http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7326/1388/f

 

BMJ 2001;323:1388 ( 15 December )

News extra

Parents lose compensation battle for care of disabled child

Annette Tuffs Heidelberg

The Federal Court in Karlsruhe, Germany, has rejected financial claims from parents who were demanding compensation for the upkeep of their handicapped child.

The parents brought the case against their gynaecologists after malformations of one twin was not been diagnosed during pregnancy. An abortion was therefore never discussed beween doctors and parents. One of the identical girl twins was born without one leg and has severe handicaps to the other leg and to one arm. She is now dependent on a wheelchair, whereas the other twin was healthy at birth and has remained so.

The parents said that the doctors should have been able to recognise the malformations during ultrasound examinations. They argued that, had they known about the handicaps they would have decided on an abortion because the birth of a handicapped child would have put the mother at risk of severe depression. She had already had psychological treatment.

This would agree with the current so called "social medical indication" of the abortion law from 1995, which weighs the fetus's right to live against the psychological and medical damage to the mother from continuing the pregnancy.

The judges in Karslruhe said, however, that an abortion of the handicapped twin would have been illegal because it would have most likely led either to the death of the other healthy twin or to severe injuries. Only an expectation of very severe handicaps in one twin or an extreme and exceptional situation of the mother could have justified the abortion of one handicapped twin and the threatened death of the healthy one, they argued. Therefore, financial compensation could not be awarded.
 

Email this article to a friend

Send a response to this article

Download to Citation Manager

Search Medline for articles by:
Tuffs, A.

Alert me when:
New articles cite this article

Collections under which this article appears:
End of Life Decisions
Patient - other
Pregnancy


ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.