http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7341/800
|
|
Collections under
which this article appears:
Regulation
|
BMJ 2002;324:800-801 ( 6 April )
Editorials
Murder by fake drugs
Time for international action
Until recently the most infamous internationally known example of fake drug
dealing was Graham Greene's fictional account of a British fake
penicillin peddler who was eliminated in the sewers of postwar Vienna
in The Third Man.1 Unfortunately,
malevolent dealings in counterfeit drugs are very much a contemporary
reality. Notorious recent real examples include neomycin eye drops
and meningococcal vaccine made of tap water; paracetamol syrup
made of industrial solvent; ampicillin consisting of turmeric;
contraceptive pills made of wheat flour; and antimalarials, antibiotics,
and snake antivenom containing no active ingredients.2-9
In a recent survey of pharmacies in the Philippines, 8% of drugs bought were
fake (quoted by Wondemagegnehu2). A countrywide
survey in Cambodia in 1999 showed that 60% of 133 drug vendors
sampled sold, as the antimalarial mefloquine, tablets that contained
the ineffective but much cheaper sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, obtained
from stocks that should have been destroyed, or fakes that contained
no drug at all. 3 4 In
another recent survey, 38% of tablets sold in five countries in
mainland South East Asia as the new antimalarial artesunate were
fake.5 Artesunate is an extremely
important antimalarial drug, and its rapid action and lack of side
effects have created significant demand in endemic areas. These
characteristics, along with a relatively high cost, make artesunate
particularly attractive to counterfeiters, who have gone to great
lengths to deceive patients, using small amounts of ineffectual
bitter chloroquine, copying the blister pack design, and even
providing fake holograms on the package.5 Some
counterfeit drugs contain actively harmful ingredients, not just
bogus placebos. For example, aspirin, thought to be an important
contributor to acidosis in children with malaria10
and a cause of Reye's syndrome, has been used in the manufacture of
fake chloroquine in Africa.6
These pernicious deceptions have been reported mostly in local newspapers.
There is little published medical research assessing their
prevalence, public health impact, or possible countermeasures. The
accumulated evidence, such as it is, suggests that mortality and
morbidity arising from this murderous trade are considerable,
especially in developing countries. They have also given rise to
misperceptions of drug resistance as patients "fail" their
ineffectual treatments. For example, artesunate resistance reported
from Cambodia turned out to be due to unwitting use of fake drugs.
The World Health Organization estimates that 10% of global pharmaceutical
commerce is in fakes.2 In the past, drug
companies have tended to avoid publicising the problem for fear of
"damaging public confidence in medicines."7
Some countries, well aware of the scale of their problem, have
preferred to ignore it.
In the face of this substantial criminal mortality and morbidity there has
been little international action. The appearance of fake anticancer
drugs in the United States led to local action by the pharmaceutical
industry.11 Much more needs to be done
in the developing world. Guidelines have been produced,9
but most developing countries do not have the infrastructure and
financial resources to implement them. 2
6 9
12 Paradoxically, the most accessible testing service
for fake drugs is the free, anonymous service allowing people to
check the authenticity of their illegal ecstasy (MDMA) tablets (www.harmreduction.net).
We hope that the global forum on pharmaceutical anticounterfeiting
organised by Reconnaissance International and the World Health
Organization to be held in September 2002 will address these
issues.
International technical, logistical, and financial support, possibly through
a specialised non-governmental organisation, is needed to allow
impoverished countries to protect their drug supplies. Measures would
include supporting drug regulatory authorities; providing simple,
easily interpretable and cheap markers of authenticity; coordinating
international surveillance for fake and substandard drugs12;
improving the availability of quality assured essential drugs; and
educating patients, healthcare workers, and pharmacists.
All measures that reduce the profit margins for manufacturing fakes, such as
reducing the price and increasing the availability of genuine,
quality assured drugs, will make counterfeiting a less attractive
criminal activity. Uncompromising international police action against
the factories and distribution networks needs the same vigour as that
associated with the pursuit of narcotic peddling.
