Drugs in the waters
7 August 2002 14:55 EST
by Damaris E. Christensen,
BioMedNet News
A new study suggests that low concentrations of pharmaceuticals
now widely found in the sewage, ground water, surface water, and
even tap water of the United States could have "significant
effects" - especially in combination - "on the critters that live
in the water."
So concludes Colleen Flaherty of the University of Wisconsin,
Madison, who studies daphnia (a kind of zooplankton) in
particular. They "play a key ecological role in freshwater," she
said. "They are eaten by fish and they eat algae."
When Flaherty looked into the possible effects on the daphnia
of common cholesterol-lowering drugs, antibiotics, and
antidepressants, she found that low concentrations of each - about
10 parts per billion - stunted their growth and resulted in more
male offspring in the first brood exposed to the contaminants, a
sign of environmental stress. However, if all of the offspring of
a single daphnia were exposed to these contaminants over their
entire life span, they generally seemed to adapt to the pollution,
Flaherty observed.
The effects of combinations of the drugs, however, were a
different story. Consider, for example, a mixture of clofibric
acid (a metabolite of cholesterol-lowering drugs) at 36 ppb and
fluoxetine (an antidepressant) at 100 ppb. In "a pharmaceutical
cocktail of these two drugs that had almost no effect on their
own," she said, "darn near everything died - up to 90%." Lower
doses led to deformities in about a third of the offspring, she
reported yesterday at the annual meeting of the Ecological Society
of America in Tucson.
"There are definitely synergistic and antagonistic effects,"
Flaherty said. "I hope [these results] will encourage scientists
to do more complex testing to evaluate risk for an organism or an
ecosystem."
"Real world exposure is rarely if ever to a single toxicant,"
said Christian Daughton of the National Exposure Research
Laboratory in Las Vegas, a division of the US Envoronmental
Protection Agency. A recent federal study found at least 82 drugs,
hormones, and other organic compounds polluting national
waterways; among the 139 sites surveyed, the average number of
contaminants per stream was 7.
These pollutants can come from a number of sources. Hormones
and antibiotics from animal feed will appear in the animals'
wastes and can then leach into nearby waterways. Similarly, when
people take drugs, the chemicals' metabolites show up in sewage
systems. If drugs are thrown away, they may dissolve as rainwater
seeps through landfills.
Studies like Flaherty's suggest that the resultant pollutant
combinations could harm aquatic animals and ecosystems, Daughton
said. He cautions, however, that the doses tested by most
researchers, including Flaherty, are higher than those commonly
found in the natural environment. "The question is, what do these
concentrations mean with respect to the real world?" he asked.
"And that answer is still unknown."
Another unknown answer and emerging field of research regards
the effects, if any, of these waterborne contaminants on human
beings. "To say that there will be human consequences [to this
kind of pollution] is jumping the gun," said John Trant of the
University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute in Baltimore. "But
there are a lot of red flags out there."
Picture caption and credit:
Daphnia. Image courtesy Water and Land Resources Division, King
County, Washington

|
Send us your
comments for
publication.
|
| Sign up for BioMedNet News weekly
email alerts. |