he
patient is 60, and she has been happily taking estrogen for 20 years, ever
since her uterus and ovaries were removed. Now, she would like to stop. But
when she tries, she is miserable. Hot flashes leave her drenched in sweat,
sometimes as often as every half hour, and she seems to be getting more
uncomfortable every day.
Much as she wants to get off the hormone, she tells her doctor, "Right
now, I'm ready to just scream and say, `Oh, please, just put me back on it.'
"
Frequent hot flashes can be debilitating; if they play havoc with sleep,
fatigue can then lead to depression and forgetfulness. There is no better
treatment for hot flashes than estrogen, most doctors agree. Why, then, does
this woman want to quit?
According to an article last week in The Journal of the American Medical
Association, the patient, Mrs. W., is concerned about the possible risks of
long-term hormone therapy. Her biggest fear is breast cancer, because her
sister and grandmother have had the disease and she herself has had several
breast cysts. Although there is no evidence of an increased breast cancer
risk for women who use hormones for less than five years, studies suggest
that taking them longer is associated with a 30 to 60 percent increase in
risk.
For women like Mrs. W., who have had their uteruses removed, hormone
replacement therapy consists of estrogen alone. But for other women,
estrogen alone can cause uterine cancer, and so the estrogen is given along
with another hormone, progestin.
Breast cancer is not the only concern for women taking either type of
hormone therapy. The article in the medical journal, by Dr. Deborah Grady, a
professor of epidemiology and medicine at the University of California in
San Francisco, describes several other side effects, including relatively
minor ones like uterine bleeding and breast soreness, and more serious
problems like a tripling of the risk of blood clots and a 40 percent
increase in the risk of gallbladder disease, which affects 1 in 10
Americans; the risk increases with age, and in women is twice as great as in
men.
Blood clots are far less common, though; over all, they occur in only 1
to 2 women in 10,000 who do not use hormone therapy, so a tripling of the
risk does not result in a huge number. But the risks are higher in women who
already have coronary artery disease. Estrogen increases the risk by
stimulating the liver to produce more of the substances that it normally
makes to promote clotting.
Estrogen's risks have long been recognized, but until recently many
doctors and patients assumed the risks were outweighed by benefits, which
were thought to include a decreased risk of heart attacks, strokes, broken
bones, urinary incontinence, severe depression and Alzheimer's disease.
But rigorous studies in recent years have cast doubt on some of the
benefits that many women and their doctors took for granted. Most of the
data comes from studies involving the type of estrogen in the drug Premarin,
the most widely used brand of hormone replacement in the United States. The
hormone, conjugated equine estrogen, is extracted from the urine of pregnant
horses.
An international panel of experts who evaluated hormone therapy released
part of a position paper last month stating that clinical trials had found
no evidence that estrogen could treat or prevent urinary incontinence, major
depression or memory loss in Alzheimer's disease. It is still being studied
in Alzheimer's, however, the paper noted. And the paper added that although
estrogen clearly prevents bone loss, whether that translates into preventing
fractures has not been studied in a large controlled trial. For treating
osteoporosis and preventing fractures, there is stronger evidence for other
drugs: raloxifene and a class of drugs called bisphosphonates, which
includes Fosamax.
As for cardiovascular disease, three studies have suggested that rather
than protecting women from heart attacks and strokes, hormone therapy may
increase their risk in the first few years. Women with heart disease or risk
factors for it, like high blood pressure or high cholesterol, are now
advised not to depend on estrogen but to take drugs meant specifically to
lower blood pressure and cholesterol.
But one of the studies that found signs of a heart risk, the Women's
Health Initiative, a clinical trial involving more than 27,000 women, is
still under way and is expected to provide more information about
cardiovascular disease and hormones in 2006.
"We haven't had the last word on this," said Dr. Nanette Wenger, chief of
cardiology at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta and an editor of the
International Position Paper on Women's Health and Menopause, to be issued
in June by the National Institutes of Health and the private Giovanni
Lorenzini Medical Science Foundation of Italy.
But women want advice now. Many doctors say that given hormone therapy's
known risks and the dearth of evidence for life-saving benefits, they can
recommend it only to women who have severe symptoms like hot flashes and
vaginal dryness, or low bone density and who do not have known risk
factors like a history of heart disease, strokes or blood clots. And then,
doctors say, the best course may be to use the hormones for a few years at
the height of their symptoms, and taper off gradually.
"For some women, symptoms disrupt their professional lives and their sex
lives, and that's important," Dr. Grady said. "Hormone treatment is
reasonable therapy. But you don't have to take it for the rest of your born
days."
Estrogen therapy has been in use for about 50 years, and the pendulum has
swung back and forth several times. In the late 1960's and early 70's, it
was regarded as the fountain of youth. Then it was accused of causing
uterine cancer, and rehabilitated when it was found that adding progesterone
could cut the cancer risk. In the 80's and early 90's, studies of women who
chose to take hormone replacement suggested that it could prevent heart
disease. But the increased risk of breast cancer also became apparent, and
more recent studies have failed to confirm any cardiovascular benefit.
Dr. Isaac Schiff, the chief of obstetrics and gynecology at Massachusetts
General Hospital, said: "There is controversy, and there are good people
with great intentions on both sides of the fence. What is sad is, here's a
drug that's been around for so many years, and we know so relatively little
about it. It was used and introduced without really being studied in a
rigorous scientific way. We're learning as we go along. We really suffer
from a lack of information, a lack of good science."
Like Dr. Grady, Dr. Schiff said the strongest reason for using hormone
replacement was to treat symptoms that a woman finds intolerable. Hot
flashes often diminish after three to six months and go away entirely after
a few years. But in some women they persist longer.
Dr. Schiff said he had done a study in which temperature probes placed on
women's faces found that their skin temperature rose 2 to 3 degrees
Fahrenheit, and occasionally even 5 degrees, during hot flashes.
He said one of his patients was the first female leader in her
profession. "At every meeting she was the only woman," Dr. Schiff said. "She
chaired meetings with men, and when she would get hot flashes, they saw it
as blushing or a sign of weakness. She said: `I can't afford that. I'm
taking estrogen till I retire.' "
But what, then, is a woman like Mrs. W. to do, when she tries to give up
estrogen and finds that she feels miserable?
Dr. Grady suggested a more gradual tapering of the dose than Mrs. W. had
tried, perhaps reducing the dose one day a week and then proceeding slowly.
"The worst thing you can do is stop cold turkey," Dr. Schiff said.
Most women are able to taper off. In fact, most women do so on their own.
"Out of every 100 who start, after a couple of years only 20 are still
taking it," Dr. Schiff said.
But he and Dr. Grady say there are some women who seem to feel simply
awful without estrogen, and for them the relief may well outweigh the risks.
Some get help from other nonhormonal drugs, though none work as well as
estrogen. Some women try soy protein and herbal products, but Dr. Grady said
there was not evidence from controlled trials to recommend them.