in those
early years, children may have been given the pertussis vaccine alone or
possibly in combination with tetanus and diphtheria vaccines, whereas in recent
years they have been receiving the polio, hepatitis B, and Hib vaccines at the
same time.
Other studies throwing light on the latent period include one from Japan,
showing two peaks of histamine sensitivity in mice from pertussis vaccine, one
on the 4th day and another on the l2th day.(67) In 1976, 20 percent of cases of
severe neurologic damage following DPT vaccine occurred later than 3 days
post-vaccine.(68)
In Vaccination and Behavioral Disorders by Greg Wilson, the author
made the following comments about the latent period:(69) Contemporary
studies on the pertussis vaccine select an arbitrary time limit in which
reactions have to occur to be considered as vaccine related. This time limit is
usually from 3 to 7 days. Perhaps the only study which explores the dynamics of
the post-DPT reactions is an independent Australian study by Karlsson and
Scheibner which, with a monitor which followed breathing volumes, found
particular times of stress-induced breathing following DPT injections.
Times of stress-induced breathing occurred as early as day 2 and as late as
day 21.(70)
Coulter and Fisher provide, in their book, A Shot in the Dark, a
number of case reports, both published and unpublished, from their own files,
with latent periods longer than 3 days.(71) However, they found an almost
insuperable difficulty in obtaining dependable data on the latent period due to
the extreme reluctance of doctors to report vaccine reactions, a pattern which
has existed since the early days of vaccine programs.
There are a number of reasons for this reluctance. From their earliest years
of training, doctors have been taught to look upon vaccines as one of the
greatest achievements of medical science, and any question about them is often
looked upon as disloyalty to the profession. "Most doctors have been
taught very little in medical school about reactions, or the neurologic damage
that can be caused by the pertussis vaccine."(72) A lawyer specializing in
defending vaccine-damaged children stated: "As is the case with many
pertussis vaccine-injured children, none of the treating physicians would
commit themselves to a final etiological diagnosis. It is strange that parents
of pertussis vaccine-damaged children often can only get an etiological
diagnosis by hiring an attorney and seeing one of the few recognized experts in
the U.S. on post-pertussis vaccine encephalopathy."(72)
Either of the two classes of immunity, humoral (antibody-producing) or
cellular, can produce autoimmunity.(72) Obviously, the 3 to 7 day limitations
on the latent period, which now stands as a medicolegal standard, excludes a
recognition of the delayed-type (cellular) autoimmune reactions, which are
thought to have latent periods ranging between 2 and 3 months.(73) By
inference, it even denies their existence. Little is known about
vaccine-induced autoimmunity because the area has been largely neglected in
clinical and laboratory studies.(74) Large numbers of cases of vaccine-induced
cellular autoimmunity could occur unrecognized and unreported because not
sought.
Allergic Sensitization: The increasing incidence of allergic
disorders in Western nations is now universally recognized, with every third
child in industrialized societies suffering an allergic disorder.(75) Since
this trend coincides with vaccine programs, reports are now appearing on the
question of a possible causal relation. Among these are four controlled studies
from widely separated geographical areas showing a marked increase in allergic
disorders among fully vaccinated children as compared to those with limited or
no vaccines.(76-79) Further indications of the propensities of vaccines,
especially pertussis and Hib, to induce hypersensitivity reactions and/or
encephalitis are to be found in a number of studies.(80-83) The action of
vaccines in shifting the immune profile in favor of the T helper 2 (Th2)
system#84 could play a role in the rapid increase in atopic disorders.
The Hib vaccine, which shares notoriety with pertussis for its sensitizing
potential, paradoxically causes a temporary reduction in antibody in most
adults and children following immunization. This could increase risk of
invasive disease should the subject be harboring a colonization of H.
influenza at the time of Hib immunization.(85)
Additionally, a 1991 report by the National Institute of Medicine cited
evidence of a causal relation between the DPT vaccine and anaphylaxis.(86)
Rib and Other Skeletal Fractures: Although skeletal fractures in
themselves are not attributable to vaccine reactions, when they are present
they are often used as evidence of abuse by prosecutors in SBS trials.
