CNS Poisons*
and CNS Disease Correlate
Through a Long and Complex Curve
*These are the predominant persistent
pesticides.
Polio Secrets
"The lesson to be learned from Swayze's insistence that
infantile paralysis is not a contagious disease is that, nevertheless
according to the law, it is a contagious disease, and that it is illegal
to consider it otherwise."
"Poliomyelitis is unique in that it is the only disease
in the history of medicine in which a theory, and not an established fact
as to its cause, has become incorporated into the public health law."
"Although poliomyelitis is legally a contagious
disease... every attempt has failed conclusively to prove this mandatory
requirement of the public health law... Hoyne points out... the startling
revelation that the etiologic agent of the disease is still unknown..."
"...when this disease was legally made a communicable
disease... funds for poliomyelitis research were from then on designated
for the investigation of the infectious theory only."
Ralph R. Scobey, M.D., "Is The
Public Health Law Responsible For The Poliomyelitis Mystery?" Archives of Pediatrics, Vol 68, p220 (May, 1951)
"In 1907, [during] an epidemic of
poliomyelitis... no infant who was fed exclusively on the breast developed
poliomyelitis."
"Inclusion bodies have been defined as
products of virus activity or the elementary virus bodies themselves.
Inclusion bodies have been found in poisoned humans and experimental
animals."
"No intensive studies have been made... to
determine whether or not the so-called virus of poliomyelitis... simply
results from an exogenous [external] factor or factors..."
"Medical studies have shown repeatedly that
paralytic diseases in... [domestic animals] occur simultaneously in
districts where epidemics of poliomyelitis are prevalent."
"Poliomyelitis investigations... have been
confined exclusively to virus studies."
Ralph R. Scobey, M.D., "The
Poison Cause of Poliomyelitis" Archives of Pediatrics, Vol 69, p172 (April, 1952)
"There is much evidence to indicate that the
poliomyelitis virus is synthesized or activated within the human body
instead of entering it as commonly assumed."
"Carrel (1925) was able to produce tumors resembling
[exactly] Rous' sarcoma and transmissible by cell-free [Berkfeld]
filtrates with indol, arsenic, or tar in chicken embryo. Carrel's
observations have been confirmed by other workers. Fischer (1926), by
treating cultures of normal cells with arsenic obtained on one occasion a
filtrable virus capable of causing tumors."
Ralph R. Scobey, M.D., "Poliomyeltis Caused
by Exogenous Virus?", Science, v71 (1954)
"Harris (1913) was able to inject Berkefeld filtered
tissue material from pellagra victims into monkeys to cause a
corresponding disease in these animals. He concluded from these
experiments that a virus was present in the injected material and that it
was the cause of pellagra. If the work of Harris had been followed
exclusively, various strains of this "virus" might have been discovered
and a vaccine, effective in experimental animals, might have been
developed, as in the case of poliomyelitis. Today, as a
result of unlimited research, however, we know conclusively that pellagra
is not caused by a virus but rather that it is a vitamin deficiency
disease. It is obvious that if the investigations of pellagra had been
restricted to the virus theory, it would still be a mystery."
Ralph R. Scobey, M.D., "The Poison Cause of
Poliomyelitis" Archives of Pediatrics, Vol 69, p172 (April, 1952)
A highly
esteemed poliovirologist characterizes laboratory "proofs" of virus
causality:
"...the highly specialized, neurotropically
fixed virus, which has been maintained in the past by intracerebral
passage in rhesus monkeys, is more likely a laboratory artefact..."
Claus W. Jungeblut, Ph.D.,
Journal of Pediatrics, Vol 37, p109 (July, 1950),
From, Scobey, Archives of Pediatrics (April, 1952)
"...no other portals [aside from
intracerebral injection] could be satisfactorily used to introduce the
challenge inoculum [purified poliovirus solution] because rhesus monkeys,
which have been the chief experimental animals, succumb... not at all when
virus is ingested by mouth."
"In these experiments [,using the more
poliovirus-sensitive chimpanzees], the conventional method of testing for
immunity to poliomyelitis by intracerebral inoculation of virus has not
been attempted. It is likely that such a vigorous challenge of placing
virus in intimate contact with susceptible cells might have broken through
the immunity which was detectable by the more delicate approach [oral
feeding of high quantities of poliovirus] used in our experiments."
