http://bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/324/7341/809

BMJ For Health Professionals
 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

Abridged text of this article
PDF [abridged] of this article
Full text of this article
PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Send a response to this article
See related This week in BMJ item
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Trotter, C. L || Edmunds, W J.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Other Health Policy
Drugs: immunological products and vaccines
Drugs: infections
Health education (including prevention and promotion)
Health Economics

BMJ 2002;324:809 ( 6 April )
 

Papers

Modelling cost effectiveness of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination campaign in England and Wales

Caroline L Trotter, research scientista W John Edmunds, research fellowb

a Immunisation Division, PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9 5EQ, b Department of Economics, City University, London EC1V 0HB

Correspondence to: C Trotter ctrotter@phls.org.uk

Objectives: To assess the cost effectiveness of a meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination campaign in 0-17 year olds.
Design: Cost effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the healthcare provider.
Setting: England and Wales.
Main outcome measure: Cost per life year saved.
Results: In 1998-9, immediately before the introduction of meningococcal C vaccination, the burden of serogroup C disease was considerable, with an estimated 1137 cases in people aged 0-17 years and at least 72 deaths. The vaccination campaign is estimated to have cost between £126m ($180m, 207m) and £241m ($343m, 395m), depending on the price of the vaccine. Under base case assumptions the cost per life year saved from the vaccination campaign is estimated to be £6259. School based vaccination was more cost effective than general practice based vaccination because of lower delivery costs. Immunisation of infants aged under 1 year was the least cost effective component of the campaign because, although this maximises the life years gained, the three dose schedule required is more expensive than other methods of delivery. Estimates of the cost per life year saved were sensitive to assumptions on the future incidence of disease and the case fatality ratio.
Conclusions: Meningococcal C vaccination is likely to be more cost effective in all age groups when the incidence of disease is high. It is also more cost effective when given to children aged 1-4 (by general practitioners) and to children and young people aged 5-17 years at school than when administered to infants under 12 months of age or young people aged 16-17 years who are not at school.

 

What is already known on this topic
The burden of group C meningococcal disease in England and Wales in the late 1990s was considerable

In November 1999 the United Kingdom was the first country to introduce mass vaccination against group C meningococcal disease

There are no published economic evaluations of the vaccination campaign

What this study adds
This economic evaluation supports the introduction of the meningococcal C vaccine

School based vaccination is more cost effective than routine vaccination of infants because delivery costs are lower and fewer doses are required



 


 


© BMJ 2002

 

 


Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ Click here for all your web solutions
 

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.