“No amount of evidence can persuade anyone who is not
listening.” Abram Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D.
The DOCTOR YOURSELF (SM) NEWSLETTER Vol 1, No 22 September
10, 2001 “Free of charge, free of advertising, and free of the A.M.A.”
Written and published by Andrew Saul, PhD. of http://www.doctoryourself.com
, a free online library of more than 250 natural healing articles with over
3,500 scientific references.
A riddle: how many years does it take for a truly new way
of treating disease to be generally accepted? The answer is forty, according to
Abram Hoffer, M.D, Ph.D. There are few physicians who have sufficient
experience to personally validate such a claim, but Dr. Hoffer can. He
pioneered megavitamin research and treatment back in the early 1950’s, and,
half a century later, he has still been largely ignored by the medical
profession. Why? Because Dr. Hoffer
treats with vitamins. And, he gets results.
Dr. Hoffer, now a lively 84 years of age, still maintains
an active practice on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. He has written 20
books and over 500 scientific articles that contain more than enough
information to set the medical profession on its ear. His work forms the most
elegant explanation of orthomolecular (megavitamin) medicine since Dr. Linus
Pauling’s historic 1968 paper in Science. In fact, Hoffer had a 17-year jump on
Pauling; vitamin B-3 (niacin, or niacinamide) to treat behavioral disorders was
first used by Hoffer and colleague Dr. Humphry Osmond in 1951. Happy Fiftieth Anniversary!
Why on earth should acceptance take so long ? After all,
if megavitamin treatment is so good, how come your doctor doesn’t use it? How
come it is not on the news? The answer may have more to do with medical
politics than with medical science. Consider Hoffer’s views on Attention
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: “The DSM system (the standard of the American Psychiatric
Association) has little or no relevance to diagnosis. It has no relevance to
treatment, either, because no matter which terms are used to classify these
children, they are all recommended for treatment with drug therapy” combined,
sometimes, with other non-megavitamin approaches. “If the entire diagnostic
scheme were scrapped today, it would make almost no difference to the way these
children were treated, or to the outcome of treatment. Nor would their patients
feel any better or worse” (Dr. Hoffer’s ABC of Natural Nutrition for Children).
Statements like these do not exactly endear one to the medical community.
And, as if such critical statements are not enough, Dr.
Hoffer then writes book after book setting out genuine nutritional alternatives
to drug therapy. He provides vitamin dosage details, food tables, references,
and many, many case histories, numerous research summaries, precise recommendations
for optimum diet, comparisons of drugs and vitamins, discussions of food
additives, behavioral self-tests, and, most importantly, a wealth of
professional experience.
The best part of Dr. Hoffer’s writing is that it offers
practical, positive advice. Criticisms and even lawsuits over the hazards of
pharmaceuticals are on the rise, but neither court nor controversy can cure. “Saying
no to drugs” also requires saying “yes” to something else. That something else
is nutrition, properly employed.
For those who say there is insufficient scientific
evidence to support megavitamin therapy, perhaps they haven’t been looking hard
enough. Hoffer and his colleagues were first to employ vitamin C as an
antioxidant, use the B-vitamins against heart disease, and prescribe niacin to
treat behavioral disorders.
Half a century ago.
The United States Patent Office delayed issuing a patent
on the Wright brothers’ airplane for five years because it broke accepted
scientific principles. This is actually true. And so is this: Vitamin B-3,
niacin, is scientifically proven to be effective against psychosis, and yet the
medical profession has delayed endorsing it. Not for five years, but for nearly
fifty.
This may be a puzzler, but isn’t the bottom line. This is:
The simple way to determine whether vitamins will help is to try them. We are all
fortunate to have available to us invaluable guidance from the foremost
authority on the subject.
In 1951, Abram Hoffer had just completed his psychiatry
residency. What’s more, he had proven, with the very first double-blind,
placebo-controlled studies in the history of psychiatry, that vitamin B-3 could
cure schizophrenia. You would think that psychiatrists everywhere would have beaten
down a path to Saskatchewan to replicate his findings.