In the case of rib fractures, a study of 2,080 children seen at a pediatric
trauma center found that among 33 children with multiple rib fractures, these
injuries were accompanied by severe internal thoracic injuries in 85 percent of
the cases.(87) An absence of internal injuries, therefore, would weigh heavily
for spontaneous fractures and against abuse.
There are two situations in which spontaneous fractures are prone to take
place: temporary brittle bone disease (TBBD) and scurvy, with imperfect
connective tissue formation in fetal or infant skeletal tissue. In 26 infants
with multiple fractures that fit the criteria of TBBD,(88,89) there was a
striking association between TBBD and decreased fetal movement during
pregnancy, which might occur in extreme prematurity, multiple-birth
pregnancies, and chronic oligohydramnios as a result of inadequate uterine
space for fetal movement.
Vitamin C deficiency may contribute to inadequate connective tissue
formation in the bones before birth, making them susceptible to green-stick
fractures and/or metaphyseal plate (costochrondal junction) slippages in utero
or during the mechanical stresses of childbirth. During the trial of a father
accused of causing the SBS in which there were rib fractures, Dr. Kalokerinos
quoted from an older text dealing with scurvy that states:
Scurvy disrupts these areas, the bone breaks down, and the ribs may
over-ride, forming in typical cases "beads." Then healing commences
with new bone formation looking just like true healing fractures. Furthermore,
not all the ribs may be involved in this process, and the changes will not all
occur at the same time --- giving the appearance of multiple fractures of
different ages.(90)
A study of children at the Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
has cast doubt on the acceptance of multiple metaphyseal plate fractures as
definite roentgenologic evidence of battering. This type of fracture occurs in
scurvy without undue trauma to the child.(91)
Thimerosal (Mercury) Content: Some vaccines given at ages 2, 4, and 6
months of age contain thimerosal, including diphtheria/tetanus/acellular
pertussis (DTaP) (25 micrograms of mercury in most preparations), hepatitis B
(12.5 micrograms in some preparations), and Hib (25 micrograms in some
preparations).(92) It is possible that some infants receive more than l00 times
the amount of mercury that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says is the
maximum allowable daily exposure. Current EPA standards limit the daily safe
dose of mercury to 0.1 µg/kg, or less than 1.0 µg for the average two-month-old
infant.(93)
For centuries, mercury has been known as a potent neurotoxin and one of the
most toxic of the heavy metals. Recently it has also been shown to be
sensitizing,(84) so that along with pertussis and the Hib vaccines, we have
three potentially sensitizing agents in the vaccines given to this age group.
Brain Function: In a 1955 study, electroencephalograms (EEGs) were
performed on 83 children before and after pertussis immunization. In two
children, the EEGs became abnormal following the vaccines in the absence of
signs or symptoms, suggesting that mild but possibly significant cerebral reactions
may occur in addition to the reported very severe neurological changes.(94)
The implications of this study are enormous, considering the very large
number of children diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder,
previously called "minimal brain dysfunction." Unfortunately, as Greg
Wilson commented, "Studies such as Low's, which closely examine individual
children, are extremely rare in the study of vaccine reactions and virtually
nonexistent in today's literature."(70) A literature search disclosed only
one other comparable study, done in Japan. Immunizations were given to 61
children with a history of febrile seizures or epilepsy, who had not had a
seizure for one year. Epileptic spikes reappeared after 10 immunizations and
increased after 10 out of 73 vaccines given, including DTaP, diphtheria/
tetanus (DT), and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG).(95)
Conclusion
This article has been written to show that the theories on which the SBS is based
are both undocumented and flawed and that convictions in many cases of the SBS
may have been the result of misdiagnosis, the true cause of death or injury
having been vaccine-related.
The larger issue is the adequacy of vaccine safety testing. There is a
growing public outcry over mandatory vaccines, much of it originating from
parents who believe their children have been seriously harmed.
Parents demand the right to accept or reject vaccines for their children
based on informed consent. Some believe that the dangers of current vaccines
may approach or even exceed the dangers of the infectious diseases themselves.
