http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/323/7326/1388/f
BMJ 2001;323:1388 ( 15 December )
Annette Tuffs Heidelberg
The Federal Court in Karlsruhe, Germany, has rejected financial claims from parents
who were demanding compensation for the upkeep of their handicapped child.
The parents brought the case against their gynaecologists after
malformations of one twin was not been diagnosed during pregnancy. An abortion
was therefore never discussed beween doctors and parents. One of the identical
girl twins was born without one leg and has severe handicaps to the other leg
and to one arm. She is now dependent on a wheelchair, whereas the other twin
was healthy at birth and has remained so.
The parents said that the doctors should have been able to recognise the
malformations during ultrasound examinations. They argued that, had they known
about the handicaps they would have decided on an abortion because the birth of
a handicapped child would have put the mother at risk of severe depression. She
had already had psychological treatment.
This would agree with the current so called "social medical
indication" of the abortion law from 1995, which weighs the fetus's right
to live against the psychological and medical damage to the mother from
continuing the pregnancy.
The judges in Karslruhe said, however, that an abortion of the handicapped
twin would have been illegal because it would have most likely led either to
the death of the other healthy twin or to severe injuries. Only an expectation
of very severe handicaps in one twin or an extreme and exceptional situation of
the mother could have justified the abortion of one handicapped twin and the
threatened death of the healthy one, they argued. Therefore, financial
compensation could not be awarded.
|
|||||
|
|
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.