You’d think so.
In modern psychiatry, niacin and schizophrenia are both
terms that have been closeted away out of sight. And patients, tranquilized
into submission or Prozac-ed into La-La Land, are often idly at home or
wandering the streets, where either way it is highly doubtful that they will
get much in the way of a daily vitamin intake. Those in institutions fare
little better nutritionally. For everyone “knows” that vitamins do not cure “real”
diseases.
But Dr. Hoffer dissents. For half a century Dr. Hoffer has
dissented. His central point has been this: Illness, including mental illness,
is not caused by drug deficiency. But much illness, especially mental illness,
may be seen to be caused by a vitamin deficiency. This makes sense, and has stood
up to clinical trial again and again. If you do not believe this, Dr. Hoffer’s book Vitamin B-3 and Schizophrenia
will provide you with the references to prove it.
We’ve all been carefully taught that drugs cure illness,
not diet. And certainly not vitamin
supplements!
But the truth will out eventually, and nothing succeeds
like success. Ask the patients who have
recovered, like Jim.
Jim had been totally unmanageable. At 21, he’d already
been kicked out of the State Hospital for being too violent. So they sent him home to his parents, whom
he threatened on a daily basis while punching holes in the living room walls.
Jim slept one hour per night, and roamed the streets for the other seven. His
face was scaly and severely broken out with acne. His dietary and digestive
habits were appalling, and he appeared to be, to quote Far Side cartoonist Gary
Larson, just plain nuts.
So there they were, three feet away from me: a psycho with
two terrified parents. Medical science had not helped him, and had, ironically,
discharged him in the face of its own impotence. So I told the family about Dr. Hoffer’s approach: take very large
quantities of niacin, starting at three thousand milligrams, plus an equal or
larger amount of vitamin C.
Advanced niacin deficiency, or pellagra, actually causes
psychosis, as well as the skin and gastrointestinal problems that Jim was
experiencing. He needed more niacin than the average person, and probably a lot
more. At really large doses, niacin has a profound calming, sedating effect.
Yet it is not a drug, but a nutrient. The safety margin is huge. Dr. Hoffer has
prescribed as much as 20,000 milligrams a day. Therefore 3,000 milligrams is actually
not a particularly high dose.
About two weeks later, Jim’s father called. “Let me tell
you what happened,” he began. “You know Jim only sleeps maybe an hour a night?
Well, the first night on the niacin, he slept 18 hours. He’s been sleeping
about 7 hours a night since.”
“That’s terrific,” I said.
“That’s not all,” he said. “Last Friday morning, for the
first time in I don’t know how many years, Jim came down for breakfast. He
walked into the dining room and said ‘Good morning, Dad.’”
Even on the phone I could hear the tears in the man’s
voice. It was wonderful.
And niacin is cheap, non-prescription and easy to monitor:
if you flush, you took too much. Still sick, you took too little. No flush and
no psychosis means you did it right.
Odd, really, that with a medical mood favoring medication
over analysis, that Abram Hoffer’s niacin protocol is so unappreciated. After
all, why NOT use vitamins? They are far
safer than pharmaceuticals. Yet a
fundamental bias in both medicine and dietetics rises darkly from the swamp
when you even hint of a therapeutic validity for megavitamin doses. Why such resistance
to such a useful nutritional tool? Is it perhaps because niacin therapy is
really, really cheap? Or is it because
it is hard to see psychotic behavior as a nutritional deficiency?
“Pellagra” is the classic niacin deficiency disease. It
was once common in the rural South where the poor had little else to eat except
tryptophan-poor foods like milled corn. The symptoms are the “Three D’s”: diarrhea,
dermatitis, and dementia. More specific pellagra symptoms include weakness, anorexia,
lassitude, indigestion, skin eruptions, skin scaling, neuritis, nervous system
destruction, confusion, apathy, disorientation, and insanity. Does this sound a bit like schizophrenia to
you?