It is difficult to answer their questions because there have been little more
than token investigations of potential serious adverse effects. We need
definitive investigations into both the immediate and longterm effects on the
immunologic and neurologic systems.
Acknowledgment: The inspiration for this article has been largely the
case of Alan Joe Yurko, an infant who died at 10 weeks of age, soon after
receiving a combination of 6 vaccines. The father is now serving a life
sentence, having been convicted (wrongly, many believe) of causing the SBS.
References
1. David TJ. Shaken baby (shaken impact) syndrome: non-accidental head
injury in infancy. Royal Soc Med 1999;99(Nov):556-561.
2. Weston IT. The pathology of child abuse. In: Heifer RE, Kempe CH, eds, The
Battered Child, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1968, pp. 77-100.
3. Caffey J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants: its potential
residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Am J Dis
Child 1972;124:161-169.
4. Chester AC, Levine PH. Concurrent sick building syndrome and chronic fatigue
syndrome: epidemic neuromyasthenia revised. Clinical Infect Disease
1996;18(Suppl b):S3-S48.
5. Abou-Donia MB, Wilmarth KR, Jensen KF, Oehme FW, Kurt TL. Neurotoxicity
resulting from exposure to pyridostigmine bromide, DEET, and permethrin:
implications of Gulf War chemical exposures. J Toxicol & Environ Health
1996;48:35-56.
6. Guthkelch AN. Infantile subdural hematoma and its relationship to whiplash
injury. BMJ 1971;11:430-431.
7. Plunkett J. Shaken baby syndrome and the death of Matthew Eappen: A forensic
pathologist's response. Am J Forensic Med and Path 1999;20:17-21.
8. Duhaime A-C, Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE, et al. The shaken baby syndrome: a
clinical, pathological, and bio-mechanical study. J Neurosurgery
1987;66:409-415.
9. Duhaime A-C, Alario AJ, Lewander WJ, et al. Head injury in very young
children: mechanisms, injury types and ophthalmologic findings. Pediatrics
1992;90:179-185.
10. Kawakami S, Chikama M, Tamiya T, Shimamura Y. Coagulation and fibrinolysis
in chronic subdural hematoma. J Neurosurgery 1989;25:25-29.
11. Parent AD. Pediatric subdural hematoma: a retrospective comparative
analysis. Pediatric Neurosurgery 1992;18:266-271.
12. Lindenborg R. Mechanical injuries in the brain and meninges, In: Spitz W.,
ed., Medicolegal Investigation of Death: guidelines for the application of
pathology to crime investigations, ed 3, Springfield, Charles C. Thomas, 1993,
pp. 585-636.
13. Nashelsky MB, Dix ID. The time interval between lethal infant shaking and
onset of symptoms: a review of the shaken baby syndrome literature. Am J
Forensic Med Pathol 1995;16:154-157.
14. Plunkett J. Restricting the time of injury in fatal inflicted head injuries
(letter). Child Abuse Neglect 1998;22:943-944.
15. Ribas GC, Jane JA. Traumatic contusions and intracerebral hematomas. J
Neurotrauma 1992;9(Supp D):S269.
16. Gurdjian ES, Roberts VL, Thomas LM. Tolerance curves of acceleration and
intracranial pressure and protective index in experimental head injury. J
Trauma 1966;6:600-604.
17. Mahajen BM, Beine WB. Impact attenuation performance of surface installed
under playground equipment. Report to the Consumer Safety Commission, U.S.
Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.,
Publication # NBSIR 79, Feb. l979, p. 1707.
18. Reichelderfer TB, Overbach A, Greensher J. Unsafe playgrounds? Pediatrics
1979;64:962-963.
19. Collantes M. Playground surfaces and head injury: Evaluation of the
importance of using the Head Injury Criteria (HIC) to estimate the likelihood
of head impact injury as a result of a fall onto playground surface materials.
U.S. Product Safety Commission, Washington D.C., 1990.
20. Goetting MG, Sowa B. Retinal hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary resuscitation
in children: an etiologic reevaluation. Pediatrics 1990;85:585-588.
