By John T. Anderson
TIMES RECORD JANDERSON@SWTIMES.COM
Arkansas law regarding immunization of school children is partly
unconstitutional because it requires families to define their
religion, a federal judge ruled Thursday.
However, the child whose family brought the lawsuit against Ozark
schools and state officials still must take the shots in order to
attend schools, U.S. District Judge Robert Dawson ruled.
Danielle McCarthy, 11, was expelled from Ozark schools last year
after her family refused to allow the girl to be vaccinated for
Hepatitis B because of religious reasons. Officials with the state
Department of Health said the girl did not qualify for a religious
exemption because her family did not provide details of its
religious practices and beliefs.
The girls father, Dan McCarthy, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District
Court in Fort Smith, claiming state law that demanded the
vaccinations infringed upon the familys rights. The state
Department of Health, its director Fay Boozman along with certain
employees of the department and the Ozark School District were named
as defendants.
In his order, Dawson stated the religious exemption section of the
law clearly runs afoul of the establishment and free exercise
clauses of the First Amendment and the equal protection clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment because the exemption benefits only those
who are members or adherents of a church or religious denomination
recognized by the state. ... The provision fails ... because its
primary effect is to inhibit the earnest beliefs and practices of
those individuals who oppose immunization on religious grounds but
are not members of an officially recognized religious organization.
The order gives each side something. McCarthy gets the satisfaction
of seeing a portion of state law ruled unconstitutional. The Ozark
school system and the state get confirmation that students must be
immunized before entering school doors.
It has long been settled that individual rights must be
subordinated to the compelling state interest of protecting society
against the spread of disease, Dawson wrote.
Last year, Dawson granted a preliminary injunction in the case,
allowing the girl to return to school without the vaccinations until
the lawsuit was resolved. His latest order dissolves that
injunction.
McCarthy, in his original complaint, stated his belief that the body
is the temple of the Holy Spirit and that God gave his daughter
an immune system that will be violated by the induction of
vaccinations.
McCarthy said he and his wife are not part of an established church
but read the Bible and attended a group that meets weekly called
Hearts of Hope, which he described as a marriage ministry.
Robert Brech, the attorney who represented the Department of Health
in the lawsuit, did not respond to a telephone message on the issue
late Thursday. Greg Karber, the Fort Smith attorney who filed the
lawsuit on McCarthys behalf, also did not respond to a telephone
message left at his office.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"