http://www.lsjxtra.com/news/010824_bioport_1A-6A.html

 

Friday, August 24, 2001

Pentagon assessing BioPort

Review of contract with Lansing firm started this month

 

BioPort facts

Location: Lansing

Employees: 220

Main product: Anthrax vaccine, used to protect

U.S. troops against deadly biological weapon

History: Former state of Michigan lab. Bought

by private group in 1998.

By Tim Martin
Lansing State Journal

The Pentagon is reviewing its contract with Lansing's BioPort Corp., sole provider of the military's troubled anthrax vaccine.

The military has pumped $126 million into BioPort, but production problems at the company have all but stalled the program aimed at protecting troops against a deadly biological weapon possessed by Iraq and several other potential enemies.

The review - started last week - comes as new Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld examines a wide variety of Pentagon programs to determine if they're worth the money. A report on the BioPort contract is due in early September.

Ending the contract could cripple BioPort, which has 220 employees in north Lansing devoted almost entirely to the vaccination program. The company had been working toward restarting vaccinations in late 2002, but the review could put those plans - and the program's future - in jeopardy.

"All facets of the biological weapons defense program are under constant review and scrutiny,'' Pentagon spokesman Jim Turner said. "Due to the failure of BioPort to produce the vaccine, this contract review has been directed and will continue.''

The Pentagon plans to continue its anthrax vaccination program, Turner said. But the program now includes only troops at highest risk for an anthrax attack because vaccine supplies are critically low.

The Pentagon has some strong supporters of the anthrax vaccination program, made mandatory for the nation's 2.4 million troops in 1998 under former President Bill Clinton. But Rumsfeld and other newcomers appointed to the Pentagon this year by George W. Bush are giving several programs a fresh look.

"This review is not uncommon or unexpected,'' BioPort spoleswoman Kim Brennen Root said. "We understand, with any new administration, programs would be reviewed.''

BioPort and military officials have said the program is needed to protect troops against anthrax, which the Pentagon has said is the top biological weapon threat facing the U.S.

But the program has come under fire in Congress and among troops for safety and financial concerns.

At least 400 military personnel have faced disciplinary action rather than take the vaccine. But military and Food and Drug Administration records indicate adverse reaction rates to the anthrax vaccine aren't much different than to vaccines in general.

Even some of the program's staunchest critics don't think the Pentagon will pull the plug on BioPort.

"So much money has been dumped into BioPort, I doubt they would yank the contract now,'' said Lansing's Randi Allaire, a former member of the Air National Guard.

But the money, coupled with lack of production, could trouble Pentagon auditors. Less than 20 percent of U.S. troops have received any of the six-shot anthrax series because BioPort has been unable to win government approval to sell the vaccine.

"How much longer are we going to permit the taxpayers of America to pay a company for a product it can't produce?'' said Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C. "I hope the Department of Defense makes a good business decision and voids the contract.''

BioPort finished renovating its north Lansing labs in 1999, but so far does not have FDA approval to sell vaccine made there. BioPort expects to get that OK by October, which could lead to approved vaccine in 2002.

"We have every intention of getting the approval and meeting our Department of Defense obligations,'' Brennen Root said. "The scrutiny this program and this company the past few years have been intense. "We've lived through this before. It works to cement the resolve of the people who work here.''

The Pentagon has studied options for a second source of the vaccine in case BioPort fails. But experts say it could take five years for another lab to get set up and approved to make the drug.

Contact Tim Martin at 377-1061 or tmartin@lsj.com.

What do you think? Visit our message board.
Click here.

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.