21. Roy FH. Ocular Differential Diagnosis, ed 6. Philadelphia, Lippincott,
Williams & Wilkins, 1997.
22. Levine S, Lowinski R. Hyperacute encephalomyelitis. Am J Pathol
1973;37:247-250.
23. Iwasa S, Ishida S, Akama K. Swelling of the brain caused by pertussis
vaccine: its quantitative determination and the responsible factors in the
vaccine. Japan J Med Sci Biol 1985;38(2):53-65.
24. Hanchette J. Kaplan S. Vaccines are blamed for injuries: Defendants
increasingly turn to ill effects of inoculations to explain shaken baby
syndrome. Gannett News Service, Detroit News, Sept. 4, 1998.
25. Eibl M. Abnormal T-lymphocyte subpopulations in healthy subjects after
tetanus booster immunization, (letter). New Engl J Med 1984;310:198-199.
26. Toraldo R, Tolone C, Catalanotti P, et al. Effect of measles-mumps-rubella
vaccination on polymorphonuclear function in children. Acta Paediatr
1992;81:887-890.
27. Munyer TP, Mangi RJ, Dolan T, Kantor FS. Depressed lymphocyte function
after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination. J Infect Dis 1975;132:75-80.
28. Beckenhauer WH, Gill MA. Immunosuppression with combined vaccines. J Am Vet
Med Assn 1983;183:389-390.
29. Wilson, G. The Hazards of Immunization. London, Athlone Press, The
University of London, 1967.
30. Sutter RW, Atriarca PA, Suleiman AJ, et al. Attributable risk of DPT
(diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine) injections in provoking paralytic
poliomyelitis in Oman during a large outbreak. J Infect Dis 1992;165:444-449.
31. Jacob J. Manning F. Increased intracranial pressure after
diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus immunization. J Dis Child 1979;133:217-218.
32. Gross TP, Milstien JB, Kuritsky JN. Bulging fontanelle after immunization
with diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine and diphtheria-tetanus vaccine. J
Pediatr 1989;114:423-425.
33. Mathus R, Kumari S. Bulging fontanelle following DPT. Indian Pediatr 1981;18:417-418.
34. Munoz JJ, Bernard CC, Mackay IR. Elicitation of experimental
encephalomyelitis in mice with the aid of pertussigen. Cellular Immunology
1984;83:92-100.
35. Kerleau JM, Levesque H, Lair G, et al. La Vaccinazione anti-hepatite B e
una nuova cause di vasculite necrotizzante? (lettera) [Is hepatits B
vaccination a new cause of necrotizing vasculitis?] Rev Med Interne,
1997;18:491-492.
36. Cohen AD, Shoenfeld Y. Autoimmunita indoni dai vaccini. J Autoimmunity
1996;9:699-703.
37. Granel B, Disdier P, Devin F, et al. [Occlusion of the central retinal vein
after vaccination against viral hepatitis B with recombinant vaccines: 4
cases]. Presse Med 1977;26:62-65.
38. Cockwell P. Vasculitis related to hepatitis B vaccine (letter). BMJ
1991;301;1281.
39. Niu MT, Salive ME, Ellenberg SS. Neonatal deaths after hepatitis B vaccine:
the vaccine adverse event reporting system, 1991-1998. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
1999;153:1279-1282.
40. Behan PO, Moore MJ, Lamarche JB. Acute necrotizing hemorrhagic encephalopathy.
Postgraduate Medicine 1973;54(4):154-160.
41. Ribera EF. Polyneuropathy associated with administration of hepatitis B
vaccine. New Engl J Med 1983;309:614-615.
42. Fried M, Conen D, Conzelmann M, Steinemann E. Uveitis after hepatitis B
vaccination (letter). Lancet 1987;2(8559):631-632.
43. Shaw FE. Postmarketing surveillance for neurologic adverse events reported
after hepatitis B vaccination: Experience of the first three years. Amer J
Epidemiol 1988;127:337-352.
