http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/1257991p-1326537c.html
They are as
lively and rosy-cheeked as any 5- and 6-year-old girls, their long, blond hair
gleaming in the sun as they swing upside down from the monkey bars at the
playground.
But Skyla and
Iris Foxfoot are not like most 5- and 6-year-olds in America. The Nevada County
children have not been immunized against childhood diseases such as measles,
chicken pox and haemophilus meningitis.
"I think
they are healthier for it," said their mother, Cindy Foxfoot, a licensed
midwife. "I think their immune systems are stronger for it."
Foxfoot and
her husband are among a relatively large number of parents in rural Nevada
County who, based on personal beliefs, have chosen to exempt their children
from vaccinations otherwise required by state law. In California, people can
exercise that option simply by signing the back of a school immunization
record.
Last year,
California had its highest rate of "personal beliefs exemptions" in
20 years, at just more than three-quarters of a percent of all entering
kindergartners, or about 4,000 children.
Even so,
Nevada County stands out. Last year, the Sierra foothills county had the
highest rate of exempted kindergartners and the second-highest rate of exempted
seventh-graders in California. More than 6 percent, or 54 out of 848
kindergartners, were exempted, and more than 11 percent, or 126 out of 1,130
seventh-graders. Statewide, just over 1 percent of seventh-graders were exempt
last year.
Nevada
County's exemption rates are unusual even among the state's rural counties.
Tehama County, which has nearly the same number of entering kindergartners, had
a 1.3 percent exemption rate last year; Yuba, with just over 1,000 entering
kindergartners, had a 1 percent rate.
According to
many in Nevada County, the difference has a lot to do with the character of the
place and its people. Many residents have adopted "holistic"
lifestyles, educating their children at home, eating organic foods and
preferring natural remedies to pharmaceuticals for what ails them.
"To me,
(worrying about these diseases) is not what life is about," said the
mother of a 2-year-old boy who has not had his shots, "because I have the
knowledge of using herbs, I live in a community where alternative health is
supported, and I have a close group of other parents who don't vaccinate."
Since the
beginning of the last century, vaccinating children against potentially deadly
or disabling diseases has been a widely accepted medical practice. The
eradication of smallpox through worldwide vaccination campaigns is hailed as
one of the greatest public health triumphs of the last century. The polio
vaccine, introduced in 1962, has eliminated the disease from the Western Hemisphere.
But in recent
years, vaccinations once considered routine have come under attack, mainly from
parent groups. The trend stems, in part, from a growing interest in holistic
medicine. But with so many diseases under control, some parents also feel freer
to weigh the potentially dangerous side effects vaccines can pose.
"Because
of our success in immunizations, we have lost our memory of how bad these
diseases really are," said Dr. Natalie Smith, chief of the immunization
branch of the state Department of Health Services.
Californians
have been able to opt out of childhood vaccination programs since the early
1970s. California is among 22 states that offer personal-belief or religious
exemptions in addition to medical exemptions.
Efforts to
establish exemption programs in New Jersey and Texas were defeated in recent
years. In Iowa, on the other hand, the state Legislature recently killed an
attempt by health officials to end religious exemptions.
Perhaps the
most high-profile debate involving vaccines stems from suspicions linking
measles, mumps and rubella vaccine to autism. Many parents of autistic children
say their children seemed normal until soon after the first inoculation,
typically given between 12 and 18 months of age.
Last year,
Congress' Committee on Government Reform held lengthy hearings to explore the
possible link. The committee chairman, Congressman Dan Burton, R-Ind., told the
story of his own grandson who was diagnosed with autism soon after getting
immunized, and called for more research.
Because of
increasing concerns, the federal government has asked the national Institute of
Medicine to set up a committee to analyze theories about immunization safety
concerns.
Meanwhile,
the 20-year-old National Vaccine Information Center, a parent-led safety
organization, has called for a congressional investigation into the nation's
mass vaccination program. They argue that not enough is known about the
potential harm vaccines may cause to justify routine immunization of every
child.
"We
believe the one-size-fits-all approach does not acknowledge biodiversity,"
said Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the center. The center
played a role in the Food and Drug Administration decision in 1996 to develop a
safer vaccine against pertussis, or whooping cough.
Over time,
concerns have been raised about possible links between inoculations and a range
of conditions, including juvenile diabetes, asthma, attention deficit disorder
and sudden infant death syndrome.
Medical
experts say there is no firm evidence to support such claims. They say all
vaccines carry some risks, but only for a fraction of the population. According
to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for example, serious
allergic reactions that can result in brain damage occur in fewer than one in 1
million children who get the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine and the
measles, mumps and rubella vaccine.
