http://doctoryourself.com/hoffer_vitc_can.html
|
|
|
|
Vitamin
C vs. Cancer |
|
Cancer & C Book |
|
Review
copyright C 2000 Andrew W. Saul. Vitamin C and Cancer: Discovery,
Recovery, Controversy I first encountered Linus Pauling's
writings in 1973 when I was a student at Australian National
University. In addition to being the author of my organic chemistry
textbook, he had also just visited our university. In the uni refectory
(that's "campus dining hall" for you Yanks), we privately made fun
of Pauling. A physics student and I casually calculated on a serviette
(that's a paper napkin) that you'd have to do nothing but eat oranges all day
if you wanted to consume the amount of vitamin C that Pauling recommended.
Two Nobels or not, we thought he was crazy, and we were not alone our
sophomoric view. Some years later, now back in America and
with two kids in diapers, I was reading all the Pauling papers and books I
could get my hands on: Vitamin C and the Common Cold, How to Live
Longer and Feel Better, Orthomolecular Psychiatry (co-authored
with David Hawkins, MD) And that is how I discovered Abram Hoffer:
Linus Pauling kept referring to Dr. Hoffer's clinical megavitamin research,
which included studies of cancer patients. Life for me has not been the
same since. Cancer may be humanity's most feared
disease, and with reason. Dr. Hoffer effectively removes much of that
fear, replacing it with well-researched, clinically-tested, practical
nutritional advice. And, he provides dozens of documented case histories of
vitamin-taking patients who achieved significantly longer life, and vastly
improved quality of life. I cannot imagine a more important and
uplifting book for the family of a cancer patient than Vitamin C and
Cancer. Not everyone agrees with this. Certain politically powerful medical
authorities have openly discouraged cancer patients from taking large doses
of vitamin C. It is unethical for any doctor to deny therapy that might
be of value to her patient. Still, the number of cancer patients who have
ever had their doctor recommend a therapeutic trial of large quantities of
vitamin C remains small. I predict that there will eventually be a
class-action lawsuit brought against orthodox medicine by patients who were
wrongly kept from supportive high-dose vitamin therapy. The grounds for disparaging vitamin C
usually center on three inaccurate claims: 1) vitamin C is ineffective
against cancer; 2) vitamin C interferes with conventional cancer therapies;
and 3) vitamin C is in itself harmful to the cancer patient. Hoffer refutes each of these fallacious
views with the authority of 50 years of medical research and medical practice
behind him. So let's let him set the record straight:
2) Vitamin C reduces the side-effects of
chemotherapy, surgery and radiation therapy. Patients on a strong
nutritional program have far less nausea, and often experience little or no
hair loss during chemo. They experience reduced pain and swelling following
radiation. They have faster, uncomplicated healing after surgery.
Such vitamin-mediated benefits mean that oncologists can give vitamin-taking
patients the full dose of chemotherapy, rather than having to cut the dose to
keep the patient from giving up entirely. Obviously, full-strength
chemo is more likely to be effective against cancer than reduced-strength
chemo. A similar benefit is at work with radiation therapy: the full
intensity of treatment is far better tolerated by an optimally-nourished
patient. With surgery, the risk reduction aspects of vitamins, both
pre- and post-op, are well established. Therefore, vitamin C, far from being
detrimental, makes a most positive contribution to the conventional treatment
of cancer. 3) Even at very high doses, Vitamin C is
an unusually safe substance; countless studies have verified this. As an
antioxidant, collagen-building co-enzyme, and reinforcer of the immune
system, vitamin C is vital to a cancer patient. Yet the blood work of cancer
patients will invariably show that they have abnormally low levels of the
vitamin. What is dangerous is vitamin deficiency. Fortunately there are physicians like Dr.
Hoffer who still look to the patient, and not the test tube, for their
answers. A patient's therapeutic response is the highest of all guiding
principles in medicine. If it works, do it. If it seems to work,
do it. If it does no harm, do it. Remember: If there were a sure
cure for cancer, you would have heard about it. There isn't. But
this just makes it all the more important for patients to demand adjunctive
vitamin therapy from their physicians. The number of
conventionally-educated, hospital trained doctors that support vitamin C
therapy is growing. Hoffer was among the first. Your oncologist
could be next. Let her read your copy of Vitamin C and Cancer.
|
|
|
AN IMPORTANT NOTE:
This page is not in any way offered as prescription, diagnosis nor treatment
for any disease, illness, infirmity or physical condition. Any form of
self-treatment or alternative health program necessarily must involve an individual's
acceptance of some risk, and no one should assume otherwise. Persons
needing medical care should obtain it from a physician. Consult your
doctor before making any health decision. Neither the author nor the webmaster has
authorized the use of their names or the use of any material contained within
in connection with the sale, promotion or advertising of any product or
apparatus. Single-copy reproduction for individual, non-commercial use is
permitted providing no alterations of content are made, and credit is given.
|
|
|
|
|
| Home | Order my Books | About the Author | Contact Us | Webmaster | |
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.