44. Biron P, Montpetit P, Infante-Rivard C, Lery L. Myasthenia gravis after
general anesthesia and hepatitis B vaccine. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2685.
45. Goolsby PL. Erythema nodosum after Recombivax HB hepatitis B vaccine. New
Engl J Med 1989;321:1198-1199.
46. Herroelen L, de Keyser J, Ebinger G. Central-nervous-system demyelination
after immunisation with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. Lancet
1991;338:1174-1175.
47. Nadler JP. Multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B vaccine. Clin Infect Dis
1993;17:928-929.
48. Kaplanski G, Retornaz F, Durand J, Soubeyrand J. Central nervous system
demyelination after vaccination against hepatitis B and HLA haplotype (letter).
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;58:758-759.
49. Anonymous. Hepatitis B vaccines: reported reactions, World Health
Organization Adverse Drug Reaction Bulletin, Aug, 1990.
50. Trevisani T, Gattinara GC, Caraceni P, et al. Transverse myelitis following
hepatitis B vaccination (letter). J Hepatol 1993;19(2):317-318.
51. Brezin A. Visual loss and eosinophilia after recombinant hepatitis B
vaccine. Lancet 1993;342:563-564.
52. Vautier G. Acute sero-positive rheumatoid arthritis occurring after
hepatitis vaccination. Brit J Rheumatol 1994;33:991.
53. Hassan W. Reiter's syndrome and reactive arthritis in health care workers
after vaccination. BMJ 1994;309:94.
54. Steinman L, Sriram S, Adelman NE, et al. Murine model for pertussis vaccine
encephalopathy: linkage to H-2. Nature 1982;299:738-740.
55. Urbaschek. Fortschr Med 1975;93:1067-1071.
56. McCuskey et al. Review: the microcirculation during endotoxemia,
Cardiovascular Res 1996;32:752-763.
57. Keith R Powell. Sepsis and shock. In: Harrison's Principles of Internal
Medicine, ed 14. New York, McGraw-Hill, pp. 747-748.
58. Pourcyrous M, Korones SB, Crouse D, Bada HS. Interleukin-6; C-reactive protein,
and abnormal cardiorespiratory responses to immunization in premature infants.
Pediatrics 1998;101:461.
59. Terpstra GK, Raaijmakers JA, Kreukniet J. Comparison of vaccination of mice
and rats with Hemophilus influenza and Bordetella pertussis as models. Clin Exp
Pharmac Physiol 1979;6:139-149.
60. Kalokerinos A. Every Second Child. Australia, Thomas Nelson, 1974.
61. Flexner S. Post-vaccinal encephalitis and allied conditions. JAMA
1930;94:305-311.
62. Gorter E. Post-vaccinal encephalitis. JAMA 1933;101:1871-1874.
63. Anon. Postinfectious encephalitis: a problem of increasing importance. JAMA
1929;92:1523-1524.
64. Menkes JH, Kinsbourne M. Workshop on neurologic complications of pertussis
and pertussis vaccination. Neuropediatrics 1990;21:171-176.
65. Menkes JH, Neurologic complications of pertussis vaccine. Ann Neurol
1990;23:428.
66. Cody CL, Baraff LJ, Cherry JD, Marcy SM, Manclark CR. Nature and rates of
adverse reactions associated with DTP and DT immunization in infants and
children. Pediatrics 1981;68:650-660.
67. Horiuchi S et al. Two different histamine-sensitizing activities of
pertussis vaccine observed in mice on the 4th and 12th days of sensitization.
Japan J Med Sci Biol 1993;46:17-27.
68. Fox R. Letter: immunization against whooping cough. BMJ
1976;1(6007):458-459.
69. Wilson G. Vaccination and Behavioral Disorders. Linsmore, NSW, Australia,
Tuntable Creek Publishing, 2000, p. 49.
70. Karlsson L, Scheibner V. Association between non-specific stress syndrome,
DPT injections and cot death. Presented at Second Immunization Conference,
Canberra, May 27-29, 1991.
71. Coulter HL, Fisher BL. A Shot in the Dark. Garden City Park, New York,
Avery Publishing Group, 1991.