But the success, convenience and relentless advertising of
new so-called “wonder drugs” diminished niacin’s popularity. Then, the American
Psychiatric Association unscientifically trashed megavitamin therapy in 1973.
So now we have growing legions of nutritionally challenged, mentally-malnourished
Americans who don’t know, or care, that they are malnourished. For they are
happily (and legally, and profitably) drugged into a mood-altered wonder land,
aptly termed a “pharmacological lobotomy” by fully-recovered former Dr. Hoffer
patient Margot Kidder. (She’ll tell you her story herself at http://www.margotkidder.com ) It is disquieting to see an arsenal of “Mother’s
Little Helper” psychotropic pharmaceuticals are used by millions daily, even
while so many doctors and dieticians condemn megavitamin therapeutics out of
hand.
The many negative side effects and dangers of these drugs
are now restoring interest in niacin. Even trendy “somas du jour,” such as
Paxil and Prozac, have serious failings. A quick read in the Physicians’ Desk
Reference (or “PDR.,” available at any library) will illustrate this.
Psychosis is not caused by drug deficiency, but rather by
a functional nutritional deficiency. There is a chemical found in quantity in
the bodies of schizophrenic persons. It is an indole called adrenochrome.
Adrenochrome (which is oxidized adrenalin) has an almost mescaline-like effect
on the body. That might well explain their behavior. Niacin serves to reduce
the body’s production of this toxic material. It takes a lot of niacin to do
the job.
Dr. Hoffer says: “Dr. Humprhry Osmond, John Smythies and I
originated the adrenochrome hypothesis in 1954. We are delighted that (after
some 45 years) this hypothesis which has been so fruitful in directing
research, which was one of the roots of orthomolecular medicine, is at last
receiving serious examination in the establishment literature. It is likely
that over the next decade there will be a major explosion of interest into
adrenochrome and similar oxidized derivatives of the catechol amines.”
Niacin toxicity does exist, but is rare. Dr. Hoffer found
that even 40,000 mg daily is not toxic but estimated that over 200,000 mg/day
is fatal. The most psychotic person you are ever likely to meet could probably
not hold more than 10,000 mg/day, and most of us would never exceed 1,000 mg
daily. Medical physicians frequently
give patients 2,000 to 5,000 milligrams of niacin to lower serum cholesterol.
The safety margin is large. There is not even one death from niacin per year.
Check CDC or Poison Control Center statistics, the Merck Manual, and the PDR
and see. Side effects of niacin therapy include flushing, skin itching, and,
upon large overdose, nausea. Such
symptoms vary with dose, the body’s need, and volume of food, water, or soluble
fiber consumed.
“Negative side effects are easily dealt with by physicians
who know niacin,” Dr. Hoffer told me. “In most cases they are minor irritants.
Some of the side effects may be minimized with vitamin C. The positive side
effects, such as increased general health, improved healing, and prolongation
of high quality life, are all benefits. In sharp contrast, very few drugs have positive
side effects.”
So it is a lack of niacin that is the real public health
problem. The US RDA is only about 20 mg, and bodily need for niacin varies with
activity, body size and illness, according to Williams, Nutrition and Diet
Therapy (6th ed, p 239). About half of all Americans will not get
even that much from their diets. Niacin’s special importance is indicated in
that the US RDA for niacin is twenty or more times higher than the RDA for
other B-vitamins, and that’s just for everyday, healthy people.
Dr. Hoffer’s clinical megavitamin research has included
work with over one thousand cancer patients. Those taking large quantities of
vitamins achieved significantly longer life, and vastly improved quality of
life. I cannot imagine a more important and uplifting news for the family of a
cancer patient.
Not everyone agrees with this.
Certain politically powerful medical authorities have
openly discouraged cancer patients from taking large doses of vitamin C. It is
unethical for any doctor to deny therapy that might be of value to her patient.
Still, the number of cancer patients who have ever had their doctor recommend a
therapeutic trial of large quantities of vitamin C remains small. I predict that
there will eventually be a class-action lawsuit brought against orthodox
medicine by patients who were wrongly kept from supportive high-dose vitamin
therapy.