Joseph L. Melnick, Dorothy M.
Horstman
"Active Immunity To Poliomyelitis In Chimps" Journal Of Experimental Medicine, 85:217 (1947)
"The experiments of Clark, Frazier, and
Amoss show that after intravenous inoculation in monkeys, the virus
[filtrate] of poliomyelitis disappears from the blood within 72 hours; and
other observations have shown that it is only after enormous intravenous
doses of the virus that the monkey develops the disease. Smaller doses
intravenously fail to produce any disturbance."
"If injected with 250 to 500 cc [1 to 2
cups!] of the virus by a similar route the animal succumbed to the
disease."
George Draper, Acute Poliomyelitis (1917)
1 to 2 cups injected into a 20 lb Rhesus
monkey is equal to 7 to 14 cups injected into a 150 lb man.
"One of the landmarks in the study of
infectious diseases was the development of the Henle-Koch postulates of
causation. They were originally drawn up for bacteria and protozoa, but
were revised in 1937 by Rivers and again in 1982 by Evans in attempts to
accommodate the special problem of proving disease causation by viruses.
The problem is still difficult, especially when viruses are considered as
causative of chronic diseases (including several of the hepatitides),
neoplastic diseases, and slowly progressive neurological diseases. Because
most such diseases cannot be reproduced in experimental animals,
virologists have had to evaluate causation indirectly via 'guilt by
association'..."
Fields Virology, p23 (1996)
Thomas Rivers (also mentioned above) is a
primary player in virology. While experimenting with intramuscular
injections of brain emulsions in 8 monkeys, he unexpectedly found that 2 of
the monkeys acquired neurological disease similar to polio. At this point,
he did not criticize the procedure called "inoculation" but rather, in order
to accommodate this special problem, he wrote:
"...from reports in the literature it
appears that monkeys may suffer from spontaneous demyelinating diseases of
the central nervous system."
Thomas Rivers, et al, Journal of
Experimental Medicine (1953) v58p51
"The orthodox view is that this
[poliovirus] antibody is a result of a process of widespread latent
immunization by subclinical infections with the specific virus. There is
nodirect evidence whatever in favour of
this hypothesis... As far as we are aware, there is no fully substantiated
record in the literature of an individual whose serum at first containing
no poliomyelitis antibody later developed it in adequately measured
amount, and therefore no indication of the nature of the event responsible
for the change... It is concluded that 'poliomyelitus antibody' is
not a result of exposure to or infection by the virus of epidemic
poliomyelitis... [In addition to this study, h]ere we need only refer to
Harmon and Harkins (1936), which showed that of 183 convalescent sera 10%
failed to neutralize the virus. As a control series they quote the results
of examination of 512 `normal` sera... 'These observations ... cast doubt
upon the importance of a single attack of poliomyelitis for the production
of antiviral substance'... Brodie et al (1937 and 1938) cover very much
the same ground... [other studies include...]"
"Various workers have, in fact, shown that
sera from patients recovered from paralytic poliomyelitis may be
completely lacking in neutralizing antibody."
F.M. Burnet and A.V. Jackson
"Poliomyeltis: The Significance Of Neutralizing Antibodies In Human Sera" Journal of Experimental Biology (1939) p261
"It was even known by 1945 that DDT is stored in the
body fat of mammals and appears in the milk. With this foreknowledge the
series of catastrophic events that followed the most intensive campaign of
mass poisoning in known human history, should not have surprised the
experts. Yet, far from admitting a causal relationship [for polio and
other diseases] so obvious that in any other field of biology it would be
instantly accepted, virtually the entire apparatus of communication, lay
and scientific alike, has been devoted to denying, concealing,
suppressing, distorting and attempts to convert into its opposite, the
overwhelming evidence. Libel, slander and economic boycott have not been
overlooked in this campaign."
Morton S. Biskind, M.D., "Public Health
Aspects Of The New Insecticides" American Journal of Digestive Diseases, Vol 20, p330 (1953)
Conformity
...the epidemics grew steadily worse each year, with the
number of new cases climbing from 5,000 in 1933 to 59,000 in 1952.