72. Janeway CA. Immunobiology, ed 4. New York, Current Biology Publications, 1999,
p. 495.
73. Shoenfeld Y. Aron-Maor A. Vaccination and autoimmunity - 'vaccinosis': a
dangerous liaison? J Autoimmunity 2000;14:1-10.
74. Cohen DC, Shoenfeld Y. Vaccine-induced autoimmunity. J Autoimmunity
1996;9:699-703.
75. Steering Committee, the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in
Childhood (ISAAC). Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma,
rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema. Lancet 1998;351:1225-1232.
76. Odent ME. Pertussis vaccine and asthma: is there a link? JAMA 1994;271:229-231.
77. Alm JS, Swartz J, Lilja G, Scheynius A, Pershagen G. Atopy in children with
anthroposophic lifestyle. Lancet 1999;353(9163):1485-1488.
78. Kemp T, Pearce N, Fitzharris P, et al. Is infant immunization a risk factor
for childhood asthma or allergy? Epidemiology 1997;8:678-680.
79. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H. Effects of diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus or
tetanus vaccination on allergies and allergy-related respiratory symptoms among
children and adolescents in the United States. J Manipulative & Physiol
Therapeutics 2001;23:1-10.
80. Kosecka U, Berin MC, Perdue MH. Pertussis adjuvant prolongs intestinal
hypersensitivity. Intl Arch Allergy Immunol 1999;119:205-211.
81. Munoz JJ, Peacock MG, Hadlow WJ. Anaphylaxis or so-called encephalopathy in
mice sensitized to an antigen with the aid of pertussigen (pertussis toxin).
Infection & Immunity 1987;55:1004-1008.
82. Odelram H, Granstrom M, Hedenskog S, Duchen K, Bjorksten B. Immunoglobulin
E and G responses to pertussis toxin after booster immunization in relation to
atopy, local reactions and aluminum content in the vaccines. Pediatric Allergy
Immunol 1994;5:8-123.
83. Patrizi A. Sensitization to thimerosal in atopic children. Contact
Dermatitis 1999;40(2):94-97.
84. Taylor-Robinson AW. Multiple vaccine effects on atopy. Allergy
1999;54:398-399.
85. Daum RS, Sood SK, Osterholm MT, et al. Decline in serum antibody to the
capsule of the Hemophilus influenza type b in the immediate post-immunization
period. J Pediatrics 1999;114:742-747.
86. Institute of Medicine. Adverse Effects of Pertussis and Rubella Vaccines,
Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 1991.
87. Garcia VF, Gotschall CS, Eichelberger MR, Bowman LM. Rib fractures in
children: a marker for severe trauma. J Trauma 1990;30:695-700.
88. Miller ME. Temporary brittle bone disease, a true entity? Seminars in
Perinatology 1999;23:174-182.
89. Miller ME, Hangartner TN. Temporary brittle bone disease associated with
decreased fetal movement and osteopenia. Calcified Tissue Intl 1999;64:137-143.
90. Hess AF. Scurvy, Past and Present. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott Co., 1920.
91. Hiller HG. Battered or not - a reappraisal of metaphyseal fragility. Amer J
Roentgenology Radiotherapy & Nuclear Medicine 1972;114:241-246.
92. Institute for Vaccine Safety, Johns Hopkins University,
www.vaccinesafety.edu/thi-table.htm.
93. Halsey NA. Limiting infant exposure to thimerosal in vaccines and other
sources of mercury. JAMA 1999;282:1763-1766.
94. Low AL. Electroencephalographic studies following pertussis immunization. J
Pediatrics 1955;47:35-39.
95. Nouno, Togawa K, Yamatogi Y, et al. Adverse effects on EEG and clinical
condition after immunizing children with convulsive disorders. Acta Paediatr
Japonica 1990;32:357-360.
Dr. Buttram is a diplomat of the American Board of Environmental Medicine
and a practicing physician in Quakertown, Pennsylvania. E-mail:
foffice@woodmed.com.
Originally published in the Medical Sentinel 2001;6(3):83-89. Copyright ©2001
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.