http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7342/867
| Home | Help | Search/Archive | Feedback | Table of Contents |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
A senior pharmaceutical company executive says estimates of the prevalence of diseases are often exaggerated.
Using the example of his company's promotion of "social phobia," Fred Nadjarian, managing director of Roche in Australia, said: "The marketing people always beat [hype] these things up. It's just natural enthusiasm."
The candid comments come as the pharmaceutical industry intensifies its push to loosen European regulations on direct-to-consumer promotions involving both "disease awareness campaigns" and straight advertisements for drugs.
In the late 1990s Roche planned to market its antidepressant moclobemide (marketed as Aurorix in Australia and as Manerix in the United Kingdom) for the treatment of social phobia. A media release sponsored by Roche claimed at the time that more than one million Australians suffered a "soul destroying" psychiatric disorder called "social phobia," which could be treated with behavioural therapy and drugs.
In an interview last month Mr Nadjarian said he now feels he was somewhat "taken in" by the estimates that were presented to him of the prevalence of social phobia. "I thought there might be a big market. But when we tried to recruit [for clinical trials] we just weren't able to," he said.
While not disputing the existence of legitimate illness, Mr Nadjarian said the extent of social phobia was much smaller than was initially thought.
He argues that his experience with that one condition highlights a much wider problem: "If you added up all the statistics, we all must have about 20 diseases. A lot of these things are blown out of all proportion," he said.
The comments add weight to fears that pharmaceutical companies may be
systematically seeking to portray certain health conditions in ways
that maximise their size and seriousness
partly
to help build markets for new products.
Acknowledging the obvious potential for conflicts of interest when drug
companies sponsor publicity about diseases, Mr Nadjarian said:
"Behind every statistic there is a vested interest." He added that
while the vested interests of a company official are clear, other
people such as professors who appear independent may also have a
vested interest in exaggerating estimates of a disease's prevalence
so
as to attract attention to an area of research. "There's a natural
human tendency to exaggerate," he said. (See p 886.)
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Read all Rapid Responses
| Home | Help | Search/Archive | Feedback | Table of Contents |
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.