http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/16/national/16MAIL.html
December 16, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]()
Tommy G. Thompson, the secretary of the Department of Health and Human
Services, could make a decision on expanded anthrax vaccinations next week,
officials said after a forum, arranged by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, on what to do next to prevent inhalation anthrax in people who have
already taken antibiotics because of possible exposure.
The Defense Department has agreed to turn over 220,000 doses of vaccine to
the health department and the Food and Drug Administration has given the
disease centers permission to use the vaccine in an experimental treatment
program.
Since early October, more than 32,000 persons have been given initial
courses of antibiotics to counteract possible infections of anthrax from
contaminated mail, officials said. Of these, about 10,000 were advised to
continue taking antibiotics for 60 days because they were most likely to have
been exposed. Five people have died of inhalation anthrax since the outbreak
began.
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
Dr. D. A. Henderson, director of the office of public health preparedness at
Health and Human Services, said candidates for the vaccine would be those with
possible exposure to large amounts of anthrax spores.
"We are concerned with people who may have had a very heavy dose,"
Dr. Henderson said after the meeting. This group, he said, probably numbers
about 3,000.
Once in the body, the spores are believed to germinate into disease- causing
bacteria within 60 days. But because antibiotics kill the bacteria, not the
spores, there are concerns that some spores might remain after the 60-day
treatment and turn deadly, experts said.
Dr. Anthony S. Fauci of the National Institutes of Health said that there
was not yet a consensus among health experts on whether to offer an anthrax
vaccine to civilians because the antibiotics treatment is considered
sufficient. If the vaccine becomes available, patients will have to make their
own decision about taking it, he said.
If the vaccine, which previously has been used only by the military and only
for protection against a future exposure, becomes available for civilians, its
use as a treatment after exposure would be considered experimental and require
special informed consent agreements from the patients, said Dr. Katherine Zoon,
an official at the Food and Drug Administration.
Animal-test data suggests that the vaccine should be given in three doses
over a month's time, while the patients are getting an additional 30- day
course of antibiotics to ward off any potential disease before the vaccine
takes effect, experts said at the meeting.
About 2.1 million anthrax vaccine doses have been administered to 521,000
members of the military with few severe adverse effects, experts said. While
most reactions are mild, including redness, itching and swelling at the
inoculation site, severe allergic reactions have been seen in 1 in 100,000
cases, they said.
Dr. Ivan Walks, health commissioner for the District of Columbia, said any
vaccine program should be accompanied by education and communication programs
directed at various economic and racial groups. He reminded participants that
when antibiotics were recommended early in the crisis, some postal workers
voiced concerns that they were not tested and treated as quickly as workers on
Capitol Hill who were exposed to anthrax from tainted mail in the offices of
senators.
Al Ferranto of the National Association of Letter Carriers also cautioned
the policy makers to consider how any vaccine recommendation might affect
postal workers, who tend to be older than soldiers, with some having diabetes
and other medical problems. He asked health authorities to look at "the
big picture," including how a vaccine program might hurt confidence in the
postal system.
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.