Breaking News Archives
- each day's breaking news from December 1, 2003
(check here for breaking news you might have missed and breaking news that
didn't ever hit the "front page")
More News -
all the news most recently
posted on this website
All the News - a running tab of
everything posted on this website since October 29, 2003
click here to
download Adobe Reader click
here for Picks
of the Week click
here for the old "Recommended List"
To receive daily "top stories" updates, send an email to
sandym@touchngo.com with the words "subscribe
top stories" in the subject line. For today's
top stories, click
here.
Vaccine-related
(including autism)
►January 7, 2004 -
Judge OKs military anthrax vaccinations - Santa Maria Times - "A federal judge
Wednesday allowed the military to resume anthrax inoculations, although he
questioned the timing of a government announcement declaring the vaccine safe."
►January 7, 2004 -
Judge OKs military anthrax vaccinations - A federal
judge cleared the way Wednesday for the Pentagon to resume vaccinating military
personnel against anthrax after lifting his injunction against the mandatory
inoculation program. - CNN - U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan granted a motion
from Defense Department attorneys to limit the effect of his vaccine ban to the
six plaintiffs who are suing the government...'In the absence of a proven
correlate of immunity between humans and animals, specific to anthrax infection,
the FDA's Final Rule's reliance on animal data is illegal, and reflects an
arbitrary and capricious decision. Therefore, the government's victory today may
only be fleeting,' said attorney Mark Zaid."
Comment: Note how this journalist did not buy
into everything the CHR officer said.
►January 7, 2004 -
Vaccines: New Campaigns Against Scepticism, Says Sirchia - "'We must launch
new vaccine campaigns, despite the recent scepticisms' said today health
minister Girolamo Sirchia, in Genoa to attend the 'Children and the
Mediterranean conference. 'The fact that a measles epidemic has killed three
people in Campania and that flu kills thousands of people each year is a crime,
just as ignoring that a vaccine exists is. There is an anti-scientific behaviour
which establishes that the vaccine causes the disease. We have gone back to step
1, when Jenner and Pasteur were considered plague-spreaders'. According to the
minister, the fear of vaccines is due to a lack of information: 'the more
scientific development advances, the more anti-scientific movements come about.
Today's vaccines are completely safe - concluded Sirchia - even the one against
smallpox. There are no risks whatsoever'.
Comment: If it's not
obvious by now that politics and medicine shouldn't mix, I don't know when it
will be. "NO RISKS WHATSOEVER"? And why are these politicians (like
Blair earlier today) suddenly speaking out, and so confidently and vociferously?
What's up or about to be?
►January 7, 2004 -
UNICEF
to Buy LG's Vaccines - Korea Times - "UNICEF
will buy Hepatitis vaccines from LG Life Science for $22 million for the next
three years...In addition, about 50 billion won worth of the vaccines will be
provided the to Pan American Health Organization this year."
►January 7, 2004 - Flu
vaccine safe for kids, says doc - Edmunton Sun - "A top city doctor has
moved to reassure local parents after a Calgary tot died within a month of
getting a flu shot...'The vaccine is a very safe vaccine,' said Dr. Marcia
Johnson, deputy medical officer of health for Capital Health. "'There have been
no deaths of children in Capital Health related to influenza that we are aware
of.'...The vaccine poses no risk to kids under the age of two years old, she
said."
Comment: Whew.
That's quite a mouthful. First, how clever they must be to be able to
already know that there is no danger. And how gullible they must think the
public is - no studies, not even fake ones, are deemed necessary before issuing
such sweeping, reassuring statements. And while I'm not sure what is meant
by "Capital Health", if Calgary is covered by it, it does seem that they have
dismissed the possibility that the death of an infant one month after receiving
a flu vaccine could be related to the vaccine. And "no risk"? (Even
the flu manufacturers don't go that far.) Hmmm, would the "top city doctor" be
willing to sign a guarantee?
Comment:
First, there is no evidence from this article how the comparison was made and
upon what the conclusion was based. However, given that neither vaccine is
supposed to be the right strain, one can't help but wonder if perhaps the
headline should say it proves to be as "ineffective" as the "needle" vaccine.
