|
Smallpox vaccination campaign draws contention
Jane Asher
LIFE Staff Writer
April 03, 2002
Public mass vaccination campaigns may infringe on
human rights in the near future.
Since Sept. 11, threats of biological warfare have been made against U.S.
citizens, and the Centers for Disease Control is taking immediate action.
The CDC gave $1 million to the Center for Civilian Biodefense Studies at
John Hopkins University in Maryland and the Georgetown University Center for
Law and the Public Health to develop a coordinated mass vaccination response
in case of a smallpox emergency.
It is important to have a plan in case of emergency, but their plan is a
little harsh, said Barbara Fisher, co-founder and president of the National
Vaccine Information Center.
The proposed model state legislation would allow public health officials
to mobilize and use all or any part of the organized militia to isolate,
quarantine and force vaccination and medical treatment on American citizens
in states where the governor has called a state of emergency for 30 days or
more, according to www.publichealthlaw.net.
Public health officials would be given the right to seize private
property such as communications devices, carriers, real estate, fuels,
food, clothing and health care facilities and take control of the use,
sale, dispensing, distribution and transportation of food, fuel, clothing
and other commodities, alcoholic beverages, firearms, explosives and
combustibles.
If passed by the states, the law would give unprecedented police powers
to public health officials and those they designate to charge citizens with
misdemeanors and imprison them if they refuse to comply with vaccination,
medical treatment or isolation orders without being able to go to court
first. Those who participate in enforcing the law would not be held liable
for any injury, death or loss of property which resulted, Fisher said.
The National Vaccine Information Center is trying to stress the fact that
this law should only be passed if amended, Fisher said.
If citizens object for religious, health or consciences beliefs, they
can object and stay in their own houses, she said.
Fisher said it is vital to have enough vaccine and drugs available to
those who want it in case of an emergency, but citizens must still have the
legal right to inform consent.
In doing this research, Ive discovered a lot about the smallpox
vaccine. Its the most reactive vaccine weve ever used. The effects of the
vaccination are worse than we realize, Fisher said.
When Fisher did research for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of
1986, she discovered that often doctors cannot predict ahead of time which
individuals will react to vaccines and die or be left with mental
retardation, medication-resistant seizure disorders, paralysis, learning
disabilities, Attention Deficit Disorder, autism, chronic arthritis or other
immune and brain dysfunctions.
Certainly, America should have a sound, workable emergency plan in place
in the event of a bioterrorism attack, but not one that places the life and
liberty of the majority of citizens in the hands of an elite few, who will
have the power to take both from citizens without their consent, she said.
State Reps. Stephen Adamini, D-Marquette, and Rich Brown, D-Bessemer,
said they had not heard anything of the particular bill coming up in
Michigan yet.
There is a lot of laws about vaccinations and about terrorism, but it is
such a large package that it is hard to break it down, Adamini said.
Fisher said she thinks that it will eventually come up in Michigan.
Maine is the only state that has adopted the bill with the amendment, and
the rumor is that Maryland will pass it without the amendment because it is
the home of John Hopkins University, Fisher said.
The most important action you can take is to give this information to as
many people as you can and let your individual voice be heard, she said.
Citizens can call and write their federal and state legislators, public
officials and talk to community leaders, Fisher said.
No state of emergency in a free society justifies the sacrifice of the
most sacred human right the right to voluntarily decide what you are
willing to risk your life or your childs life for. What it means to be free
doesnt get more basic than that, she said.
|