Dr. Bruce
Gellin, executive director of the National Network for Immunization
Information, an organization that promotes vaccination education, said vaccines
today are safer than ever.
"We have
the best system in the world to assure they are as safe as they can absolutely
be," he said. "But no medical product is 100 percent safe."
Gellin points
out that the dangers posed by vaccine-preventable diseases are much higher than
the risks posed by the vaccines. Measles, for example, kills one in 500
children. One in 1,000 will get encephalitis from measles.
Beyond
concerns about safety, many parents believe the relatively new immunizations
against diseases such as chicken pox and hepatitis B are unnecessary for young
children: They survived chicken pox, they figure, so why wouldn't their
children? And they argue that small children are hardly at risk for hepatitis
B, which is spread through sexual contact and injection drug use.
"Parents
want to have choices," Fisher said.
What troubles
disease-prevention experts about the trend is the potential erosion of what is
known as herd immunity, in which immunized kids serve as a protective barrier
for kids who aren't.
Smith calls
it the "free-rider effect," and says herd immunity only works to
prevent outbreaks when enough children are fully immunized. Children who
haven't had their shots are more likely to get sick themselves, and spread
infectious diseases to infants and other children who haven't been immunized.
They also pose a threat to adults and children who have been immunized, but for
whom the vaccines were not 100 percent effective.
In 1998,
Foxfoot said, her daughters contracted pertussis, a potentially dangerous
disease preventable with the DTap (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) vaccine
typically given at 15 months.
The bacterial
disease, which in about 9 percent of cases leads to pneumonia and, more rarely,
seizures and brain disorders, is particularly dangerous to infants. Worldwide,
30,000 people die each year from pertussis, according to the CDC.
The Foxfoot
girls became sick along with several other unimmunized children who live or
attend alternative schools in the scenic hills along the North San Juan Ridge
in the far northwestern corner of the county.
Foxfoot said
that when her daughters became ill, they developed the telltale cough with a
whoop as they tried to catch their breath. She kept the girls at home for
nearly six weeks while they recuperated, as required by law for unimmunized
children with vaccine-preventable diseases. She also isolated them from older
adults -- including her own parents -- and anyone who hadn't been immunized
against the disease.
Foxfoot put her
children on a diet without dairy and wheat products, and made sure they
consumed plenty of clear broth to reduce the mucous that she said exacerbated
the coughing. They recovered fully.
"I was
never worried for their lives," she said. "They were strong and
healthy."
Her children,
whom she educates at home, remain healthy; neither has had an ear infection and
neither has ever seen a primary-care physician, she said.
Feeding the
immunization debate on both sides are numerous Internet sites devised to support
one or the other side.
The Web site
for Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute, for example, provides personal stories
about adverse reactions to vaccines and allows readers to post questions about
immunizations, which are answered by the people who run the site.
The
Immunization Action Coalition site does the opposite, providing horror stories
from parents whose children contracted vaccine-preventable diseases.
Kris
Jessen-Mather is a pediatric nurse practitioner in the Nevada County town of
Grass Valley. Many of her patients are the children of parents who are opposed
to vaccination. It is her practice to listen to their concerns, then try to
convince them of the importance of immunization.
"I just
try and educate them," she said. "But I can't make a parent
immunize."
Not all
parents want to talk about immunization with medical practitioners.
Foxfoot, for
example, said she based her decision on her own research, which included
articles in Mothering magazine, a periodical dedicated to "natural
parenting" and books such as "The Immunization Decision, What Every
Parent Should Know," by a practitioner of homeopathic medicine.
Like others
who do not immunize their children, Foxfoot has come to believe that the immune
systems of infants are not ready to process the increasing number of vaccines
now recommended.
Foxfoot
cannot explain why that would be true, but she is satisfied with her
understanding of the process. Most important, she said, is that she takes her
decision not to immunize seriously, and feels prepared to deal with the medical
consequences.
"If
you're not going to educate yourself, and know the diseases and symptoms and
how to treat them," she said, "maybe you should vaccinate."
Nevada County
health officials are aware of their high exemption rates and have made it a
goal to increase immunization rates by 20 percent by the end of 2004. School
officials say they plan to operate a van to bring shots and vaccination
education to rural communities where the immunization rates are especially low.
Even with
additional support, Christina Garner, the county immunization coordinator,
knows it could be an uphill battle with the parents who refuse to immunize.
"They are very educated on what they believe," she said. "You
cannot for the life of you get them to change their mind.
About the Writer
---------------------------
The Bee's
Dorsey Griffith can be reached at (916) 321-1089 or dgriffith@sacbee.com
.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.