The grounds for disparaging vitamin C usually center on
three inaccurate claims: 1) vitamin C is ineffective against cancer; 2) vitamin
C interferes with conventional cancer therapies; and 3) vitamin C is in itself
harmful to the cancer patient.
Hoffer refutes each of these fallacious views with the
authority of 50 years of medical research and medical practice behind him. So let’s let him set the record straight:
1) There are many
controlled studies that demonstrate that vitamin C is indeed effective against
cancer. These studies are discussed in Hoffer’s book Vitamin C and Cancer. Some
of the most interesting studies were done in Japan, using over 30,000 mg of
vitamin C a day. Extensive clinical reports from orthomolecular (megavitamin)
physicians, such as Robert F. Cathcart
III, MD
( http://www.orthomed.com ), indicate that
higher quantities of vitamin C are even more effective.
2) Vitamin C reduces
the side-effects of chemotherapy, surgery and radiation therapy. Patients on a
strong nutritional program have far less nausea, and often experience little or
no hair loss during chemo. They experience reduced pain and swelling following
radiation. They have faster, uncomplicated healing after surgery. Such
vitamin-mediated benefits mean that oncologists can give vitamin-taking patients
the full dose of chemotherapy, rather than having to cut the dose to keep the
patient from giving up entirely. Obviously, full-strength chemo is more likely
to be effective against cancer than reduced-strength chemo. A similar benefit
is at work with radiation therapy: the full intensity of treatment is far better
tolerated by an optimally-nourished patient. With surgery, the risk reduction
aspects of vitamins, both pre- and post-op, are well established. Therefore, vitamin C, far from being
detrimental, makes a most positive contribution to the conventional treatment
of cancer.
3) Even at very high
doses, Vitamin C is an unusually safe substance; countless studies have
verified this. As an antioxidant, collagen-building co-enzyme, and reinforcer
of the immune system, vitamin C is vital to a cancer patient. Yet the blood
work of cancer patients will invariably show that they have abnormally low
levels of the vitamin. What is dangerous is vitamin deficiency.
Fortunately there are physicians like Dr. Hoffer who
still look to the patient, and not the test tube, for their answers. A patient’s
therapeutic response is the highest of all guiding principles in medicine. If
it works, do it. If it seems to work, do it. If it does no harm, do it.
Remember: If there were a sure cure for cancer, you would have heard about it.
There isn’t. But this just makes it all the more important for patients to
demand adjunctive vitamin therapy from their physicians. The number of conventionally-educated,
hospital trained doctors that support vitamin C therapy is growing. Hoffer was
among the first. Your family doctor could be next.
But rather than wait, I would go so far as to advise
reading everything Dr.
Hoffer has ever written. The following would be a great start:
Vitamin B-3 and Schizophrenia: Discovery, Recovery,
Controversy by Abram Hoffer, MD (1998) Quarry Press, Kingston, Ontario Canada
ISBN 1-55082-079-6 Softcover, 150 pages plus bibliography and two appendices.
Vitamin C and Cancer: Discovery, Recovery, Controversy
by Abram Hoffer, MD, PhD, with Linus Pauling (1999) Quarry
Press, Kingston,
Ontario ISBN
1-55082-078-8 Softcover, 180 pp plus
bibliography and 74 pp
of appendices
Dr. Hoffer’s ABC of Natural Nutrition for Children by
Abram Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D (1999) Quarry Press, Kingston, Ontario ISBN 1-55082-185-7
(Softcover, 280 pages plus tables and bibliography)
Abram Hoffer’s complete nutrition bibliography of books and
journal articles
is posted at
http://www.doctoryourself.com/biblio_hoffer.html
http://www.islandnet.com/~hoffer/ is Dr. Hoffer’s cancer information home page.
http://www.islandnet.com/~hoffer/hofferhp.htm
is Dr. Hoffer’s schizophrenia information home page.
http://www.orthomed.org has information and posted articles
from the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, of which Dr. Hoffer is
editor-in-chief.