►January 7, 2004 - Hope
for leukaemia vaccine - Successful tests in mice could herald a vaccine
treatment for people with a form of leukaemia. - BBC
Comment: If this
vaccine is actually safe and effective, and is only given to those who have
leukaemia and choose to take it, just as with the "anti-nicotine" vaccine below,
it may have a meaningful role to play.
Comment: What will be expected from the
state in exchange for having received this funding?
►January 6, 2004 - Anthrax
Vaccine Litigants To File Class-action Complaint Against DOD (requires
subscription) - www.insidedefense.com
- "Plaintiffs challenging the Pentagons 5-year-old mass inoculation program
against anthrax will amend their complaint within the next 24 hours to include a
class-action certification, according to one of the lead attorneys...The move
constitutes the latest salvo in a legal tit-for-tat with the Bush administration
following a federal judges Dec. 22 injunction against mandatory anthrax
inoculations, which the Defense Department gives military personnel serving
abroad in regions where they may face a biological threat."
Comment: This is a good example why medicine and
politics don't (or shouldn't) mix. What makes Blair an expert on this
subject and competent to meaningfully reassure the public about their MMR/autism
fears?
Comment: As long as this vaccine is restricted to
willing users (and actually is safe and effective), it might be an example of a
reasonable product because it is targeted at people who already have (and
recognize they have) a problem. Compare that to the childhood vaccines,
which are forced on healthy children who may or may not (most likely will not)
have a problem with the disease the vaccine is alleged to (safely) prevent.
►January 6, 2004 - Commentary:
Senseless opt-out anthrax ruling must be reversed - The Union Leader and
New Hampshire Sunday News - "The decision of Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the D.C.
District Court, which will be binding until the full court can hear the trial or
the Supreme Court overturns it, was based on 1998 federal legislation that says
service members cannot be forced to take experimental drugs...Granted, it was a
piece of bad legislation based not on scientific evidence but rather on
kowtowing to Gulf War Syndrome activists."
Comment:
Rhogam,
given to counteract the effects of Rh Factor in pregnancy, has been a
traditional source of
mercury exposure
for both mother and baby.
►January 7, 2004 - A
Plague For The Ages Book
Recounts Horror Of 1918 Pandemic That Killed At Least 20 Million Worldwide -
book review - Hartford Courant via
www.ctnow.com - "This
winter's nasty outbreak of influenza carries only the faintest echo of one of
the deadliest plagues in the history of humanity - the 1918 influenza
pandemic..Contemporary news photos of long lines of people waiting for vanishing
flu vaccine shots shows the public has not lost all fear of influenza, which
kills about 36,000 people annually. Reports of an apparently higher than normal
number of deaths among young children are heart-rending and nerve-wracking for
all parents...Yet it is nearly impossible today to fully comprehend the scope of
the 1918 catastrophe. What would be the reaction today to the deaths of 1.75
million Americans - the equivalent of the 675,000 U.S. lives claimed by 1918
pandemic - or a global death toll that has been estimated to be between 20
million to 100 million lives?"
Comment:
But what actually caused the pandemic? Did it have anything to do with the
privations caused by and experienced in WWI? Were there other relevant and
important factors that no longer apply? Rather than rush willy-nilly to
take the latest drug or vaccine, these and many other questions are in great
need of study and answers. But who, other than the drug companies and the
government, have an incentive to pay for such studies? And can we trust
government sponsored studies now that it is in the business of pushing vaccines?
Comment: What is it
going to take for the general public to get the fact that the immune system is
being tinkered with via vaccines in spite of the fact that it is understood, and
not because of it? And when will the public realize that this fact is not
a trivial one and carries with it great risk?
►January 7, 2004 - Studies
have shown meditation may boost the immune system - The Baltimore Sun via
Seattle PI - "A funny thing happened to meditation on the way to the 21st
century. It got demystified, and in the process became acceptable to mainstream
America...You won't hear people talking about Nirvana much with today's
Westernized meditation, and there's hardly a crystal in sight. Instead
scientists are studying Buddhist monks with electroencephalographs and magnetic
resonance imaging."
Breaking News Archives
- each day's breaking news from December 1, 2003
(check here for breaking news you might have missed and breaking news that
didn't ever hit the "front page")
More News -
all the news most recently
posted on this website
All the News - a running tab of
everything posted on this website since October 29, 2003
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"