Information on fake drug identity and distribution needs to be shared
nationally and internationally between government drug regulatory
authorities, customs and police organisations, pharmaceutical
companies, non-governmental organisations, and consumer groups. In
most tropical countries, however, the only check on the authenticity
of the tablets will be the patient or relative buying the medicine,
and considerable publicity will be needed to allow them to discriminate
the potentially curative from the cryptically lethal. The effectiveness
of different strategies allowing patients to reject fake drugs
must be assessed. A social marketing campaign of quality assured,
pre-packaged drugs can offer patients an easily recognisable and
affordable alternative.3 The two edged strategy of
improving the availability of quality assured drugs and public
warnings describing fakes has been very effective in Cambodia, where
a poster and radio education campaign has educated patients to
distinguish fake tablets and has driven the sale of counterfeit
antimalarials further underground. 3
4
Sophisticated techniques, which are hard to copy, such as holograms and
fluorescent markers, can be used to brand the genuine product as
real, but they are often too expensive.11 Simple,
inexpensive and low tech methods to identify fakes should be pursued.
For example, simple colorimetric assays developed for the artemisinins13
have been used successfully to identify fake artesunate tablets.5
The German Pharma Health Fund (www.gphf.org)
has developed the Minilab for analysing the authenticity of a wide
range of essential drugs relatively simply and
inexpensively.
Much of the counterfeit drug trade is probably linked to organised crime,
corruption, the narcotics trade, unregulated pharmaceutical
companies, and the business interests of unscrupulous politicians.14
Much greater international political will to eliminate the problem
is required.
Paul N Newton, clinical lecturer.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, Nuffield Department of
Clinical Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 9DU (newtonpaul100@hotmail.com)
Nicholas J White, professor of tropical medicine.
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand (fnnjw@diamond.mahidol.ac.th)
Jan A Rozendaal, malaria control adviser.
Asian Development Bank - Intensified Communicable Disease Control Project,
Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia
Michael D Green, chemist.
Division of Parasitic Diseases, Center for Disease Control and Prevention,
Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
| 1. |
Greene, HG (1950). The third man. London: Vintage,
2001. |
| 2. |
Wondemagegnehu E. Counterfeit and substandard drugs in
Myanmar and Vietnam. WHO/EDM/QSM/99.3. In: Geneva: WHO, 1999. |
| 3. |
Rozendaal J. Fake antimalarials circulating in Cambodia.
Bull Mekong Malaria Forum 2000; 7: 62-68.
|
| 4. |
Rozendaal JA. Fake antimalaria drugs in Cambodia. Lancet
2001; 357: 890.
|
| 5. |
Newton PN, Proux S, Green M, Smithuis F, Rozendaal J,
Prakongpan S, et al. Fake artesunate in southeast Asia. Lancet 2001;
357: 1948-1950[Medline].
|
| 6. |
Sesay MM. Fake drugs a
new threat of health care delivery. Africa Health 1988; Jun/Jul:
13-15.
|
| 7. |
More UK debate on counterfeits. SCRIP 1989; 3: 1468.
|
| 8. |
ten Dam M. Counterfeit drugs: implications for health.
Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev 1992; 11: 59-65[Medline].
|
| 9. |
World Health Organisation. Counterfeit drugs guidelines
for the development of measures to combat counterfeit drugs. Geneva:
WHO, 1999. |
| 10. |
English M, Marsh V, Amukoye E, Lowe B, Murphy S, Marsh K.
Chronic salicylate poisoning and severe malaria. Lancet 1996; 347:
1736-1737[Medline].
|
| 11. |
Reconnaissance International. Authentication News ,
2001;Jul:7. |
| 12. |
Taylor RB, Shakoor O, Behrens RH, Everard M, Low AS,
Wangboonskul J, et al. Pharmacopoeial quality of drugs supplied by Nigerian
pharmacies. Lancet 2001; 357: 1933-1936[Medline].
|
| 13. |
Green MD, Mount DL, Wirtz RA. Authentication of artemether,
artesunate and dihydroartemisinin antimalarial tablets using a simple
colorimetric method. Trop Med Int Health 2001; 6: 980-982[Medline].
|
| 14. |
Saywell T, McManus J. What's in that pill? Far Eastern
Economic Review. 21 Feb 2002, pp 34-40. Hong Kong. |
© BMJ 2002
|
|
Collections under
which this article appears:
Regulation
|
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.