Salvation came in 1954 with the Salk vaccine..."
"A Paralyzing Fear: The Story of Polio in
America" The New York Times, March 4, 1999 (Film review)
Needless to say, the charge that DDT predisposed to
poliomyelitis was dropped after the disease was controlled through the use
of vaccines. ...such irresponsible claims [that pesticides cause polio and
other diseases] could produce great harm and, if taken seriously, even
interfere with scientific search for true causes and realistic means of
preventing the conditions in question.
Wayland J. Hayes, Jr., Edward R. Laws, Jr. Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, (1991)
Independent Research
This research is presented to foment
discussion that may be needed regarding disease images. It is not presented
as an authoritative and definitive source of information and corrections are
welcome. The reader must be informed that all medical issues should be dealt
with in an appropriate manner by consulting a knowledgeable and qualified
doctor.
My professional background includes both
chemical engineering and the arts. A fascination with the politics of
medicine began early after being exposed to the then prevalent medical
procedures: fluoroscopy, tonsilectomy, and mercury fillings in perfect teeth
as "preventative" dentistry. Experiences like these are considered normal,
and compared to some others, even fortunate.
In 1985, I unintentionally began to suspect
that there was a correlation between the last great polio epidemic and the
last great inundation of DDT. After a few hours of research I was surprised
to find several confirming correlations. Further research impressed a lawyer
and an editor, but they wanted more research and sources.
I wrote to and received encouragement from
the late, great, Dr. Mendelsohn, whose most famous book is The
Confessions Of A Medical Heretic. I received a criticism from the
esteemed Dr. Wootan who was featured on 60 Minutes following the
controversial removal of his medical license. He motivated me to think more
critically of my "discovery." Dr. Wootan has written articles about such
heretical things as the normalcy of fever in illness
(see Mothering Magazine).
His position, incidentally, is not so unusual, as it is recognized by
orthodoxy as a minority view (see Van
Nostrand's Scientific Encyclopedia, "Fever").
Research was shelved as a private revelation
until 1997, when, after the publication of
Duesberg'sInventing the AIDS Virus, historical and biochemical data were
deeply researched, and by 1998, a theory was concluded, that industrial
neurotoxins caused the polio epidemics. Thanks to Peter Duesberg for
revealing virology's more obvious contradictions.
Later, the statistical numbers were found,
enabling the generation of comparative graphs of polio incidence and
pesticide production. The heretical scientific articles from the 1950s were
discovered last.
This research was initially triggered in 1985
by an anti-vaccination pamphlet written by a homeopathist (apologies, no
source). His observations were that vaccinations arrived after the
decline of polio and that polio was a disease going through its natural
epidemic cycle. That critique of orthodoxy, which I didn't entirely agree
with, matured into some light research (1991, Manhattan). I opened
Wesbster's Dictionary, Encyclopedia Britannica, and went to
the NYPL to download a computer listings of periodicals, then a few years
later the textbooks on biochemistry, virology, epidemiology, and toxicolgy.
Much later, rare numeric data was found, herein displayed in the
pesticide-polio graphs, and lastly, I found the heretic orthodox writers,
Biskind, Scobey, et al., a decade of missing history. Thus, truly
independent researchers, half a century apart, with different methodologies
have crossed the same paths, made similar conclusions, and revealed vast
differences between the single public view and the various scientific views.
Raeto West describes his
site: "...the second most intellectual site
on the Internet... to explore aspects of censorship, the manipulation
of history, distortions and corruption in practical matters, for
example science, medicine and the media..."
The intent herein
is to provide an impartial, scholarly analysis of CNS disease and
pesticides. Current research priorities are for a proof of
poliovirus causality and/or a proof that invalidates industrial
causation. Corrections, uncredited sources and/or copyright
infractions, if any, will be rectified upon notice. This site is
not a monologue of truth. It is a catalyst for the reevaluation of
"polio". The reader is urged to confront officials to clarify
issues mentioned herein.
This site
is designed strictly for critical, literary, and academic use. A
qualified, knowledgeable, and ethical medical professional should
be consulted regarding medical issues, treatments, diagnoses, etc.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"