http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7358/0/e
| Home | Help | Search/Archive | Feedback | Table of Contents |
Authors' conclusions in randomised clinical trials were significantly more
favourable towards the experimental intervention when trials were
funded only by for profit organisations. In Kjaergard and Als-Nielsen's
study of trials published in the BMJ (p
249), authors' conclusions were appraised on a six point scale
and compared with financial, personal, academic, or political
competing interests. The association, the authors say, could occur
because for profit organisations, by skill or by chance, fund only
those trials in which the intervention is better than the control, or
it could be due to publication bias.
| Home | Help | Search/Archive | Feedback | Table of Contents |
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.