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_paradigm.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_future.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_cancer_2.html
http://doctoryourself.com/chemo.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_anecdote.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_editorial.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_JOM.html
http://doctoryourself.com/hoffer_krypto.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_psychosis.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/CSF_endowment.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_factoids.html
http://doctoryourself.com/hoffer_shute.html
and reviews of his books at
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_ABC.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_vitc_can.html
http://www.doctoryourself.com/review_hoffer_B3.html
John Hammell ( jham@iahf.com ) at IAHF writes: “Please
call your Senators and ask them to cosponsor S 1330 IS, the Dietary Supplement
Tax Fairness Act of 2001. This bill was introduced by Senators Hatch and Harkin
on August 2, and would provide for the IRS to allow tax exempt status for any
dietary supplements that you buy so you can write them off just like
medications. Please therefor call your
Senators today via the Capital Switchboard at 202-225-3121 and if you aren’t
sure of the name of your Senators give them your zip code and they can look
them up. All you have to say to the person who answers is that you are a
constituent and that you would like for the Senator to Cosponsor S 1330 IS:
Dietary Supplement Tax Fairness Act of 2001 because you would like to write off
all expenses for vitamins.
More from John Hammell: “Also, please call your
Congressman and ask him to cosponsor Foods Are Not Drugs Act of 2001 HR 2265
IH. It only has four cosponsors to date and the bill needs many, many more to
pass.
“Please help! Contact your Congressman via that same
Capital Switchboard number (202-225-3121). Tell them you want him or her to
cosponsor HR 2265 IH, The Foods are Not Drugs Act, because present law allows
the FDA far too much leeway to ban safe products through restrictive United
Nations CODEX Vitamin Standards currently under development.”
(Editor’s Note: For easy letter-writing hints and email
links to the Senate, please look at http://www.doctoryourself.com/write_now.html More information on CODEX is p osted in the
Doctor Yourself NEWSLETTER Vol 1, #4 Dec. 22, 2000, which you can read at http://www.doctoryourself.com/backissues.html . You will
also want to check http://www.iahf.com
for greatly expanded coverage of this important subject.)
“Are those beaks coming up in my garden?” Or: Why Chicken is
in the “Meat”
Group
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Chemo, Radiation, Vitamins
Why Rice is Nice
Doctors’ Strikes: No Worries
Privacy Statement:
We do not sell, and we do not share, our mailing list or
your email address with anyone. You may notice that there is no advertising at http://doctoryourself.com
and no advertising in this newsletter. We have no financial connection with the
supplement industry. We do not sell vitamins or other health products, except
for Dr. Saul’s books, which help fund these free public services.
FREE SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR ALL to this newsletter available at
http://www.doctoryourself.com/newsmail.html
Ideas? To submit a question or suggest a topic for the
newsletter, email me
AN IMPORTANT NOTE: This newsletter is not in any way
offered as prescription, diagnosis nor treatment for any disease, illness,
infirmity or physical condition. Any form of self-treatment or alternative
health program necessarily must involve an individual’s acceptance of some
risk, and no one should assume otherwise. Persons needing medical care should
obtain it from a physician. Consult your doctor before making any health
decision.
“DOCTOR YOURSELF” “DoctorYourself.com” and “Doctor
Yourself Newsletter” are service marks
of Andrew W. Saul. All rights reserved.
Copyright c 2001 and prior years Andrew W. Saul drsaul@doctoryourself.com
Permission to reproduce single copies of this newsletter FOR
NON-COMMERCIAL,
PERSONAL USE ONLY is hereby granted providing no alteration
of content is
made and authorship credit is given. Additional single
copies will be sent
by postal mail to a practitioner or patient, free of charge,
upon receipt of
a self addressed, stamped envelope only, to Number 8 Van
Buren Street,
Holley, NY 14470 USA Telephone (716) 638-5357
NetZero Platinum
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97
Newsletter mailing list
http://doctoryourself.com/mailman/listinfo/newsletter_doctoryourself.com
ALL
INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR
GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE
KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED
AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO
VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU
ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.